Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Rail franchise debacle

  1. #1

    Default Rail franchise debacle

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19809717

    The decision to award the UK's multi-billion-pound West Coast Main Line rail franchise to FirstGroup has been scrapped by the government.

    Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin said it was "deeply regrettable" that mistakes had been made by staff within the Department for Transport. Several staff have been suspended.

    The estimated cost of reimbursing the companies for the cost of their bids will be £40m, he said.
    Looks like a bit of a shambles to me.

    Perhaps the government should privatise the bidding process...?

  2. #2

    Default

    I really despair with public sector procurement - they must be some of the most inept, gormless fools on the planet.

  3. #3

    Default

    £40million down the pan. Brilliant.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Down in a tube station at midnight
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Unbelievable, glad to see the government has a firm grip on public funds, what 40million to us anyway.
    T0ssers.

  5. #5

    Default

    Any coincidence that Justine Greening has been shunted off to the International Development slot in the reshuffle where she can do less damage?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sunny Shirley
    Posts
    1,158

    Default

    Will anyone actually be sacked?

    If you worked for a private company and made this kind of cock-up, you'd be out on your ear but it never seems to happen to civil servants or local authority people, they just "learn lessons".

  7. #7

    Default

    Public sector procurement screw up again, if i did this in with my company i would be down the road big time

  8. #8

    Default

    Crickey, it only they had been as good as that beacon of private companies, G4S.

    Regardless, it's a 'kin shambles.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Outside SMS trying to stop any Japanese people getting in.
    Posts
    2,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ecuk268 View Post
    Will anyone actually be sacked?

    If you worked for a private company and made this kind of cock-up, you'd be out on your ear but it never seems to happen to civil servants or local authority people, they just "learn lessons".
    Four civil servants have been suspended. Which means they'll be placed on gardening leave for a year or so, then given a nice new job once this has all died down.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    52:12:07.84N, 0:07:41.43E
    Posts
    4,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CB Saint View Post
    Any coincidence that Justine Greening has been shunted off to the International Development slot in the reshuffle where she can do less damage?
    Strangely I believe EVERY government minister relating to the department of transport was moved in the reshuffle. Not that the goverment claimed to know about the problem then...

  11. #11

    Default

    They didn't want a can of worms to be opened once it became clear that Branson was going to push it all the way.Murky politics in my opinion.

  12. #12

    Default

    It's all a complete Horlicks, I have never been in favour of rail privatisation, it's a silly idea. As my local MP once said: 'How can you have competition on the railways? One train can't overtake another'.

  13. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Whitey Grandad View Post
    It's all a complete Horlicks, I have never been in favour of rail privatisation, it's a silly idea. As my local MP once said: 'How can you have competition on the railways? One train can't overtake another'.
    The 'competitive' part of it isn't the running of the service, per se, but (supposedly) the regular tender process when it comes to retaining or gaining the licence.

    So, a train company runs the service as if they were vying for punters so that their bid looks good the next time the licence is up for offer again.

    As I say, that's the theory...as long as you've got competent procurement people it works fine...doh...
    Last edited by trousers; 05-10-2012 at 04:47 PM.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    on the sunny southcoast
    Posts
    3,467
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Whitey Grandad View Post
    It's all a complete Horlicks, I have never been in favour of rail privatisation, it's a silly idea. As my local MP once said: 'How can you have competition on the railways? One train can't overtake another'.
    agree and the countrys not big enough for all these different company's and its about time we had a one national rail company.

  15. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by solentstars View Post
    agree and the countrys not big enough for all these different company's and its about time we had a one national rail company.
    As long as you promise it'll be run better than last time it was state owned

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Formerly Clapham
    Posts
    1,593

    Default

    The problem with the franchise system is that if you make the broad (very broad) assumption that better service = lower profit then the profit insentive for the operators is to do JUST enough to keep the franchise and no more.

    for me competition will only work if I can go to a station and choose between two trains for the same journey on the same day and I can't see how that is going to be possible.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •