
Originally Posted by
badgerx16
It does throw into question the competence and/or motivation of the anti-doping authorities. A pro cycling squad has at least 14 riders on it's roster, each of whom undertakes a mandatory minimum number of out-of-competition drug tests, as well as the tests carried in competition; whether as stage or race winners / podium places, or just as random selections. Across Armstrong's 7 successful seasons, how many of his colleagues failed a test ? ( Very rough maths: 14 riders * 7 seasons * 36 tests ( probably underestimated ) on average per year ).
On top of that, squad members, whether riders or 'back room' staff come and go, so how many people were 'in' on the scam, and why did they keep shtum, even after leaving the team ?
As for the USADA document - whilst it does appear damning, it currently lies untested and unquestioned in a public court - there has been no cross examination of the 'witnesses', ( all of whom seem to have plea-bargained their own cases and given statements in exchange for leniency ), and no independent verification of any drug test results.
Bookmarks