saint_stevo Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 pleads guily to downloading and distributing child porn http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10735857 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 They should have just executed him the first time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Everyone deserves a second chance, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Everyone deserves a second chance, surely? For downloading child porn? I wonder what his valley park friend Mr Thompson thinks abotu all this. I wonder if he likes child porn too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Depends what for.... And kidnapping, torturing and murdering a defenceless little boy is not something i would give someone a second chance over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 For downloading child porn? I wonder what his valley park friend Mr Thompson thinks abotu all this. I wonder if he likes child porn too? Yeah i heard about that, seems that Hampshire is a bit of a lowlife haven, what with Glitter up the road as well. In his BMW M9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Yeah i heard about that, seems that Hampshire is a bit of a lowlife haven, what with Glitter up the road as well. In his BMW M9 Yep, 'tis true, I met him. ( Thompson that is, not Glitter ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 cant we release him on compassionate grounds...like we do with mass murdering terrorists..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 For downloading child porn? I wonder what his valley park friend Mr Thompson thinks abotu all this. I wonder if he likes child porn too? You dirty ba5tard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View From The Top Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 cant we release him on compassionate grounds...like we do with mass murdering terrorists..? "We" didn't release any terrorist, the jocks did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 cant we release him on compassionate grounds...like we do with mass murdering terrorists..? Only if he has a serious bout of tonsilitis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tickle Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I wonder what his valley park friend Mr Thompson thinks abotu all this. I wonder if he likes child porn too? Urban Myth..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I wonder what his valley park friend Mr Thompson thinks abotu all this. I wonder if he likes child porn too? Urban Myth..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Urban Myth..... Urban Myth..... Dog forgot who he was logged in as for a second there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Lost in the noise that this was Venables, with all his notoriety, is the fact that he was convicted of downloading child porn, not creating it. As bad as that is, the worse offence, surely, is that committed by those who actually staged and photographed the images in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 "We" didn't release any terrorist, the jocks did. Good Friday Agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I'm not going to defend Venables, but I do think he's had an entirely f*cked up existence. What he did at 10 years old is indescribable, but I'm a firm advocate of 'blame the parents' and the life up to that point. He'd clearly already been entirely failed by everyone around him and his local authority, otherwise he wouldn not or could not have done what he did to poor JB. God knows what it's been like for him since. I'm not surprised he's ****ed up. It goes without saying that the family of JB were in a more terrible situation in the conventional sense, but I find the whole affair to be one sad thing after another for all concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skintsaint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 how can you ban someone from using the internet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Surely he must be mentally ill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Serious question: Do you get blind paedophiles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I'm not going to defend Venables, but I do think he's had an entirely f*cked up existence. What he did at 10 years old is indescribable, but I'm a firm advocate of 'blame the parents' and the life up to that point. He'd clearly already been entirely failed by everyone around him and his local authority, otherwise he wouldn not or could not have done what he did to poor JB. God knows what it's been like for him since. I'm not surprised he's ****ed up. It goes without saying that the family of JB were in a more terrible situation in the conventional sense, but I find the whole affair to be one sad thing after another for all concerned. I think that an aweful lot has to be put upon the parents and the authorities around him that did fail him, that is unquestionable. Unfortunately i also think that some people are just destined to be evil, JV was one of those people. I cannot understand the people that advocate that the kids had no realisation of right and wrong as it was not instilled in them from the parents, that is just complete bullsh*t. Every kid understands right and wrong no matter whether it is 'taught' or not, that is why you know a kid is up to something as before they commit something that is considered wrong they will always look around to see if any adults are watching and if they catch an adult watching will look at them for a few seconds as if to see what they are going to do or say. What IS taught to most kids is the ability to act on the instinct of commiting to something that is wrong and to avoid doing it. Unfortunately you get two camps of these kind of kids, those that are able to get away with what they want, and those that will do it anyways, JV was always in the latter group and with all the money being needed to prop up the economy at the moment anyone who is convicted beyond all reasonable doubt of peadophilia, murder or rape and especially murder that was torturous should be put to death and forgotten about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Do you get blind paedophiles? The answer to that is yes. Theres an article somewhere that states that paedohiles come from all walks of life, cultures religion and disabilities. i Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjsaint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 IMO he'll get what he deserves sooner or later. And it won't be pretty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robsk II Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Not sure killing him achieves anything, or makes anyone better than him. I don't believe people are born evil - don't believe in evil as such - although perhaps some are born with certain predispositions. I do entirely agree that most kids know what is right and what is wrong, (subjective anyway, let's be honest) but some certainly do not understand enough in depth the consequences of acts or what they mean. I know they set out to 'get some kid' or whatever but I'm not convinved they really knew what they were doing, what it meant. I have no intention of defending the acts - but I always advocate trying to understand rather than just kill, because if nothing else, that is more likely to prevent future barbarities more than a death sentence for 10 year old kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Jim Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Only 2 years, what a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Only 2 years, what a joke Probably the standard tarriff for the offence he pleaded guilty to today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Not sure killing him achieves anything, or makes anyone better than him. I don't believe people are born evil - don't believe in evil as such - although perhaps some are born with certain predispositions. I do entirely agree that most kids know what is right and what is wrong, (subjective anyway, let's be honest) but some certainly do not understand enough in depth the consequences of acts or what they mean. I know they set out to 'get some kid' or whatever but I'm not convinved they really knew what they were doing, what it meant. I have no intention of defending the acts - but I always advocate trying to understand rather than just kill, because if nothing else, that is more likely to prevent future barbarities more than a death sentence for 10 year old kids. You really are a boring sap. I would have kicked Thompson into an inch of his life if I had realised who he was at the time when I met him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints11 Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 You really are a boring sap. I would have kicked Thompson into an inch of his life if I had realised who he was at the time when I met him. Can you get his autograph next time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefunkygibbons Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 2 years for this offence and then he will still have to go before the parole board to see whether he can get back out on licence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Can you get his autograph next time? Tehcnically I did have his autograph on his guest card when he came in for a look around the gym... and his address... and his phone number etc etc... I bottled it at the time and shredded it because would have defo cost me my job and probably a day in court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints11 Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Surely you must remember some of those details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Surely you must remember some of those details? I know his name, I know he lives in the Valley Park area of Chandlers Ford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I know his name, I know he lives in the Valley Park area of Chandlers Ford. I was told his address was a road that may or may not have the same name as a south coast resort and near a pub with an anagrammed name , het tuh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I know his name, I know he lives in the Valley Park area of Chandlers Ford. You now have to apply to him to view his Facebook account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfcuk fan Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Everyone deserves a second chance, surely? He was given a second chance when he was granted anonimity and a new identity after the JB case. Although distasteful I can understand that because he was himself a child at the time. However, as an adult he has now blown that second chance and as a convicted paedophile should now be named and shamed and face the consequences of his adult actions the same as every other paedo out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonjoe Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Which gym? Hopefully not mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.comsaint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 He should be dangling on 6ft of hemp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chin Strain Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 You now have to apply to him to view his Facebook account. How do you know his name then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 How do you know his name then? It's not a very imaginative name. Doing a quick bit of research you can easily piece it together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 23 July, 2010 Author Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Littlewood Monaghan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Benson Phillips Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Littlewood Monaghan I would suggest that the said person MIGHT have the same surname. And the first name might have been changed to someones name whom you will be able to find linked to the said person... although not John... as it goes. And I am not saying any more because I am sure there are laws etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 It's not a very imaginative name. Doing a quick bit of research you can easily piece it together. I wouldn't know where to start... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I would do what he did to Jamie Bulger, and lay him on the rail tracks and let a train decapitate him, obviously after a bit of torture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I would suggest that the said person MIGHT have the same surname. And the first name might have been changed to someones name whom you will be able to find linked to the said person... although not John... as it goes. And I am not saying any more because I am sure there are laws etc... you just want to tell a few scousers and they'll do the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 23 July, 2010 Author Share Posted 23 July, 2010 (edited) I would suggest that the said person MIGHT have the same surname. And the first name might have been changed to someones name whom you will be able to find linked to the said person... although not John... as it goes. And I am not saying any more because I am sure there are laws etc... I know his name. Edited 23 July, 2010 by saint_stevo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 I know his name. Hence my 'clues' How do you know? I can't work it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 why was he let out....??? chemical castration in order here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Serious question: Do you get blind paedophiles? any blind paedo listens to my kids I swear I'll do time (copyright Private Eye) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 Do you get blind paedophiles? Mgtw amdgt mxtqjgd a gd1mtjp gwuj. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 23 July, 2010 Share Posted 23 July, 2010 To all those making bizarre claims about knowing the recent whereabouts of Venables, and threatening violence from behind their computer screens, Venables has been living until now in Cheshire. So any 'violence' actually perpetrated down here would have been against a perfectly innocent man. Utterly, utterly pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now