Patrick Bateman

Agree with this. We walked away from the ground smug as fk, but it should never have been like that, should've been a 4-0 match, defensive shambles.

It's shit.

I voted yes. I've enjoyed a lot of the football I've watched, the team seems more of a "team" who play for each other and communicate. Yes some of the backwards play can be tiresome and yes it would be lovely to see more counter attacking, but we can't have it all. I don't actually think he's a bad bloke either, he comes over very well and isn't a complete stuck up penis. I don't know who could've done a better job tbh and if the club (can I blame Wilcox?? 🤣) had bought a decent striker who was FIT from the start of the season, many more of the chances the team create would've been goals. Yes those 4 matches in September were horrific and he looked way out of his depth then, but what I've seen since has mostly been decent. Just get a bloody fit goal scorer in ...

Can you?? Oh nice, I didn't know that, thank you ... shows how little attention I pay to their marketing, oops!

Thanks that's what I thought. When I started doing the Now TV day pass it was £6.99, which was decent value, I never normally bother now at £11.99, way too steep but wanted to see tonights. I'll find a stream 🤣

I can't go tonight, but noticed it's on 'Sky Football', is that one of those channels that isn't covered on the Now TV day sports pass? I seem to remember falling for that scam before, anyone know?

FFS!! 🤣

Where is the news that he's on his way?

Agree. Sat on the halfway line against 'boro, and decided to watch Bree (of all players) and KWP as the positioning fascinated me. KWP was smashing forwards in a proper right winger position, but Bree seemed to be doing the inverted full back thing, but he did it well, better than Manning did. Manning was good when not asked to do that and just defend as a left back, but Bree seems to have the skills to do that role better. N.B. I'm not saying "well", but "better", I still hate it.

Never heard of it, what is it? Is it the pub thing on the kingsland stand?

Christ.

I'm not the one who is worked up here, I want you to learn the definition of far right. I am not defending GB News, or anyone, just wanting you to admit you're incorrect with labelling them far right. The over use of "far right" and "far left" in this country is laughable, by people who don't understand what it actually means. I refer you to my previous post. And you don't know my politics, I haven't told you, however I won't be voting blue, red or for Tice/Anderson (no idea what colour they are?).

Just go read what the definition of far right actually means, this is a decent starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics#:~:text=Far-right politics%2C or right,often also including nativist tendencies. The Conservative party are not "far right". GB News is not "far right". Your view point is absolutely baffling and completely skewed, you are blind to reality. Go and live in a country with a far right or far left government and see how long you last if you aren't purged or put in prison etc. Let's look at this text here: "Far-right politics have led to oppression, political violence, forced assimilation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against groups of people based on their supposed inferiority or their perceived threat to the native ethnic group, nation, state, national religion, dominant culture, or conservative social institutions" Is anyone oppressed in this country or by watching a news channel? No. Has anyone faced political violence? Well yes, currently there is a lot of antisemitism. Ethnic cleansing, genocide ... NO! We live in a tolerant society, arguably the most tolerant in the world and you are welcome to try to disprove that statement. Even Reform are not a 'far right" party and the BBC have had to apologise (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/19/bbc-apologises-for-calling-reform-uk-far-right) or face action for labelling them as such at the weekend, they back-tracked pretty damn quickly with that one. Lee Anderson in my opinion is a prat, but I am allowed that opinion - doesn't make me far left to say that. There is nothing wrong with having a centre right news channel, to say it's far right is just plain wrong and like me saying Channel 4 news is far left. It isn't. There is no point getting so worked up about it all and to my original point, it's wrong (and libellous as per the BBC this week) to label it far right.

What's the random opinion piece by a random journalist got to do with your incorrect statement that GB News is 'far right'? You're just plain wrong with your original statement.

"far right" Don't be a helmet.