Jump to content

Block34

Members
  • Posts

    382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Block34's Achievements

  1. Quote from son who was at the game... Shocking! Terrible game management Crying out for subs. Too late
  2. Thinking that maybe the owners are either hoping for a Ted Lasso epiphany from the Wiz or planning the failure of "AFC Richmond"?
  3. Me - am I not in my right mind? Or a you just being a gobshite for fun?
  4. What the dickens is Levy's game plan here?
  5. Had mine done in Winchester by Mr Gore - what a name for a surgeon! Bring in his mates Drs De'ath and Blood and you've got a proper team! Hope you get the all clear chap, that is what really matters. The procedure is, errr, different, but you do get to have a look around inside as it were. The bladderoscopy (or whatever it's called) is a damn sight more challenging. Only one way in for that! Same size sodding camera though....
  6. Point of order…. You should perhaps have quoted these figures…. not these… So not such a ‘cheeky’ return as you (disingenuously) put it, but certainly better than the rates you and I could get. What's more interesting is that it suggests that the remaining £4.5m in interest comes from the ~£30m non-owner loans, or 15%. Makes Kat's 5% look a bargain
  7. Block34

    Puel

    Not being a technical football chappie, so looking for an explanation here ..... are those of you saying that our players can't 'do' the diamond thing that Puel has introduced intimating its because they're basically one trick ponies?? Surely any footballer worth his salt can play any style or tactical nuance (given practice) and indeed change it at will as circumstances require or don't our players do that? So you're really saying our players are shît? After all, it's the players who do the ball-kicking thing.....
  8. Block34

    Puel

    As Poch said, the language of football is international. Puel's public persona is irrelevant, his football language is the important one. ...btw, your written delivery does come across as very pompous, I presume this wasn't intended. Perhaps neither is Puel's 'droning prosody'?
  9. I saw what you did there!! ...in the Wags 'box' / Pardew You bad man
  10. My god, I'm doing it again, agreeing with Dalek. think I'd better log off and go lie down.....
  11. Same as with Dalek really (am I really saying this?) and same as for every year, 17th = acceptable, owt better a bonus, 18th or lower = bøllocks, ah well, Championship was well fun last time around. Not the end of the world. Still getting over no having to fight against relegation since promotion. Last 3 yrs have been brill but each season is a new one, so, 40pts pls M Puel (and if you can do that by January that would be MOST acceptable)
  12. No, not cynical...but standing back a little..... Must say it does seem a tad bizarre for our/any club to deliberately put out a 'failure' message as a forum leak such as Guan has just done, onto a forum that at best likely has 3% of a St Mary's worth of supporters looking at it. Same applies to positive leaks too. Audience is too small to justify it? Not only is it 'bad press' but, if accurate/correct, it just gives way too much information to other clubs who would likely think "ahh, when SFC come a-calling for [playersname] add on a few mill, they'll be desperate". It was even a 'secret' approach so why publicise it? Now, rather than just an exercise in feeding us suicidal sheep on SWF a few data-slops to slay our hunger for any news, if it is more a case of disinformation (but who knows for what purpose) then that would seem more credible and our ITKers then become mere SFC tools (in the nicest way) and players in the game. Still don't see why we'd leak an actual fail...... ...unless it's a smoke screen......?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})