supaimpy_returns

Lol LONG

HA HA Spuds , , not singing OUR SONG now are you boys!!!!!! brilliant result

Peter Schmeichel after seeing him shout at his defenders to do Kevin Davies at The Dell

Well Chelsea can only sell him to a club he wants to sign for, seem to remember players have a say, and lets face it, we are in the best position to tap him up!

One player I really won't miss , part of the worse back 4 for a couple of seasons, far to slow on the turn and once upfield can't get back . Quite happy to see a bid accepted , hope he passes medical

let him go for free at the end of his contract is nothing like the losses we've had on others and yet to recoup, just Lemina and Hoedt equals the same loss , yet a season with Ings in the team would be a far greater achievement that either of those have achieved! So I'd keep him on , given our recent recruitment the risk is lower with Ings

Actually think the red worked for us, we had to sit back , rather than try and win with Che and Redders we dug in and the expectation level was lower, this could be a massive shot in the arm , proves we don't fold when 10 men, don't always fold against Leicester, and a Friday night game we've survived But had to turn the sound off as every other sentence either had 9 0 or Leicester need to get 3 points, FFS Saints were the home side and needed the points just as much¬

Did we even have a shot other than the Diallo volley ? The midfield is so static it was just a matter of time before Leicester scored , then its game over , as for making changes on 85 mins, ffs its a semifinal , one chance the changes at 60 mins should've been made to give then time to get to the pace , but once again we leave it too late. Just hope that there truly are 3 worse teams below us in the Prem , although if the European league comes to be then there will be no money left and Saints with the current structure will just fade away.

I was going to suggest Jefferson Lerma might be just the sort of in your face midfielder who'd be available

Well why doesn’t the ref simply go to the pitch side and review the film? It wouldn’t take any longer than the present delays .If it’s not a clear offside which I think should be either foot in an offside position then go with the attacking side. Ok he gets a second opinion but the final decision should ALWAYS be the guy in the middle of the game . VAR then is simply another Lino not the judge of fact. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Spot on , PEH practically stopped the game waiting for free kick and he just waved his arms as for the amount of dissent allowed reckon his bosses will be telling him to man up when Palace surrounded him Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 would’ve helped swing the goal differential back Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Starting to doubt RH tactical nous quite agree players and best players Bertie and Yoshi should’ve been on at start VesteguRd far to immobile and generally a hearing disaster. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

well to be honest I wish I could keep away from Sky News, The Echo, Solent, and here. been quite happy to think MLT in charge and seriously considered buying season ticket for me and my daugther. this evening though I'm firmly of the belief that the club has died. I now believe that the situation is being controlled to get SFC in admin and remove the argument on admin. can't see any reason for anyone to invest to be honest, the ground is in an area thats not exactly prime, the football club yes has a proud history but there nothing there at this point in time on the playing to make me think the clubs luck is about to change. so how do i feel ? despondant and just wish I didn't care as much, but only takes one comment at work and I'm defending the club. i feel an injustice has been done by the FL trying to mix its rules with those of corporate law but also feel that we are already in pole postiton to be the first real casualty and in years to come we'll be mentioned just as acrington stanley were in the tv ad as just a distant memory

Perhaps Pinnancle are asking this If your applying sanctions against the 'old' company and expect the new company to accept them, do you (FL) accept that no further sanctions can be applied against the 'new' company for problems with the 'old' company? reading the Leeds statement it seems the FL wanted to be able to further punish the new Leeds for the faults of the old Leeds. surely all Pinnancle really are seeking is an understanding that the 10 points = a clean slate for SFC?