Jump to content

'arry's in the poo...!


Micky
 Share

Recommended Posts

"In November 2007 when he was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud and false accounting. The High Court ruled that officers who raided Redknapp's home in connection with that inquiry had acted unlawfully.

 

From what I have been told, at the time (2007) am I correct to assume that any evidence collected would have be deemed inadmissable, hence the police had to start from scratch to catch him out?

 

If for example they had found loads of incriminating info on the conputer that they may or may not have taken it would have had to be returned to the accused and disregarded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})