'Arry's in the Poo - Triffic

2 counts of cheating the public revenue - as if...

On SSN.

to the Tower with him.....

Any chance this carries a minimum of 15 years inside?

Kill him.

What sort of punishment does it carry if he's found guilty?

What sort of punishment does it carry if he's found guilty?

His gonads are steamed in marmalade

His gonads are steamed in marmalade

then eaten by Kippy.

I'll make a lovely arabiatta sauce to go with them.

A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

And just to think, I've always trusted that man! I mean, you couldn't have a more honest face could you.

A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

 

 

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

So in other words, if found guilty he'll just get a fine and a slap on the wrists.

His mates in the media will bleat about what an injustice it all is to poor old 'Arry, salt of the earth guv'nor that he is. Then it'll all be swept under the carpet.

Excellent news.

Lester Piggott got 3 years..

And he was a Sir at the time.

But you know 'Arry would have been on the phone to all his media mates all afternoon, giving them soundbites.

He will be potrayed as an angel in tomorrows press.

Parkhurst is the only place he will be told he has a "real pretty face"

Only two instances? I reckon they must be sample charges, and he'll ask for 127 other offences to be taken into account...

A person guilty of the offence is liable, on summary

conviction, to imprisonment for a maximum of six months or to a fine not

exceeding the statutory maximum or both and on conviction on

indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or both.

 

 

:smt023:smt039:prayer::prayer::prayer:

That is for the Statutory offence of Fraudulent Evasion of Income Tax Fraud Act 2000 s144.

However the offence of cheating the revenue is "... punishable with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine."

'Arry's going down with dirty money in the bank, dirty money in the bank, dirty money in the bank.

He's going down

He's going down

He's going

Twitchy's going down

:D:D

I would think his intention, according to his lawyer, to plead Not Guilty will not help his sentence/punishment when he is found guilty.

I say when because they do not take things like this to Court unless 100% sure.

I bet Storrie, Mandric and 'arry will run one hell of a protection racket on the inside

I would think his intention, according to his lawyer, to plead Not Guilty will not help his sentence/punishment when he is found guilty.

 

I say when because they do not take things like this to Court unless 100% sure.

 

I bet Storrie, Mandric and 'arry will run one hell of a protection racket on the inside

Quite agree, and even more so after an exhaustive 26 month investigation, I wouldn't think for a minute they would waste their time collecting evidence over this period of time just to see their man walk away with a 'Not Guilty' verdict... surely?

http://www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk/guidelines/other/courtappeal/default.asp?T=Cases&catID=8&subject=Fraud&SubSubject=Excise/Revenue%20fraud%20-%20Tax%20evasion

sounds like a prison sentence to me

 

The length of the sentence will depend on a number of factors including:

*the amount of tax evaded;

*the period of time during which the evasion took place;

*the effort made to conceal the fraud;

*whether others were drawn in and corrupted;

*the character of the offender;

*the extent (if known) of his personal gain;

*whether the offender pleaded guilty;

*the amount recovered.

40k isnt the biggest TAX dodge ever, its only 2 cases being brought against him. Did he corrupt Mandaric? (or other way round). Admittedly he is ****ed on the character aspect. He will pay the money back from a weeks wages and if he pleads guilty he will get quite a short sentence if anything at all. Now if he were to kill MM before the hearing :smt023

But he just 'wheels and deals' as all football pundits know............bollix,i hope he goes down.

Not many people seem too surprised, as everyone knows he's the most corrupt bloke in football.

Does he now have to repay the £1000 he was awarded for the old bill searching his dorset home?