Jump to content

The Incel rebellion has begun


sadoldgit
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm not an MRA. I know its easier to put people in boxes but sadly you're mistaken.

 

Odd that I somehow knew you'd be all over this thread though.

 

Also strange that you have an "alt right" avatar under which banner various types of losers fall such as Richard Spencer and incel terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd that I somehow knew you'd be all over this thread though.

 

Also strange that you have an "alt right" avatar under which banner various types of losers fall such as Richard Spencer and incel terrorists.

I see you all over any Jeremy cotlrbyn thread but I'm not labelling you a communist.

 

Pepe is only ever labelled "alt right" by thick people or people who have no understanding of its meaning. I assume you consider the kekistani flag to be racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just what we need. Another bunch of deluded psychos killing people because of their own pathetic inadequacies.

 

What about all the pathetic people that don’t kill?

 

When do we start the peace talks? Inevitably how it will end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd that I somehow knew you'd be all over this thread though.

 

Also strange that you have an "alt right" avatar under which banner various types of losers fall such as Richard Spencer and incel terrorists.

 

Tailor made for our alt right friend. As soon as I read about Incel I immediately thought of hypo, and here he is, all over it like a rash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you all over any Jeremy cotlrbyn thread but I'm not labelling you a communist.

 

Pepe is only ever labelled "alt right" by thick people or people who have no understanding of its meaning. I assume you consider the kekistani flag to be racist.

 

I find Wikipedia quite reliable, it is a common alt right symbol. To me, adding a St George's Cross with it is either trolling or extra thick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find Wikipedia quite reliable, it is a common alt right symbol. To me, adding a St George's Cross with it is either trolling or extra thick.
Indeed. The cross is extra racist you're right. Or possibly I used the image because I knew the faux outrage it would inspire in certain virtue signaller on here who would rather get in a lather about a cartoon frog image than actual violence IRL...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed. The cross is extra racist you're right. Or possibly I used the image because I knew the faux outrage it would inspire in certain virtue signaller on here who would rather get in a lather about a cartoon frog image than actual violence IRL...

 

Oh how witty, well done. I'll just change mine to swastika.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed. The cross is extra racist you're right. Or possibly I used the image because I knew the faux outrage it would inspire in certain virtue signaller on here who would rather get in a lather about a cartoon frog image than actual violence IRL...

 

To be fair, ambiguity, irony if not outright trolling is straight out of the alt-right playbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tactic employed by multiple groups. The far left and far right both favour identity politics but it doesn't make them the same thing.

 

When it’s aimed at ‘virtue-signallers’ and all the other alt-right buzzwords? The mongboard milo schtick ain’t a great look.

Edited by shurlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your evidence that I'm alt right is a frog avatar combined with the use of the phrase "virtue signaller"? (a common phrase that predates the alt rights existence.) that's pretty flimsy evidence at best...

 

Whatever you are, it's not coming across as something good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tailor made for our alt right friend. As soon as I read about Incel I immediately thought of hypo, and here he is, all over it like a rash.

 

No debate just you and your gang attacking Hypo. Ahh the liberals are so sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read some seriously odd sh_it over the years but I cannot get my melon around this. He mowed down women as he wasn't good looking enough and not getting laid?

 

Seriously, WTF!

 

Well, that's a bit silly. These blokes complain that they can't get women but if the go round crushing them with rental vans there'll be even less to go round right ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that's a bit silly. These blokes complain that they can't get women but if the go round crushing them with rental vans there'll be even less to go round right ?
I'm pretty sure the bloke had some severe mental problems. That combined with an evil ideology is a recipe for disaster as we have seen countless times recently.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your evidence that I'm alt right is a frog avatar combined with the use of the phrase "virtue signaller"? (a common phrase that predates the alt rights existence.) that's pretty flimsy evidence at best...

 

Your false equivalency on the violence in Charlottesville was rather odd.

Edited by shurlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your false equivalency on the violence in Charlottesville was rather odd.
At the risk of going over old ground again, condemning violence will mean violence coming from both the far left and the far right. Being critical of those who feel it is fine to go and punch Richard Spencer in the face doesn't mean you have to support Richard Spencer in any way or anything he stands for. I don't support people who use violent means to try to achieve their aims in almost every case short of something like self defense. The political affiliations of those involved in the violence is largely immaterial.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, ambiguity, irony if not outright trolling is straight out of the alt-right playbook.

 

The term is new to me, but reading about the latest incident that was one of the things that struck me in one of the articles I read. No intellectual or moral consistency and deny any responsibility for what you say based on being ironic.

 

The comments of some contributors on this thread came as no surprise to me; they have "form"..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No debate just you and your gang attacking Hypo. Ahh the liberals are so sweet.

 

Firstly, what "gang" are you alluding to Whelk. I am not in any gang and was simply responding to another poster. How does that makes us a "gang."

 

As for the debate, perhaps you would like to join it rather than take a rather silly pop at me? Hypo displays an alt right avatar. He constantly defends the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg, Boris Johnson and Katie Hopkins and his view of women's equality belongs in the Victorian era. He also came out with the classic line "Socialism is dangerous" yet you see fit to defend him?

 

Like many, this whole Incel thing is new to me, but clearly not to those who subscribe to these strange views. Perhaps we can have your view on the New Misogyny and the rights and wrongs of ploughing into people in a van just because women aren't cueing up to have sex with you?

 

As for your jibe at liberals, as I have said before, the world would be a much safer and better place if more people were of a liberal disposition rather than subscribing to the more extreme viewpoints, but you carry on defending the likes of hypo if that is your thing.

 

Perhaps you should change your avatar to Pepe the Frog too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, what "gang" are you alluding to Whelk. I am not in any gang and was simply responding to another poster. How does that makes us a "gang."

 

As for the debate, perhaps you would like to join it rather than take a rather silly pop at me? Hypo displays an alt right avatar. He constantly defends the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg, Boris Johnson and Katie Hopkins and his view of women's equality belongs in the Victorian era. He also came out with the classic line "Socialism is dangerous" yet you see fit to defend him?

 

Like many, this whole Incel thing is new to me, but clearly not to those who subscribe to these strange views. Perhaps we can have your view on the New Misogyny and the rights and wrongs of ploughing into people in a van just because women aren't cueing up to have sex with you?

 

As for your jibe at liberals, as I have said before, the world would be a much safer and better place if more people were of a liberal disposition rather than subscribing to the more extreme viewpoints, but you carry on defending the likes of hypo if that is your thing.

 

Perhaps you should change your avatar to Pepe the Frog too?

 

I fear my genius wit is wasted on you old boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, what "gang" are you alluding to Whelk. I am not in any gang and was simply responding to another poster. How does that makes us a "gang."

 

As for the debate, perhaps you would like to join it rather than take a rather silly pop at me? Hypo displays an alt right avatar. He constantly defends the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg, Boris Johnson and Katie Hopkins and his view of women's equality belongs in the Victorian era. He also came out with the classic line "Socialism is dangerous" yet you see fit to defend him?

 

Like many, this whole Incel thing is new to me, but clearly not to those who subscribe to these strange views. Perhaps we can have your view on the New Misogyny and the rights and wrongs of ploughing into people in a van just because women aren't cueing up to have sex with you?

 

As for your jibe at liberals, as I have said before, the world would be a much safer and better place if more people were of a liberal disposition rather than subscribing to the more extreme viewpoints, but you carry on defending the likes of hypo if that is your thing.

 

Perhaps you should change your avatar to Pepe the Frog too?

 

Rights and wrongs of ploughing into people? Don’t tell me........your not for it? Very fair minded of you.

 

Re. Liberals bringing a better world. Maybe but be careful as they too can become the mob decrying any who defy their doctrines.

 

Interesting you say I was defending hypo, he can look after himself. And then reference some avatar - you judging me on an ironic comment that you seemed too dense to understand hence your high and mighty reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do I sign up?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

There are 4 levels to MGTOW.

 

I'm currently Level 2...

 

Level 2 of mgtow is simply mgtow who enter into short term relationships instead of long term relationships like level 1 mgtow. These relationships are purely sexual ones. This stage won’t enter into a long term relationship with a woman and prefer to keep it short and simple (get in and get the hell out) Most mgtow are a mix of the first 2 levels (if i find the unicorn i may consider marriage but i still like one night stands and won’t stop till then).

 

Marriage status- f~~~ off ***** ill pay the child support but id rather go to hell then marry you.

White knight- status- Open the door yourself.

Mgtow status- the redpill dissolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 4 levels to MGTOW.

 

I'm currently Level 2...

 

Level 2 of mgtow is simply mgtow who enter into short term relationships instead of long term relationships like level 1 mgtow. These relationships are purely sexual ones. This stage won’t enter into a long term relationship with a woman and prefer to keep it short and simple (get in and get the hell out) Most mgtow are a mix of the first 2 levels (if i find the unicorn i may consider marriage but i still like one night stands and won’t stop till then).

 

Marriage status- f~~~ off ***** ill pay the child support but id rather go to hell then marry you.

White knight- status- Open the door yourself.

Mgtow status- the redpill dissolved.

 

I realise you will think differently but that sounds very sad. Guess you have been hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn liberals not wanting to run over women for not putting out.

 

SOG and Johnny with their righteous crusade against innocent people being slaughtered.

Await the ‘serial killers are bad’ thread so we will know where you stand on another controversy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 4 levels to MGTOW.

 

I'm currently Level 2...

 

Level 2 of mgtow is simply mgtow who enter into short term relationships instead of long term relationships like level 1 mgtow. These relationships are purely sexual ones. This stage won’t enter into a long term relationship with a woman and prefer to keep it short and simple (get in and get the hell out) Most mgtow are a mix of the first 2 levels (if i find the unicorn i may consider marriage but i still like one night stands and won’t stop till then).

 

Marriage status- f~~~ off ***** ill pay the child support but id rather go to hell then marry you.

White knight- status- Open the door yourself.

Mgtow status- the redpill dissolved.

You have my sympathy. I hope you can find something that makes you happy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})