View Poll Results: Choose Between Claus And Dean.

Voters
58. You may not vote on this poll
  • Claus Lundekvam

    42 72.41%
  • Dean Richards

    16 27.59%
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Saints Greatest XI - Dave Watson's B-Team CB Partner

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lordswood
    Posts
    10,143

    Default Saints Greatest XI - Dave Watson's B-Team CB Partner

    Yes, there's been a tie. I've been wondering if it would happen, and I suppose it was bound to in the slightly minor area of equal 4th place. Dave Watson needs his CB partner. So, all those that have voted before, for other players, let's vote again to decide this one. There's a few stats to help you make up your mind.

    Silky - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_Lundekvam

    Deano - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Richards_(footballer)

    Once again, let me remind you. Vote for the player you believe to have been of higher quality, in terms of effective performance and contribution to the team. Put aside any legendary cult status please. That's for another poll, another time.

    Voting ends tomorrow at 3pm
    Last edited by St Landrew; 06-12-2008 at 02:02 AM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Taking the hobbits to Isengard
    Posts
    9,155

    Default

    Deano. Despite the whole Spurs affair and Claus's long service to the club, I think it's fair to say Deano was better.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bournemouth
    Posts
    8,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arizona View Post
    Deano. Despite the whole Spurs affair and Claus's long service to the club, I think it's fair to say Deano was better.
    Deano's record when not at Saints?

    And also the concept that Claus made his CB partner look better through his own quality?

    My own thoughts are that Claus is oft underated for this...

    For these reasons he gets my vote...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lordswood
    Posts
    10,143

    Default

    This is a toughie. Both are great defenders, and are very different in style. Both would ably perform in any great Saints team with the right partner. Claus's perfect partner was Michael Svensson, and Dean Richards never looked better than when he played alongside Claus. It's possible Deano's style might suit Dave Watson better, but we're not concerned with players fitting a team, at this moment. We're voting for best individuals. This is our Gerrard and Lampard dilemma.

    I'm going for Claus. 40 caps for Norway is a huge statement about his quality, and no other Norwegian has played anywhere near so many top level matches in the English game. He just edges it for me.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    8,861

    Default

    You must be joking

    In the forty five years supporting Saints this pair were nowhere near the top 5

    Claus was a lightweight


    Richards Overated

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Totton
    Posts
    1,462

    Default

    Difficult choice as Deano's form was temperory & Claus was permenant
    just look at Dean'o after he left for " those north london yobos " a clasic comment from Lowe

  7. #7

    Default

    Dave Watson was a big ball winning, fairly mobile, centre half, who went for most of the aerial challenges. Claus was mobile and more of a secondary sweeping centre half, I think they would complement each other. Dave Watson whilst stll an international, probably had his best years before joining Saints.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Near Brighton
    Posts
    3,300

    Default

    Claus for me.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Windsor...ish.
    Posts
    12,475

    Default

    Deano. As peed off as we all were about his transfer to Spurs, I don't blame him. I was more annoyed at Hoddle who buggered off and then signed him.

    You can't ignore that fact we made 8 million for him, and that he was a free transfer when we got him, and that he put in some good performances and solidified our defence.

    Claus had his knockers in our relegation season, but as many people have said before, he was never the dominant centre-back. A good 10 years service, but Richards was better.

  10. #10

    Default

    Dean Richards without a shadow of doubt. Claus was a decent player but he was always at his best with a more gifted, gutsy centre-back along side him and Richards was that defender.

    Dont get me wrong, Cluas is a legend. At his best, he could have gone on to bigger things but remained loyal but Dean Richards was quality. Despite the circumstances in which he left in.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lordswood
    Posts
    10,143

    Default

    Thanks for your votes, people. Claus has done it by a huge margin. Can't say he was that much better, if at all, but then we could have all agreed, and he could have strolled it with not a vote against him. Perhaps Deano will be on the subs bench. Pop along here http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5823 to see the line ups so far.
    Last edited by St Landrew; 06-12-2008 at 03:23 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •