Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Which one player would be the worst to lose to injury now?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    5 metres outside the detailed bit on Google Earth
    Posts
    3,819

    Default Which one player would be the worst to lose to injury now?

    There are several players whose improved performance seems to be a major factor in our improved play. Which could we least do without?

    Surely there are strong arguments for McCarthy, Stephens, Bednarek, Bertrand, JWP, Armstrong and Ings. There's a fair chance at least one will be out for a bit. Who do we hope it's not?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    West of Fareham
    Posts
    13,034

    Default

    Obviously Ings.

  3. Default

    It would have to be Ings because his goals are so critical and we don't have another regular scorer.

    Second place for me would be JWP because his form has been instrumental in our recovery and in making the new formation work without totally exposing the defence.

    Sent from my moto g(7) play using Tapatalk

  4. #4

    Default

    Ings and its not even close. Discounting him probably Bednarek/Stephens, Bertrand or JWP as those are the positions we don't have a decent replacement in.

    Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk

  5. #5

    Default

    McCarthy.


    Even Ings won’t be able to outscore the goals that Gunn will let in.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Was NI now Shropshire..!
    Posts
    8,416

    Default

    Struggling with this one, I'm gonna need some time to think about it.

    Sent from my SM-T590 using Tapatalk

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sunny Dubai
    Posts
    10,501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    VAR?

  8. #8

    Default

    Hard to narrow it down to one player - our squad is on a knife-edge in so many positions.

    If either full back gets injured, we're screwed. It sounds as though the manager wants that addressing this window as priority number one.

    Hojbjerg and Ward-Prowse are our whole midfield now. If either gets injured or suspended, human wheelie bin Romeu is the only alternative and there goes our pressing game.

    And obviously Ings is our only forward who scores.

    Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

  9. #9

    Default

    JWP has surprised me, he is the 'engine' or the hub round which it all turns. No wonder he is first on RH team sheet, Danny has surprised me even more, I thought we had been cornered by Liverpool into buying a crock. Those two need to keep fit

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    22,591

    Default

    Stephens, JWP or Ings. Spine and leadership of the team and not sufficient replacements for any.

    For clubs like us, and a few above us like Wolves, Leicester, a successful season will always be able luck with injuries. Leicester look far lesser without Ndidi for instance. Our best starting 11 is decent and will give most teams a good game.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    After moving around Kent, Surrey and Sussex have now settled on the edge of Romney Marsh
    Posts
    13,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ericofarabia View Post
    VAR?

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adriansfc View Post
    Stephens, JWP or Ings. Spine and leadership of the team and not sufficient replacements for any.

    For clubs like us, and a few above us like Wolves, Leicester, a successful season will always be able luck with injuries. Leicester look far lesser without Ndidi for instance. Our best starting 11 is decent and will give most teams a good game.
    And all English as well as the Goalkeeper - how many teams can say that!

  13. #13

    Default

    The turn around in form as others have identified has been largely down to the routine pic n mixing of lineups. With outfield players there maybe some benefits but for defences, good form is built on consistency, understanding of others’ game and implementing structure. None of these things are achieved in defence without a routine roll call of players, let alone square pegs in round holes.

    In addition the majors contributors to the turnaround have been McCarthy in goal, JWP finding his end of season form back and truly being a box to boxer and Danny Ings up front.

    I would argue those 3 players have become vital to the team now.

    Yes Stephens has improved but to be honest he couldn’t get any worse. He’s improved vastly but any other half decent cb could come in and easily fill his boots with the norganisation the defence now has.

    Hojbjerg intercepts well but lacks passing ability and a bit of pace for someone in his key position.

    On the whole, Ralph has done a fantastic job

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    i could spit on man city's stadium
    Posts
    506

    Default

    Yawn.....

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    On the frontline in Locks Heath
    Posts
    6,845

    Default

    Ings and does the Pope wear a funny hat?

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RedArmy View Post
    McCarthy.


    Even Ings won’t be able to outscore the goals that Gunn will let in.
    lol....bless

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Southampton, United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ozzmeister View Post
    And all English as well as the Goalkeeper - how many teams can say that!
    Yeah, he conveniently forgets McCarthy as he's not in the top GK bracket like Forster or Gunn (who is young, therefore guaranteed to improve).

  18. #18

    Default

    Over the years people have started threads like " who's your favourite ever Saints player with a bald head or a beard " etc. This one is up there with them.

  19. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hackedoff View Post
    Over the years people have started threads like " who's your favourite ever Saints player with a bald head or a beard " etc. This one is up there with them.
    er... David Armstrong and Nick Holmes

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •