Jump to content
Kaiser Soze

Matt Targett - Joins Aston Villa (Official)

Recommended Posts

IMO it would be complete and utter madness to select Targett ahead of Bertrand, should that occur.

 

Agree with this. Targett has improved, but he’s not great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TOP TARGETT Aston Villa eye £10m bid for Southampton left-back Matt Targett as Dean Smith continues transfer spending spree: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9275947/aston-villa-southampton-matt-targett-dean-smith/

 

Interesting that he would be brought in as competition and not the starter - which is exactly what he is here?

 

Mings anyone? Personally I thought he looked good when I watched Villa play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting that he would be brought in as competition and not the starter - which is exactly what he is here?

 

Mings anyone? Personally I thought he looked good when I watched Villa play.

Mings is a Bournemouth player who has been on loan to Villa for last season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mings is ****e.

He really isn't. We should have signed him when he was at Ipswich, but doubt that he would come back anyway, we did treat him rather shabbily when he was with us as a youngster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He really isn't. We should have signed him when he was at Ipswich, but doubt that he would come back anyway, we did treat him rather shabbily when he was with us as a youngster.

 

 

What makes you think that? I struggle to believe his claim he was released for being to small. He was at the academy at the same time as a lot of tiny players who the club didn't release. I think it is more likely he was deemed at the time to not be good enough and he uses the height story to cover that up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep but do you think hcdajfu?

 

Mings is ****e.

 

Probbaly better than all of our lot tbf.

 

I think he's probably better than some of what we have but not as good as we should be aiming for. To my mind if he were really good then he wouldn't have been out on loan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends how well the club rate Vokins and whether they think he is ready to step up and be back up to Bertrand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depends how well the club rate Vokins and whether they think he is ready to step up and be back up to Bertrand.

 

Pretty much what I said too. Hard to sign a ‘Targett replacement’ who’s got real potential to challenge Berty for £10m.

 

Vokins stepping up would mean we’d have an extra £10m to put down on a striker or centre-back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think he's probably better than some of what we have but not as good as we should be aiming for. To my mind if he were really good then he wouldn't have been out on loan.

 

Wasn’t the loan because of the injury and that he wasn’t going to get game time at Bournemouth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pretty much what I said too. Hard to sign a ‘Targett replacement’ who’s got real potential to challenge Berty for £10m.

 

Vokins stepping up would mean we’d have an extra £10m to put down on a striker or centre-back.

James Justin would be ideal as can play RB and LB but sounds like he is Leicester bound.

 

If only Targett had a right foot he woulf have got so many more appearances in the last couple of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wasn’t the loan because of the injury and that he wasn’t going to get game time at Bournemouth?

 

Now you're getting above my pay grade but You're probably right:

 

 

"After joining from Ipswich for an £8million transfer fee in 2015, the centre-back suffered a knee ligament injury on his Cherries debut, which kept him out for more than a year, while he was ruled out for eight months with a back problem last

season."

 

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/sport/17664648.tyrone-mings-believes-aston-villa-loan-has-refreshed-his-career/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James Justin would be ideal as can play RB and LB but sounds like he is Leicester bound.

decent shout, although I think he played quite a few games further forward and on the other side. I guess that shows his versatility. The Norwich fullbacks would be the ideal signings in terms of youth and promise, but fat chance of that now they have been promoted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm heavily in favour of Voskins coming in if Target is sold. Makes total sense and like SuperSAINT said, we can use the money where its needed. Plus Voskins looks a real prospect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised no one has mentioned Sam McQueen! If Targett is sold then surely McQueen becomes the automatic reserve left back? That saves Vokins from the pressure of expecting to come in if Betrand is injured but also gives him the incentive to try and challenge McQueen first before he is expected to challenge Bertrand.

Personally, I have always preferred McQueen to Targett, though I think Targett has shown some promise at times when used in the last couple of years. Admittedly, though, McQueen did start out on the left wing and in the past year or two he seems to have reverted to that position. It remains to be seen how Hassenhuttle sees him and whether he rates him at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Surprised no one has mentioned Sam McQueen! If Targett is sold then surely McQueen becomes the automatic reserve left back? That saves Vokins from the pressure of expecting to come in if Betrand is injured but also gives him the incentive to try and challenge McQueen first before he is expected to challenge Bertrand.

Personally, I have always preferred McQueen to Targett, though I think Targett has shown some promise at times when used in the last couple of years. Admittedly, though, McQueen did start out on the left wing and in the past year or two he seems to have reverted to that position. It remains to be seen how Hassenhuttle sees him and whether he rates him at all.

 

Good shout - I’d forgotten about Sam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://bit.ly/2WAKXOL

 

Bit of a concern. To think we may have offers over £10m for Matt Targett and then decide not to sell him but to sell Bertrand instead is quite baffling.

 

The simple facts:

 

1. Targett is a poor PL player who has looked average as a LWB and consistently struggled as a LB due to weaknesses that cannot be improved.

 

2. Bertrand is a good PL player, solid defensively with quality going forward.

 

Sell Bertrand and we instantly make the first team weaker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://bit.ly/2WAKXOL

 

Bit of a concern. To think we may have offers over £10m for Matt Targett and then decide not to sell him but to sell Bertrand instead is quite baffling.

 

The simple facts:

 

1. Targett is a poor PL player who has looked average as a LWB and consistently struggled as a LB due to weaknesses that cannot be improved.

 

2. Bertrand is a good PL player, solid defensively with quality going forward.

 

Sell Bertrand and we instantly make the first team weaker.

 

Agree.

 

An interesting dilemma. We’ve already discussed the Vokins aspect on here.

 

The biggest question from this article is how much would we get IF Berty left? As that (I assume) would go into reinvesting into other positions.

 

The article indicates not a huge fee. I think in that case it’s not worth selling him.

I suppose it all comes down to what Ralph thinks.

 

I’ve also always been curious who would want Berty in the top end of the Prem (as everyone is obsessed with young fullbacks now).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With RB being 30 soon and a short contract I doubt we'd get much more for him than Targett who imo isn't quite good enough so selling Targett makes more sense. That said, I think Mcqueen will really suit RH style and him and Vokins is a great prospect too. Something has to give and if we don't get decent offers for Targett I could see RB being moved on as we can't have 4 LB's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does Bertrand want to go?
From stories i heard, he wasn't expected to be here last season. Targett was going to be first choice, McQueen second.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://bit.ly/2WAKXOL

 

Bit of a concern. To think we may have offers over £10m for Matt Targett and then decide not to sell him but to sell Bertrand instead is quite baffling.

 

The simple facts:

 

1. Targett is a poor PL player who has looked average as a LWB and consistently struggled as a LB due to weaknesses that cannot be improved.

 

2. Bertrand is a good PL player, solid defensively with quality going forward.

 

Sell Bertrand and we instantly make the first team weaker.

 

Depends if Ralph thinks he can recruit better from Bundesliga or elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depends if Ralph thinks he can recruit better from Bundesliga or elsewhere.

 

I *think* the theory is if Berty goes, we wouldn’t recruit another left-back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sell Matt keep Bertie. I’d rather let Bertie go for nowt in 2 years (and he has been a good servant for us) as we still have McQueen and vokins- one of which could over take Bertie in the 2 years. That gives us money to invest and keeps the experience of Bertie in the team and with competition for his place.

 

Win win in my book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we sell Bertrand we'll lose one of our last genuinely quality players... If we sell Targett we lose a decent squad player.

 

Looks like it's goodbye to Bertie then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless the fee we get for Bertrand is going to be substantially higher than Targett, like 2x or more, so like £25 million or so, then it seems pointless.

 

Its very clear Bertrand is better than Targett, as soon as he was fit he took over the spot and played pretty much every game.

 

Plus it does not sound like he wants to leave, whilst Targett wants first team football.

 

So to me it seems obvious to keep the better player, have Vokins as his understudy, sell Targett for as much as possible, re-invest that elsewhere and in two years either Bertrand gets a new 1-2 year deal or we let him go cheaply and Vokins is hopefully ready to take over the first team slot.

 

As others have said, swapping Bertrand for Targett permanently makes use weaker, and you are then putting a 23 year old in the way of a 19 year old, so Vokins would never have a chance to take the spot unless Targett basically got a lot worse, by which point we'd probably have to buy a replacement.

 

The only scenario I can see Bertrand going is if he wants to go OR we get a big offer for him, neither of which seems likely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I *think* the theory is if Berty goes, we wouldn’t recruit another left-back.

 

I flippin' well hope we do. If we don't it leaves us with Valery and Targett as two inexperienced and not all that fantastic full backs with basically nothing in reserve except Vokins and Stephens. :?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I flippin' well hope we do. If we don't it leaves us with Valery and Targett as two inexperienced and not all that fantastic full backs with basically nothing in reserve except Vokins and Stephens. :?

 

I have no real issues with Valery being our first choice right back, the speed he has progressed in the last 6 months makes me think a full season next year under Ralph's training and we'll be struggling to hold on to him this time next year.

 

I also quite like that we are trying to identify pathways into the first team for our academy players, its looks almost certain that our back up full backs next year are going to be Vokins and Ramsey, and I think that is a good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no real issues with Valery being our first choice right back, the speed he has progressed in the last 6 months makes me think a full season next year under Ralph's training and we'll be struggling to hold on to him this time next year.

 

I also quite like that we are trying to identify pathways into the first team for our academy players, its looks almost certain that our back up full backs next year are going to be Vokins and Ramsey, and I think that is a good thing.

 

I don't have a problem with Valery being first choice but he is still young, inexperienced and 38 PL games is asking a lot physically and mentally. He will have injuries and patches of poor form, we need the option of resting and rotating him when needed. Ramsay is completely unproven and Stephens is awful as cover options.

 

I just don't want to find us with a knock to Valery, playing a back four of Targett, Bednarek, Vestegaard and Ramsay. That's weak, inexperienced and we'd probably end up changing the whole system to enable a back five to cover our frailties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I’ve seen Vokins he’s looked very capable of the step up, although perhaps more in a defensive manner rather than as WB.

 

like the sound of this. Has he got genuine pace?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't have a problem with Valery being first choice but he is still young, inexperienced and 38 PL games is asking a lot physically and mentally. He will have injuries and patches of poor form, we need the option of resting and rotating him when needed. Ramsay is completely unproven and Stephens is awful as cover options.

 

I just don't want to find us with a knock to Valery, playing a back four of Targett, Bednarek, Vestegaard and Ramsay. That's weak, inexperienced and we'd probably end up changing the whole system to enable a back five to cover our frailties.

 

From what little I have seen of Ramsey looks a little bit of a fish out of water at right back. He looks more of a centre back to me, although I'm not convinced he is ready to do a job their.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
like the sound of this. Has he got genuine pace?
Can't say for certain that he's out and out fast - busy is perhaps a better word. I think he's got a touch of Chilwell about him, from what I've seen. Obviously less developed and not at that level yet, but there's something to work with for sure.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

selling Bertrand is madness IMO. He is a quality player and at some point you need consider talent on the pitch is more important than figures on the balance sheet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can't say for certain that he's out and out fast - busy is perhaps a better word. I think he's got a touch of Chilwell about him, from what I've seen. Obviously less developed and not at that level yet, but there's something to work with for sure.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Chilwell looks a proper player to me.

is he quicker than Target?

 

What about built? Is he a big strong lad or more of a wippet type?

How is he in the air and does he have the first touch for this level?

 

 

The really top class fullbacks and pacey and tremendous judgement on distances, knowing when to jump into the tackle and when to drop off. How is his decision making?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chilwell looks a proper player to me.

is he quicker than Target?

 

What about built? Is he a big strong lad or more of a wippet type?

How is he in the air and does he have the first touch for this level?

 

 

The really top class fullbacks and pacey and tremendous judgement on distances, knowing when to jump into the tackle and when to drop off. How is his decision making?

He's not tall - he's about Luke Shaw sized. But minus the Happy Meal addiction.

 

Aerially, he's going to have learn to box clever, but that's true of most full backs. They're rarely towering six footers. I imagine adapting to the physical side of first team football will be his first hurdle to overcome.

 

Good touch, very willing worker up and down the line. Wouldn't say his delivery stands out as being above and beyond expectation - Targett's always had a lovely cross on him - but he's a nice looking footballer, comfortable on the ball, gets about the pitch, plenty of hustle.

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
selling Bertrand is madness IMO. He is a quality player and at some point you need consider talent on the pitch is more important than figures on the balance sheet.

This. RB is perfect for a club our size, a quality player but who isn't quite so brilliant that the big boys have taken him off us. Even if he goes for a free in 2 years he's been a great professional, a good buy and served us well. Hopefully he can be convinced to sign an extension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With our system the Wing backs need to be the fittest players on the pitch.

IMHO Bertrand is not getting forward as much as he used too because he’s not getting any younger.

That might be your reason why we are listening to offers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This. RB is perfect for a club our size, a quality player but who isn't quite so brilliant that the big boys have taken him off us. Even if he goes for a free in 2 years he's been a great professional, a good buy and served us well. Hopefully he can be convinced to sign an extension.

 

Agreed, say we sell him for £15million, we're basically saying that having him for two years is worth less than that.

Having said that I seem to have more faith in Targett than most. I won't be too worried either way but if we do sell Bertrand i'd hope that we'd push for £20million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't have a problem with Valery being first choice but he is still young, inexperienced and 38 PL games is asking a lot physically and mentally. He will have injuries and patches of poor form, we need the option of resting and rotating him when needed. Ramsay is completely unproven and Stephens is awful as cover options.

 

I just don't want to find us with a knock to Valery, playing a back four of Targett, Bednarek, Vestegaard and Ramsay. That's weak, inexperienced and we'd probably end up changing the whole system to enable a back five to cover our frailties.

 

Depending on formation JWP actually covered right back/right back decently IMO. I'm not sure I'd necessarily want him playing as RB in a back 4, but I think in a back 5 where wingbacks have a little more defensive cover behind them he did pretty well.

 

He's not tall - he's about Luke Shaw sized.

 

 

Luke Shaw is big for most full backs, he is 6' 1"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://bit.ly/2WAKXOL

 

Bit of a concern. To think we may have offers over £10m for Matt Targett and then decide not to sell him but to sell Bertrand instead is quite baffling.

 

The simple facts:

 

1. Targett is a poor PL player who has looked average as a LWB and consistently struggled as a LB due to weaknesses that cannot be improved.

 

2. Bertrand is a good PL player, solid defensively with quality going forward.

 

Sell Bertrand and we instantly make the first team weaker.

 

Think I'd rather we sold Bertrand while still can. He's 29 and it's probably the last transfer window we'd get a decent fee for him. He's not been as good in the past season or two as he has previously, he's fallen out of the England squad and is a player on the decline.

 

I think Targett's improved in the past season or two and he's going in the opposite trajectory. He's a real threat going forwards, with good pace and a quality cross. I'm not sure how you can know any defensive weakness can't be improved? It would be interesting to see the stats over the past couple of seasons for comparisson, I feel as if Targett's done well with assists at least.

 

An option I'd quite like to see would be to keep both and possibly try Targett playing ahead of Bertrand as a left winger with them overlapping and covering for each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luke Shaw is big for most full backs, he is 6' 1"

 

Never in a million years is he 6' 1". Horizontally, perhaps.

 

In any case, he was (from memory) of not dissimilar stature to Vokins when he played for us.

 

 

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})