Jump to content
Hamilton Saint

Saints vs West Ham: Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Nothing to do with Puel IMO - board's failure to sign a defender has cost us. I doubt any manager would do much better. Can't blame the manager for players making individual errors.

And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it wasn't for the league cup, I suspect the clamour for Puel to go would be deafening.

 

If we lose our next game he simple has to go , Cup final or not ! You can't kèep a manager with his league record !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought oh Kat's looking quite hot but then realised it was one of the Davids' wives.

 

Ha ha - thought the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel?

Indeed. Even when we had a good defence we looked dire. This defence problem is a new one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm normally just 'disappointed' after a defeat, but today I feel annoyed and really quite cross because of the way we just caved in. In fact, we just stopped trying, it seems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Six out of seven losses is not very pleasing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel?

 

Would be referee bias

Bad luck

Injuries

And Jamie Vardy

 

We will bounce back and win the championship EASY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's a shame that people seem quite happy because they've been proven correct.

 

You sad, sad people.

 

Not at all. The difference is we have been playing poor since November. You base your predictions off of hope, we all want to win. But if you lose 50% of your games logic says chances are you are not that good. When you get beat by Palace, Burnley, Hull, Swansea etc I think saying "we will beat xyz easily" is delusion. You and Always have been wrong for a very very longtime. But it isnt about what is right or wrong it is about judging what you see. 7 defeats in our last 8, 3 points from the last 24 etc tells me we are not as good as you say we are. I don't mean to be critical of you as you want the club to win just as I do. But we are a very poor team with a poor manager so is it surprising we are in freefall?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

six defeats in seven premier league games would surely get most owners/chairmen twitchy??? and the amount of goals we have conceded under puel!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing to do with Puel IMO - board's failure to sign a defender has cost us. I doubt any manager would do much better. Can't blame the manager for players making individual errors.

 

Will you stop talking rubbish he team plays in the managers image, he picks the team , sets them up and trains them ! Reed maybe at fault for not signing a Cb but he doesn't make us play the awful football we are .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 points out of 21 is our record over the last 7 games. It's a complete joke and still people defend Puel. He's paid a massive salary and the buck stops with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Six out of seven losses is not very pleasing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It's what happens when average teams get to Cup Finals. Haven't looked it up but it seems that it's a pretty regular occurence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO

 

Do they pick the team, take training and decide the tactics as well then - didn't know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's 6 of the last 7 league games lost. Keep that up and we'll endup with 33 points.

 

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Edited by Shroppie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel?

 

Personally, I think he's been hindered. Firstly, by the Europa League, which historically has always had an effect on teams. Secondly, by the board's failure to a) not sign an additional striker in the summer and b) not sign a defender in January

 

Nevertheless, with this squad, and particularly with the attacking options we've got, we shouldn't be relegated, and I don't think we will. We're only 4 points away from 9th - plenty of time to turn this around.

 

We do need to win at Sunderland though. The team is lacking in confidence obviously and we need to get a good result going into the cup final.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First time I've left a match early, the football has been dire for the last few months with endless sideways passing and lack of movement off the ball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's W.Ham's first win at St. Marys. We lost to an average team, again. I'd suggest that Les relieve Puel of his duties but he'd probably just replace him with Black.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forster has to take all the responsibility for that 3rd goal, for not setting the wall up right. The way it was set out, we basically invited Noble to hit it, knowing full well that the slightest touch would put it in the net.

 

I think Forster has to take responsibility for a lot of goals going in this season....Today is the day I officially start to worry about our Prem safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO

 

What's it got to do with Ralph and Kat? One is just a figurehead and we know very well that the other doesn't want to put any more money into the club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing to do with Puel IMO - board's failure to sign a defender has cost us. I doubt any manager would do much better. Can't blame the manager for players making individual errors.

 

Have you looked at our recent form? It simply cannot be nothing to do with Puel. To say otherwise is just ridiculous. Change the record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not at all. The difference is we have been playing poor since November. You base your predictions off of hope, we all want to win. But if you lose 50% of your games logic says chances are you are not that good. When you get beat by Palace, Burnley, Hull, Swansea etc I think saying "we will beat xyz easily" is delusion. You and Always have been wrong for a very very longtime. But it isnt about what is right or wrong it is about judging what you see. 7 defeats in our last 8, 3 points from the last 24 etc tells me we are not as good as you say we are. I don't mean to be critical of you as you want the club to win just as I do. But we are a very poor team with a poor manager so is it surprising we are in freefall?

 

Why ignore the two Liverpool wins? They don't fit into your theory? Why are you deliberately ignoring them?

 

As I said, it's quite pathetic from your point of view (and others) that you are so happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO

 

I agree! But Puel is the one who coaches and sets up the team. We look clueless and I afraid that our form s down to him. 6 defeats in 7 is not good enough cup final or not, he has got to go before we are dragged into the relegation dogfight (I've said it for months that we are already in it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you looked at our recent form? It simply cannot be nothing to do with Puel. To say otherwise is just ridiculous. Change the record.

 

I don't think there is too much wrong with the tactics or the players picked.

 

If you go back and look through the pre-match threads, people generally have been pretty happy with the team selections.

 

Ironically, I'd say when people seem to think before the match that Puel has got it wrong, we end up winning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'Not too much wrong with tactics'. Wow

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think there is too much wrong with the tactics or the players picked.

 

If you go back and look through the pre-match threads, people generally have been pretty happy with the team selections.

 

Ironically, I'd say when people seem to think before the match that Puel has got it wrong, we end up winning.

 

Not too much wrong with the tactics?! Were you at the game today? I presume not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've quit a job without another to go to because it's been ****. It's quite common.

 

With all due respect - I doubt you're anywhere near the same employment bracket as Claud Puel.

 

If you were doing his job - right now, you would not quit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not too much wrong with the tactics?! Were you at the game today? I presume not.

 

What would you have done differently then? As I said, before the match, people were pretty happy with the team.

 

After that, it's up to the players to perform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})