Jump to content
SuperSAINT

January Transfer Window - 2020 Edition

Recommended Posts

Lyn Oslo striker Tubold Breddi
Not Mitchell bakker

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mitchell Bakker - left back at PSG
Seems pointless. Is he better than Vokins or are we loaning him out??

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems pointless. Is he better than Vokins or are we loaning him out??

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

Would rather see Vokins given minutes, but moving from Ajax to PSG means he obviously has something about him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems pointless. Is he better than Vokins

 

 

Was just about to say that. Ralph made it clear at the fans forum that Vokins isn't 'premier league ready' yet, so we needed to get someone in who is. Not sure how a 19 year old that hasn't yet featured for PSG would tick that box either...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be that Bertrand's fate has been decided and this bloke is being brought in to compete with Vokins for a starting spot next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did we ever hire the 'recruitment expert' that was often mentioned?

 

No because he isn’t available as per fans forum Martin Glover doing January recruitment

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No because he isn’t available as per fans forum Martin Glover doing January recruitment

 

Wasn't that referring to Matt Crocker? (Recruitment guy was supposedly a separate appointment)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wasn't that referring to Matt Crocker? (Recruitment guy was supposedly a separate appointment)

 

No Crocker is replacing Les new guy Wilson I think

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did we ever hire the 'recruitment expert' that was often mentioned?

 

New guy is with a club until summertime

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The trouble is - we will get to the summer and still do nothing...... our fans bore me, how many times are we prepared to make excuses for our owner - it taken over a year to ge mahele done - people said last Jan ot would get down on the summer, now Jan and it goes on.....

 

Ahhh good. The adults are speaking. Totally agree. Some people have such low expectations, you question their agenda or mindset as it’s rare for fans at ground level (ie: the pub, social circles, the stadium) to have such a patient or pro club stance looking at recent history. Maybe they just simply have low aspirations and no ambition and there is nothing wrong with that.

 

As a club, we constantly move the goal posts. Or the rumour mill does because we can’t ever blame the club as they rarely ever speak. So, the clue is to never utter a word and you can’t be blamed for anything. Politicians take note.

 

DT - I find it strange also how rumours came into the press from some source about 30 - 35 million. War chest was an inappropriate superlative used. Maybe total fabrication press tripe, paper selling conjecture. Now we have 1 player, possibly. It’s ever changing. You can’t pin the club to anything as they never attribute words or interviews to anything, not directly anymore. We can plenty of conflicting, third hand rumour. Hence the Vladislav Surkov analogy.

 

Boring I know. Please just sign a full back. Contrary to some of the less considered comments, we desperately need cover & it should be equal to or an upgrade from Bertrand. Even Ralph himself acknowledges this. RB position is weak too as is CB but January is not ideal to address all 3. Maehle sounds a much better bet than this utility full back from Bordeaux but i’m hoping this is a smokescreen. When clubs offer out a player, it makes me immediately apprehensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did we ever hire the 'recruitment expert' that was often mentioned?

 

I think the board will likely appoint him in February. That seems their mentality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the board will likely appoint him in February. That seems their mentality

 

Watch the fans night YouTube thingy. Won’t happen til the summer as the clubs target(s) are currently with other clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Watch the fans night YouTube thingy. Won’t happen til the summer as the clubs target(s) are currently with other clubs.

 

Do you have a link? Assume you mean the playing trading/recruitment head akin to the Ross Wilson role. Hoping the defenders will be brought in as I don’t think the fans have much patience left for these ever diminishing carrots the PR groups like to dangle and decrease in stature

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you have a link? Assume you mean the playing trading/recruitment head akin to the Ross Wilson role. Hoping the defenders will be brought in as I don’t think the fans have much patience left for these ever diminishing carrots the PR groups like to dangle and decrease in stature

 

There’s a thread on here with a link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From that link on Bakker:

 

 

“Mitchel Bakker is quick, both in terms of physical pace and in-match intelligence. Combine this with his good passing technique and you get a very competent left-back in a high-pressing, ball-playing-focused defensive line.”

 

Clear concerns around a lack of experience, but in terms of a player profile that sounds spot on. Interesting either way! Wonder whether it’s a loan/ perm / loan with perm option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still seems odd though, if it's a loan with no option to buy then we are getting cover at left back that has no top flight experience at all, to help develop a player for PSG.

 

If he's moving for more chance at first team football and there is a deal to buy/loan with option to buy etc. , then he must know he is moving as back up and we must not have much hope in Vokins if we are getting someone pretty much the same age, and we are still getting a back up with no experience.

 

You also have to wonder at the mentality of a player who gave up probably one of the best routes from academy to first team football in the world at Ajax to move to money bags PSG where he would have far less chance of first team football as they buy ready made defenders.

 

He's not even played for Holland U19s, U20s or U21s either and second division football in Holland is probably League 2 level at best.

 

Doesn't fill me with much hope, the most positive thing I can say about him is he's big for a full back, 6' 2".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Go on YouTube and type in 'Southampton FC fan forum' into the search bar
U really are a bell[emoji773]

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From that link on Bakker:

 

 

“Mitchel Bakker is quick, both in terms of physical pace and in-match intelligence. Combine this with his good passing technique and you get a very competent left-back in a high-pressing, ball-playing-focused defensive line.”

 

Clear concerns around a lack of experience, but in terms of a player profile that sounds spot on. Interesting either way! Wonder whether it’s a loan/ perm / loan with perm option.

Google has said this is a loan!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still seems odd though, if it's a loan with no option to buy then we are getting cover at left back that has no top flight experience at all, to help develop a player for PSG.

".

 

It's really not that odd being that people suggest and recommend we do exactly the same thing with our own young players all the time for years and years and years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's really not that odd being that people suggest and recommend we do exactly the same thing with our own young players all the time for years and years and years.

 

That isn't relevant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's really not that odd being that people suggest and recommend we do exactly the same thing with our own young players all the time for years and years and years.

 

The difference being that we send our young players to a team where they will be first choice to get experience. If we were to send Josh Sims to Leeds or something so he could warm their bench instead of ours for 6 months with little chance of meaningful minutes we'd be equally confused. This guy won't play above Bertrand likely in the next 6 months so what's the point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The difference being that we send our young players to a team where they will be first choice to get experience. If we were to send Josh Sims to Leeds or something so he could warm their bench instead of ours for 6 months with little chance of meaningful minutes we'd be equally confused. This guy won't play above Bertrand likely in the next 6 months so what's the point?

 

What if Bertrand gets injured or suspended Vokins looks very small with Cedric our defence will look u12s

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The difference being that we send our young players to a team where they will be first choice to get experience. If we were to send Josh Sims to Leeds or something so he could warm their bench instead of ours for 6 months with little chance of meaningful minutes we'd be equally confused. This guy won't play above Bertrand likely in the next 6 months so what's the point?

 

That presumes Bertrand stays fit for the rest of the season. What are the odds on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that we shouldn't get someone in, I'm just saying what's the point in loaning an inexperienced teenager for cover? We don't get any of the rewards for developing him and from PSG's perspective there is every chance he won't get developed as Bertrand will probably play most games, its a lose lose situation. It would make more sense for us to loan a reliable if uninspiring journeyman as cover and for PSG to send their teenager where he is guaranteed to get regular first team football.

 

From this I'd say its more likely we will get an option/obligation to buy or it will just be a permanent deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right back and left back would be nice. Surprised Ralph didn't want to have proper look at Harrison Reed this season, could be a useful squad player and suit his system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Go on YouTube and type in 'Southampton FC fan forum' into the search bar

 

Thank you. I’ll check it out when I have a free moment this eve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can tell just after PSG signed him they disbanded their reserve/U23 team, so Bakker had to play U19 football which was probably a level beneath him, so he needs games and has lost his NL Youth spot due to not playing.

 

A loan only makes sense if either:

 

A.) Its a cheap cover for Bertrand, who will play every game if fit between now and the end of the season and Bakker can get some U23 games whilst PSG figure out what to do with him.

 

B.) it has a purchase option for the summer and gives us a chance to look at him in the U23s between now and then. Either the club see him as potentially better than Vokins as a second choice, or a potential Bertrand replacement when RB leaves.

 

A lot depends on Bertrand's future this summer as to whether we need a backup challenger or a first choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying that we shouldn't get someone in, I'm just saying what's the point in loaning an inexperienced teenager for cover? We don't get any of the rewards for developing him and from PSG's perspective there is every chance he won't get developed as Bertrand will probably play most games, its a lose lose situation. It would make more sense for us to loan a reliable if uninspiring journeyman as cover and for PSG to send their teenager where he is guaranteed to get regular first team football.

 

From this I'd say its more likely we will get an option/obligation to buy or it will just be a permanent deal.

 

Bertrand isn't getting any younger, plus he's wanted to leave for at least two years. This guy sounds the sort of player that that fits the mould of what we Ralph wants, we get to look at him, make sure he's good enough, fits the dynamic of the dressing room and if he's not we don't have to sign them, Hard to see what's not to like about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a loan with a view to purchase, so long as we tie it down better than we did for Toby, seems the ideal scenario for most signings to me. Just like any normal job, a trial period gives the employer a chance to see what the player is all about at close quarters and get rid if the player doesn't cut the mustard. With our recent record in the transfer market, perhaps that ought to be our policy of choice...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are there any actual links to Bakker? Apols if missed but I can’t find any.

 

Post #892 above ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever loan left back we get is coming in short term at least not to play much unless there's an injury to our first choice.

Kind of a hard brief. What's motivating the parent club (are we offering them the view to permanent or just waiting for them to get desperate to have the player out on loan) , so probably be quite late in the window before it gets sorted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying that we shouldn't get someone in, I'm just saying what's the point in loaning an inexperienced teenager for cover? We don't get any of the rewards for developing him and from PSG's perspective there is every chance he won't get developed as Bertrand will probably play most games, its a lose lose situation. It would make more sense for us to loan a reliable if uninspiring journeyman as cover and for PSG to send their teenager where he is guaranteed to get regular first team football.

 

From this I'd say its more likely we will get an option/obligation to buy or it will just be a permanent deal.

 

The first part of your message makes sense but the second half not so. We need to be bringing in more established players so the club/team can actually benefit plus the academy/emerging players can learn from the best but not journeymen. Sign capable players who will hit the ground running, so to speak. We did that with our last manager (Hughes) and look where that left us. We have had enough disinterested people happy to pick up a pay cheque. We need leaders. Our entire ethos as a feeder club is flawed and uninspiring. Other fans criticise this aspect of our strategy and you can’t disagree. Our ethos about developing youth has logic but what’s the point if we don’t benefit from their best years, or at least some of them. In the past, a player hit form, they were sold.

 

Look at the results of our behaviour as a club. Upper table, European contenders. Sold off all the talent. Back to the unambitious days of old. Relegation fodder whilst Liverpool look set to win the league for the first time in circa 30 years, partly down to the hard work of our previous and much more robust and competent scouting network. It would be nice to see SFC & the fans to enjoy the fruit of our labours. We briefly did enjoy relative success despite what Gary Neville once said (we aren’t a top tier, top 6 club although his short, biased memory didn’t register we finished 6th, 8th & 10th when our club was actually managed).

 

We (or Gao) need to decide what they actually want from the club. Just to make do as we always did before Markus arrived, zero ambition, uninspiring, incompetent, deceitful, divisive and self serving ownership (Askham, Lowe * spit*) or actually a club that competed and made the city proud. Of all the owners, the Liebherrs were the most successful and profitable. You get out what you put in, sometimes. You certainly won’t benefit from abject neglect.

 

Sign some defenders. Wasn't Maehle a Ralph target? I have more confidence in these type of signings but don’t understand why we appear to be sitting on our hands. I appreciate transfers are complex but come on, sort it out Saints.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Post #892 above ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Cheers Ron but that’s to Sabley (which I think is more likely) [emoji6]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})