Jump to content

San Marino 9-0 Saints - Post Match Reaction


Recommended Posts

Just now, TWar said:

 

Make your mind up mate.

My mind is made up. They’re not a better team, but tactically are set up to not take a pasting better than we are. 
 

What will your excuse for Ralph be next time it happens? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teddeer said:

Oh, it all makes sense now.  In that case feel free to keep banging on about it, fill your boots.

Should a manager who’s lost to the record score line twice and unwilling to change his style which will likely result in it happening again, be under pressure? Yes or no? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is the second thread today that SKD has derailed with pointless negative diatribe. 

Enjoy the ignore list. 

 

JWP had a very good game, Sterling was awful. We should have scored more but their keeper was excellent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SKD said:

Got us to the top of the league for 1 day and then a relegation battle and a record equalling defeat in the same season 😄

 

Most points thrown away from winning position as well, isn’t it? 

You mean he got us to top over the course of almost half the season and had one day where everything went against us?

The only way to drop points is to get into that winning position in the first place. If we keep doing that there's clearly something going right with the tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, vin said:

Nope, you read that in to my post. I said if England were as clinical as Man Utd they would have scored more. The  stats you quote back that up not disprove it.

LOL, okay let’s clutch at the straw to excuse our 9-0 losses that England weren’t as clinical against a team of postmen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SKD said:

Should a manager who’s lost to the record score line twice and unwilling to change his style which will likely result in it happening again, be under pressure? Yes or no? 

Depends on whether they were the only two games he was managing the team. If he was then the answer is obviously yes.  However, if we're talking about Ralph then you have to look at the bigger picture.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jimmy_D said:

You mean he got us to top over the course of almost half the season and had one day where everything went against us?

The only way to drop points is to get into that winning position in the first place. If we keep doing that there's clearly something going right with the tactics.

One day? We’ve won 1 premier league game in the last 12 😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SKD said:

Should a manager who’s lost to the record score line twice and unwilling to change his style which will likely result in it happening again, be under pressure? Yes or no? 

Depends on the manager, depends on other results. Should a manager who lost 7-2 to a side who just avoided relegation be under pressure when his team should be favourites for the league? No, because it's Klopp. Context is important. If a manager does well for a long time they earn some leeway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jimmy_D said:

You mean he got us to top over the course of almost half the season and had one day where everything went against us?

The only way to drop points is to get into that winning position in the first place. If we keep doing that there's clearly something going right with the tactics.

How do you work that out? Surely if we keep failing to win when winning it means there is something wrong with the tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does it seem like more than fifty percent of posts on this forum these days are by one of about 4 posters, all of whom insist in taking the topics off course? Please do us a favour and go and argue with yourselves in the mirror.

Anyway.. delighted for JWP tonight. Well taken goal and a decent performance. Got a lot of talent in that England midfield though so I do fear for him missing out on a place in the squad in the summer. Play your socks off til ' the end of the season though Prowsey and you'll be in with a shout. 

Edited by Saint_Jonny
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teddeer said:

Depends on whether they were the only two games he was managing the team. If he was then the answer is obviously yes.  However, if we're talking about Ralph then you have to look at the bigger picture.

What is the bigger picture exactly? Most leads thrown away from winning positions?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TWar said:

Depends on the manager, depends on other results. Should a manager who lost 7-2 to a side who just avoided relegation be under pressure when his team should be favourites for the league? No, because it's Klopp. Context is important. If a manager does well for a long time they earn some leeway.

That’ll be the Klopp who has won the premier league, champions league and world club cup in the last 3 years. Yeah great comparison :lol:

Edited by Turkish
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TWar said:

Depends on the manager, depends on other results. Should a manager who lost 7-2 to a side who just avoided relegation be under pressure when his team should be favourites for the league? No, because it's Klopp. Context is important. If a manager does well for a long time they earn some leeway.

If big Sam (it’d never happen under him, as he knows how to organise a defence), lost 9-0 twice and had same results as Ralph, would you call for his head? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Turkish said:

How do you work that out? Surely if we keep failing to win when winning it means there is something wrong with the tactics.

I suppose we'd be better off being like Sheffield United and never getting into the winning positions in the first place?

We've had a poor run, but it's getting into winning positions that gives us a chance to, well, actually win them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Saint_Jonny said:

Is it just me or does it seem like more than fifty percent of posts on this forum these days are by one of about 4 posters, all of whom insist in taking the topics off course? Please do us a favour and go and argue with yourselves in the mirror.

Anyway.. delighted for JWP tonight. Well taken goal and a decent performance. Got a lot of talent in that England midfield though so I do fear for him missing out on a place in the squad in the summer. Play your socks off til ' the end of the season though Prowsey and you'll be in with a shout. 

Well said.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Saint_Jonny said:

Is it just me or does it seem like more than fifty percent of posts on this forum these days are by one of about 4 posters, all of whom insist in taking the topics off course? Please do us a favour and go and argue with yourselves in the mirror.

Anyway.. delighted for JWP tonight. Well taken goal and a decent performance. Got a lot of talent in that England midfield though so I do fear for him missing out on a place in the squad in the summer. Play your socks off til ' the end of the season though Prowsey and you'll be in with a shout. 

Yep, Prowse did well. Great save to deny him a second. Personally I think he’s nailed on to go to the euros.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jimmy_D said:

I suppose we'd be better off being like Sheffield United and never getting into the winning positions in the first place?

We've had a poor run, but it's getting into winning positions that gives us a chance to, well, actually win them.

Ridiculous argument. The giving away winning positions has been a problem for a long time, that suggests there is a problem with game management, team mentality and tactics when we get on front. Or we could just carry on burying our head in the sand with the pathetic losers arguement you’ve put forward that we should jut never go ahead in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SKD said:

What is the bigger picture exactly? Most leads thrown away from winning positions?

I can't be arsed to explain what the bigger picture is to you. Speaks volumes that you can only think of most leads thrown away  from winning positions. Go and do some research.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Turkish said:

Ridiculous argument. The giving away winning positions has been a problem for a long time, that suggests there is a problem with game management, team mentality and tactics when we get on front. Or we could just carry on burying our head in the sand with the pathetic losers arguement you’ve put forward that we should jut never go ahead in the first place.

Where did I say we shouldn't go ahead in the first place?

I just pointed out that having an ability to go ahead in games isn't a given in the Premier League. We've been better than most at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Lighthouse changed the title to San Marino 9-0 Saints - Post Match Reaction
10 minutes ago, igsey said:

So this is the second thread today that SKD has derailed with pointless negative diatribe. 

Enjoy the ignore list. 

 

JWP had a very good game, Sterling was awful. We should have scored more but their keeper was excellent. 

Thanks to this comment I have just found out about the existence of the ignore list. This should make viewing the forum infinitely more enjoyable. Shame the mods can't just ban people who make every thread about the 9-0 loss or how much they hate Ralph.

Edited by TWar
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TWar said:

Thanks to this comment I have just found out about the existence of the ignore list. This should make viewing the forum infinitely more enjoyable.

Hahaha get your tissues out because someone dares to challenge the narrative and point out the failings of the supreme leader. 
 

I say supreme leader ironically, but Christ this place is worse than North Korea. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Turkish said:

Maybe we should put forward some great tactical ideas like playing Redmond in center of midfield 

That old chestnut. I never named Redmond I merely suggested that we have other midfielders who could adapt and do a job at the time Romeu and Diallo were both injured. I think Armstrong proved my point rather well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jimmy_D said:

I suppose we'd be better off being like Sheffield United and never getting into the winning positions in the first place?

 

2 minutes ago, Jimmy_D said:

Where did I say we shouldn't go ahead in the first place?

I just pointed out that having an ability to go ahead in games isn't a given in the Premier League. We've been better than most at it.

Here. We may get into winning positions but more often than not we blow it, why is it an issue to say it’s a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, SKD said:

If big Sam (it’d never happen under him, as he knows how to organise a defence), lost 9-0 twice and had same results as Ralph, would you call for his head? 

Interesting that @TWardidnt answer this one. I suspect it’s because I already know the answer. Ralph = hipsters choice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TWar said:

Thanks to this comment I have just found out about the existence of the ignore list. This should make viewing the forum infinitely more enjoyable. Shame the mods can't just ban people who make every thread about the 9-0 loss or how much they hate Ralph.

Shame they won’t ban people who incorrectly accuse others of racism yet won’t apologise even When other point out they’re wrong 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Teddeer said:

That old chestnut. I never named Redmond I merely suggested that we have other midfielders who could adapt and do a job at the time Romeu and Diallo were both injured. I think Armstrong proved my point rather well.

Armstrong is a completely different type of player to Redmond. Glad you’re still so ashamed of it you’re denying you said it though, so would I be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Teddeer said:

That old chestnut. I never named Redmond I merely suggested that we have other midfielders who could adapt and do a job at the time Romeu and Diallo were both injured. I think Armstrong proved my point rather well.

Armstrong, whilst naturally being a more attacking player, has played CM before. 
 

Redmond is just a ridiculous suggestion and  would never succeed at any professional level in CM 😂😂😂😂

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Shame they won’t ban people who incorrectly accuse others of racism yet won’t apologise even When other point out they’re wrong 

Or ban previously banned users, with new user names (cough chapel end) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TWar said:

Thanks to this comment I have just found out about the existence of the ignore list. This should make viewing the forum infinitely more enjoyable. Shame the mods can't just ban people who make every thread about the 9-0 loss or how much they hate Ralph.

 

This is already paying off! 😂😂

image.thumb.png.a371686373d7b0a3471a1bcf3edfe353.png

Edited by TWar
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Turkish said:

Pretty weird to start a new thread with this title when that wasn’t even the point of the other comments. Still don’t dare to post against the narrative. 

People actually calling for others to be banned because they are calling out the worse defeat of our history 😭

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TWar said:

image.thumb.png.2d6f7bb366c8fefb47359e51b8698779.png

This is already paying off! 😂😂

image.png

Today has been a disaster for you. False accusations of racism, plenty pointing out that you were wrong and refusal to accept it, then spectacularly failing to understand basic football tactics, finished up with the classic boasting about putting people on ignore. Congratulations on one the most tragic performances since saints losing 9-0 twice.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SKD said:

People actually calling for others to be banned because they are calling out the worse defeat of our history 😭

People posting screenshots of who they’ve got on ignore because they’ve repeatedly been made to look silly 😂😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s hope the supreme leader asked Prowsey to gets some tip from the San Marino gaffer on how to set up a defence. 
 

We don’t want to add the first team to lose 9-0 at Wembley to the list of Ralph’s many achievements. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Armstrong is a completely different type of player to Redmond. Glad you’re still so ashamed of it you’re denying you said it though, so would I be.

You're ashamed of the fact you can't pull up the thread where I suggested Redmond should play centre midfield. The reason you can't is that you made it up.

Edited by Teddeer
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teddeer said:

You're ashamed of the fact you can't pull up the thread where I suggested Redmond should play centre midfield. Thde reason you can't is that you made it up.

Deny Khloe Kardashian GIF by Bunim/Murray Productions

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Teddeer said:

You're ashamed of the fact you can't pull up the thread where I suggested Redmond should play centre midfield. The reason you can't is that you made it up.

Don’t try and deflect it, you did suggest that. It was something along the lines of ‘all professional footballers should be able to play any position’

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SKD said:

Don’t try and deflect it, you did suggest that. It was something along the lines of ‘all professional footballers should be able to play any position’

Yep, all professional should be able to run and tackle, then listed several players, including Redmond would could play centre midfield, proper embarrassing 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SKD said:

Don’t try and deflect it, you did suggest that. It was something along the lines of ‘all professional footballers should be able to play any position’

 

1 minute ago, SKD said:

Don’t try and deflect it, you did suggest that. It was something along the lines of ‘all professional footballers should be able to play any position’

You're clutching at straws just to back up your other mate in the 9-0 club. You gave yourself away when you said 'along the lines of'

Edited by Teddeer
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TWar said:

Looked OK I thought, didn't get much service. Armstrong looks like a totally different player for Scotland, looked well off it, although I did only tune in for the second half.

I’ve cancelled you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Teddeer said:

 

You're clutching at straws just o back up your other mate in the 9-0 club. You gave yourself away when you said 'along the lines of'

Because I can’t remember word for word, but I remember the suggestion because it was so ridiculous. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Teddeer said:

You're ashamed of the fact you can't pull up the thread where I suggested Redmond should play centre midfield. The reason you can't is that you made it up.

deny the office GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SKD said:

Because I can’t remember word for word, but I remember the suggestion because it was so ridiculous. 

You forgot to mention that we've lost 9-0 twice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})