dvaughanwilliams

JWP justifying his starting place with another good delivery.

Yesssssssssssssss! Rodriguez

I think that if we keep things tight until half time, we've got a great chance in the second half. Stoke have tended to fall apart in the second half, we've got much better stamina and we'll have the wind in our favour. Long way to go in this game.

I'm trying not to be pleased that Begovic is in my fantasy football team. Now when we put a load past him, I might still score a couple of points.

I'm a bit surprised about JWP keeping his place. I thought that Stoke's defence would be able to deal with his style of deliveries and that Steven Davis would suit playing more passes along the ground. Also thought that his experience would be a benefit against such a physical team. Obviously JWP has been rewarded for some excellent recent performances by keeping his starting place.

My take on it would be that the current manager is not using one of our highest paid (and highest valued) players against the best sides, when clearly our best players are needed to step up their games. And lets not forget that Ramirez is a player that MP didn't sign himself. Our top players really should be getting games in "a game like this"; that he wasn't used at all today says one thing; that he hasn't been used from the start even against the lower ranked sides is more cause for question. It's no use for a club like us to have such a valuable asset sat on the bench. And if MP feels that he could use that sort of spend to much better effect I have little doubt that he'll be pressing the club to act.

 

Don't get me wrong, I think having Ramirez from the bench is a great option. Its just whether that option is as good as reinvesting the money in another player who MP will use a lot more. A bit of a simplistic comparison, but if Gaston's wage rumours are anywhere near accurate I'd suggest we shouldn't be spending that on someone who doesn't make the first team so often.

I agree that Gaston should be getting picked for games like this, but I don't think that it warrants selling him. His presence on the bench is pushing the players on the pitch to play to their best because they know that they stand to lose their place to him if they don't.

He is being kept out of the team by Osvaldo (upto £15m), Rodriguez (£6-7m) and Lallana. All three of them are, arguably, of comparable value to Ramirez. Having him on the bench shows the strength in depth we have as when one of them inevitably has a dip in form or gets injured, hopefully the time on the bench spurs him on to make an impact on the team to hold down his place.

However, I would say that I completely misread the situation regarding Forren and Mayuka so he's probably being lined up for a loan to a Championship club.

They drew against the team who are favourites for relegation.

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/league-2/relegation

Hardly grounds for optimism.

Don't disagree with that, but an Astori (assuming he is as good as everyone says he is) costs more than a Yoshida for a reason.

Price is determined by many more factors than the ability of a player. Did Samba cost more than the rumoured cost of Astori for a reason?

I think that the transfers in the summer this year will have a similar spread of cost to last summer. One 'marquee' signing who commands a fee of 1/3-1/2 our total spending, Ramirez last year. With several other signing in the range of £1m-£7m.

I expect most of the players that we sign will be under 25 and bought because they have been identified as having potential with technical ability and are comfortable in possession. It wouldn't surprise me if half of the players brought in didn't make much impact in their first season with an intention of buying them when young, developing them in house and resulting in a player with a much higher value. This is a strategy that has a higher level of risk involved, but the lower transfer cost offsets some of this risk. It also seems to annoy a lot of people on this forum, judging by the comments about Mayuka and Forren.

It wouldn't surprise me if there was someone on the scouting staff who fancies themselves as the next Nate Silver doing Bayesian analysis from scouting reports to identify underpriced players. Several of our recent transfers have a smell of 'Moneyball' about them.

I'm relieved it didn't go down to the last day, I've always hated those last day survival games.

Staying in the league counts as a successful season for me. There were times when it looked like we could/should have been more comfortable, but staying up was always the priority.

Confirmed safe now right?

Barring a 15-0 loss to Stoke.

Sick of Adam Blackmore suggesting that we're still in danger. Screaming at radio.

Not if Wigan win by a couple of very high margins.

That would relegate Villa.

Gaston's a frustrating player because you can see that he has talent but often makes poor decisions. He tries outrageous flicks and backheels that look fantastic when they work and make him look like an idiot when they don't.

I'm also not sure which position in the team's usual 4-2-3-1 formation he should play in. Whilst he plays on the wing for Uruguay, he's never really looked convincing playing there in a Saints shirt. He's had his best performances in a relatively free role just behind Lambert, but I think that J-Rod has been more effective in this role than Gaston. I think that the form of both Lambert and Rodriguez has been a bit of a surprise and they have both adapted to the Premier League better than expected and Ramirez worse. Building a team isn't an exact science and there is always an element of uncertainty about how a player will fit in to a team and whether they will be able to recreate the form that they have had at a previous team.

If he wants to leave and we get a decent offer, then we should let him go. If he doesn't want to go then I don't think that we should be soliciting bids for him. If he can get a settled position in the formation and a lot of practice fitting in to the team in pre-season then he might perform a lot better next season.

Not sure if this has been posted but a nice tactical view of our last game, could be some interesting learnings for Sunday.

 

http://www.eplindex.com/31750/tottenham-1-southampton-0-indepth-tactical-analysis.html

A very interesting read and gives an insight into the tactical preparation that must go on behind the scenes.

I haven't really paid much attention to Sunderland's performances, but I expect we'll look to take advantage of Johnson's lack of tracking back. Also, after Di Canio's statements it wouldn't surprise me if Sunderland were a little bit too pumped up for the match and gave away a lot of fouls. Playing a lot of short, fast passes making the Sunderland midfield chase the ball, getting them frustrated might lead to winning a lot of free kicks.

I think that Sessegnon being injured is the biggest thing in our favour, he seems to create a lot of chances and link the forwards and midfield. Not sure who they'll get to do this job with him out. The only other alternative is to go for long balls direct to Graham or Wickham and hope that the wingers can pick up the flick ons.

We've moved to a more flexible formation with players given the freedom to move around. When we didn't have the ball Rodriguez was on the left wing with Lambert waiting on the half way line. When Boruc was taking a goal kick or a free kick from an offside Lambert would go to the wing to take advantage of Bertrand or Azpilicueta's lack of experience and J-Rod would take a position in the middle in front of the centre backs.

Lambert wouldn't have won as many headers against Ivanovic and Terry, but both got exposed by Rodriguez's pace. Clearly a lesson learned from the QPR game where Samba won every header with Lambert staying in the centre.

The understanding that has grown between Lambert and Rodriguez and presumably the trust that the manager has in them to take up the right positions benefits them both.

And ESPN! WTF?

BBC also showing Fox playing instead of Cork.

http://www.communitypompey.co.uk/files/PST-Prospectus.pdf

The PST are still publishing the prospectus showing a property developer and the old business plan. I know that they're using the loophole of "community shares" that have lower standards than a normal share issue, but is this legal? Surely they're canvassing for investments on false information.

The financial projections on page 8 (page 5 of the pdf) look even funnier now.

Also:

Full details of the financial projections can be found on the trust website

Can't seem to find those pesky details.

That, in a nutshell, sums up the trust and pompey in general.

 

The strings attached made it impractical (i.e. the PL would never agree or even discuss parachute payments being paid direct to the council which is one of the terms of the loan). Nothing has changed amongst those strings - they are still attached.

 

But no, the pst decide to have a different view. The whole world will be rosier because they'll get relegated to a lower league (I can hear the cries of 'we'll walk this league' in the pst meetings now!) and magically they'll get even better gates because they're the bestest after all. Let's just totally ignore that they'll be a struggling L2 side.

 

Never let the facts get in the way though....

But, they'll get more sponsorship and sell more hospitality purely due to being a 'community club'. Also, because they'll run the club so well, it will generate an operating profit to pay back the loan to the council, meet the football debt and pay the new CVA.

I don't think that it's too much of a problem. As others have said, yellow cards are an occupational hazard for a defensive midfielder.

It would only be a problem if he was picking up red cards for either two yellows or lashing out at opposing players and getting a straight red, as he did in previous seasons. It shows that he is relatively sensible with his fouling and doesn't take risks when he's on a yellow.

Just saw this

http://www.pompeytrust.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=507%3Aticket-prices&catid=34%3Ademo-category

 

They ask the question "How do we fill the ‘Park’?"

 

Surely you don't need to ask the bestest that as they will fill the park no matter the cost. Surely they meant how to make the park bigger so to fit everyone in?

This encapsulates everything about the trust: a whiff of desperation and a glimpse into their hole filled business plan filled with optimism.

Much as I might agree with your sentiment, the fact is that at least three teams HAVE been in Admin 2 seasons running, and each has had extra large points deductions imposed on it by the Football League:

 

Luton Town 2007-08, still in Admin at start of 2008-09 - 10 points for first admin, plus another 20 for second admin combined with financial irregularities.

 

Bournemouth were originally deducted 10 pts for the 2007–08 season. Having failed to exit administration or to agree to a CVA before the start of the 2008–09 season, they started that season with −17 points.

 

Rotherham were originally deducted 10 pts for the 2007–08 season. Having failed to exit administration or to agree to a CVA before the start of the 2008–09 season, they started that season with −17 points.

 

All available to peruse here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administration_%28British_football%29

They went into admin last season. This is their second season in admin. Next season would be their third.

I'm being realistic.

 

Back when Alan Nixon first broke the RdM replacing Adkins story, I spoke with him on Twitter about why it was happening. He spoke then of a rift between Chairman and Manager, over transfer policy, and that the key point of difference was the level of ambition in the transfers. I made the point back then that Cortese probably wanted the big names but didn't trust Adkins to manage them, and that Adkins would be more comfortable with low-key signings than international superstars. The Mirror article bears this out somewhat.

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tensions-over-transfers-saw-nigel-1546179

 

So whatever ride we've experienced as fans, the situation at SMS between chairman and manager has been broken for a long time. Left to continue it'll result in factions. It's not fair to players to have to divide their loyalties like kids in a messy divorce. Long term, that situation just isn't tenable and even though the vast majority of people on here have had their fingers in their ears whenever bad news rolls in with the tide, the reality is that the club has been rumbling along with this internal strife since last season.

 

A bit of conflict can be very useful in arriving at a good decision, but too much can become corrosive. I think NA getting sacked by TV was appalling, but again, being realistic - he has exited the club with his head held high and already has suitors.

 

Bottom line; most organisations cannot function if the link between the executives and the management is broken.

You make very sensible and pragmatic points, however, I think that this situation has been handled so badly that it has alienated the fans. Whilst I fully accept that I am just a customer of a ruthless business, it isn't nice to have that fact rubbed in your face. By acting in a way that is in direct contradiction of the fans' wishes, as voiced by support for Adkins at games, it puts an extra distance between the fans and the club. It hasn't annoyed me enough to stop me going to games, but it will effect some people's decisions who go on an occasional basis. It has affected the way I feel about the club and I might be a bit quieter in my support at games.

At clubs that have explicit bankrolling from billionaires, this can be ignored. I'm not convinced that we're in that position. If the club has to be self-funding, treating the fans badly and poor communication is a bad strategy.

Nigel wasn't just a really good football manager, he was also a really great person. I never met him, but I've heard loads of stories from other people who just ran into him in WestQuay or around town and he always made time to talk to them. Whenever he was asked by the press about rumours that the chairman was plotting behind his back, he would deflect the story, defend the chairman and then praise the club. When a player had made a mistake in a game, he would acknowledge the mistake and then praise all of the good things that the player had done.

He was always positive, never looked for excuses and never looked to criticise. For someone with many admirable characteristics being treated so poorly feels so unjustified.

I'm undecided on the subject. I think that if the team are playing badly or losing, then there will be chants for Nigel and against Cortese which will foster a bad atmosphere in the stadium. In the unlikely event that we start giving Everton a thumping, all thoughts of a protest will be long forgotten.

I certainly won't boo the new manager, but I probably won't cheer or applaud his announcement. I'm not planning to join in with chants for NA, either.