Jump to content

Faz

Members
  • Posts

    2,852
  • Joined

Posts posted by Faz

  1. Worst player to represent us since we came back up. Beyond awful. If loaning him out just to shift a percentage of his wages is the best we can do we should do it.

     

    I’ll see your Moi, and raise you a Danny Fox

  2. If other clubs are interested, as rumoured, and we go in with a mickey mouse offer we stand to lose the player. Business deals don't get over the line by insulting the other party, especially if someone else is prepared be more realistic. By all means chance your arm with an offer, but you can't take the p1ss.

     

    Just suppose the player and his Agent have decided he is coming to Saints in preference to other interested parties - would that not strengthen our hand in negotiations? Not tha we would tap anyone up, of course.

  3. Oh well, more cost cutting it seems, wonder where Mitchell will rock up. I think we could be in for a similar situation we had with Les Reed when Koeman was here - an engaged football manager directly advising on player purchases and a limited DoF building a reputation on the back of it. Let's hope so, it's the best outcome.

     

    Conjecture and a re-writing of history. Love it

  4. Well thats a damming indictment of our transfer policy and planning when you go from missing out on a diminutive speedster so opt for a cart horse instead. And to think the person responsible is now our DoF.

     

    It’s also bollicks.

  5. If this is the case, why did the club not say so? Why was the dodgy website put together? Are we sure that this is a method of bringing funds into the club, rather than the creation of an entity that would allow funds to exit the club?

     

    Not you as well. How would this reverse sponsorship deal work? FFS GAO owns 80% of the club, he could just charge a management fee to the club and take money out that way. I’m not saying LD Sports is or isn’t legit, but some of the nonsense on here is, well, nonsense.

  6. It would show in the accounts eventually, yeah. So what? Doesn't mean it can't happen. It's happened to other clubs in the past.

     

    If there is a complete absence of communication from the owners then of course people will speculate. The club should see that there is plenty of negative speculation and do something about it.

     

    The fact that there continues to be zero communication is itself indicative of a problem, IMO.

     

    Sorry, which clubs have paid money out to their shirt sponsors?

  7. Considering the amount we have to pay when we sack them, this is kind of understandable.

     

    How much do we have to pay?? Genuine question. There seems to be a perceived wisdom that we have to pay up the remaining term of their contract, whereas I doubt that is ever the case. Reason one is both Puel and MoP found jobs quite quickly. Second reason is none of us know what compensation is written in to the contract - it might me a set amount or one year's money.

     

    Happy to corrected by thosewho know better.

  8. Really don't have much confidence in the club appointing the right guy, given the CV's of the people on the board..

     

    I want so much to be proved wrong, please can we get it right this time...

     

    Do you think your CV would stand in the way of you appointing the right guy?

  9. Whilst it is unlikely that Reed told Hughes not to play someone, it is entirely feasible that he told Hughes that a player had to start in order to maintain his value. I'll let you work out who.

     

     

    PS I have absolutely no evidence for this assertion.

×
×
  • Create New...