pedg

Nor mine expressing concern at his track record ......

Strangely my question about if he knows of even one successful company that Cala has been involved with has not got through...

There is another group

Does this other group by anychance consist of Santa, the tooth fairy, the yeti and a random assembly of fairies?

Other than Chanrai, who are CSI's other creditors? You know, the ones on whose behalf AA is working to maximise their return. Just like he did for all the PFC creditors.

Well CSI owe the people they bought North One Sport from £3M

Finally turned up today. Box contains only the iPod, no cables, no headphones.

Anyway I now have a new silver 8GB new Nano so can't complain.

Anyone else convinced that this "leak" is a decoy to buy more time with the FL (who just happen to have a meeting today to discuss the Pompey situation)?

Expect we will get a statement soon after the FL meeting finishes from AA disclaiming Cala's involvement.

Yet another organisation that doesn't read the SWF.... :-)

If I was any of these organisations that had paid for due diligence investigations I would be looking if there was actually information in the public domain (rumafia?) that means CSI should not have passed due diligence. I suspect the companies paid to do the investigations are a bit nervous right now.

A few years old, part 2 here

 

http://www.stockpatrol.com/article/key/cala2

So that report was published in September 2000 so I assume all of the projects listed are now up and running? or maybe not.

wondered if he twigged that he has having the **** ripped out of his webchat.

I suspect he might as any semblance of quality control on what went through appeared to have gone at the end as if he has just given up trying.

Despite UPS claiming it has been out for delivery since 7.15 this morning no sign of the replacement iPod. Which is a bit of a pain having had to be in all day waiting.

No sign of life on the webchat yet.... http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/pompey/webchats

Probably waiting for a non-loaded question

Even though it was nearly 40 years ago?

Actually that was from the prem FAPPT there is not an equivalent in the FL from what I can see so he look fine to me. Sign him up pompey, what could go wrong?

I'd put money on him flying through it. I think GM posted a good account for what the FAPPT would probably be like a few pages back. Anyway, the longer the FL hide behind a FAPPT that doesnt work the more laughs we get on here as shadey chancer number 59703 rolls in on the back of AA's waves.

 

Long may it continue. lol

The FAPPT includes excluding anyone convicted of counterfeiting and covers like offences from outside the UK.

He is convicted on indictment of an offence set out in the Appendix 12 Schedule of Offences or he is convicted of a like offence by a competent court having jurisdiction outside England and Wales

 

...

Using a copy of a false instrument: Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, section 4

....

Convicted of $160,000 counterfit notes

I very much suspect that if that is the case then he might actually fail the FAPPT

Ripped off from twitter

Anthony Worrall Thompson stole some cheese and wine. And that was only for starters

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/po...ikou_1_3405192

 

Andrew Andronikou: "‘We need to have the new buyers in as soon as possible to take the club forward."

 

Erm...can someone explain what this has to do with the administration of the company called "CSI"?

 

In other words, why is there a need for Pompey to have "new buyers as soon as possible" when there is no fiscal connection whatsoever between Portsmouth Football Club 2010 and CSI?

 

Someone help me out here.

 

Confused.com

My guess would be that if they don't get a buyer soon then they will definitely get a points penalty and the chances of getting a buyer will then go down, possibly to zero depending on the size of the penalty. With NOS going pop it looks like selling pompey is the only way for Chainrai to get any money hence him keeping them on life support once CSI went into admin.

Or "The Portapin Adventure" where a group of overpaid footballers have to escape a football club that has capsized and is slowly sinking.

Inspired by the potential new owners of Pompey, Hollywood have commissioned a re-make of one of their classic films. It's going to be called "20 Leagues Under Chelsea"

 

Form an orderly queue - I'm here all week.

I prefer "Voyage to the bottom of the Blue Square Premier South"

So the main change is that now it will be a fish petting zoo?

Just had confirmation mine has been processed and checking the serial number they quote for the new one I am getting a new gen 6 nano.

According to tracking it should arrive today so will confirm model and capacity once it arrives.

Hopefully, if we can get Thierry Henry's script writer on board, the 50,000 post will be Fitzhugh Fella posting "The End"

I'm getting confused. Well, more confused than normal. Can someone do one of those animated Lego videos to explain events thus far? Cheers

how about this one. Quite appropriate I thought

[video=youtube;w-OUoxxWk1k]

According to the articles it was around March/April 2010 that they were advanced parachute money.

 

So this should be shown in the CVA report of 28th May 2010. Can anyone find it?

 

What is clear is that the amount being diverted to football creditors is £22.4m, leaving at most £25.6m for "other".

Question is when were they advanced the parachute payment?

The 22.4 million is I assume football creditors at the point they went into admin?

If some of the first parachute payment was released before admin to go towards football creditors then part of their parachute pot would have been spent before admin so the total for football creditors to take out of the parachute payments could be greater than the 22.4? don't know.

Although, having said that, if they were advanced Year 1 payments, is it reasonable to assume that subsequent payments have also been/are scheduled to be paid early? Or are we to believe that they received no parachute payments during 10/11? Perhaps my original post was (inadvertently) correct after all?

2009-2010 Still in prem but reports of being paid first years parachute payments. 1st 16 million

2010-2011 2nd 16 million

2011-2012 1st 8 million, assume paid in instalments so have about 4 million to come.

2012-2013 8 million

By my back of an envelope calculations they probably have about 12 million to come assuming full advance of 16 million in the 2009-2010 season.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/fa-cup/8998367/Chelsea-v-Portsmouth-FA-Cup-rematch-a-chance-for-Pompey-chimes-to-ring-again.html

 

Ooh how did we miss this article 4 days ago

 

thx to one of my tweeter stalkers for posting the link

 

WARNING it contains a small interview with & picture of TCWTB

 

BUT it also puts into print about broken pledges etc

I don't think this quote is correct is it?

The Premier League's parachute payments have been going directly to football creditors but Portsmouth will also directly receive £28 million from that pot before the end of the 2013-14 season.