Barry Sanchez

Whats this.

Your post 56.

Bearsy In short the younger generation solely think that trophies are what constitute a big club, a shiny new stadiums helps, there are timeouts though from when you are a successful club though and a large one, ask one of the above as they seem to make the rules up as they go along. First of all I stated Spurs were possibly the largest side in London and was given they have not won enough trophies, when I pointed out how they were pioneers, this was thrown out again as it was years ago, I have sonce pointed out they have won a trophy more recently than Arsenal, this too was thrown out as having been to modern, so modern in fact its a cutting edge futuristic trophy that even they dont know about yet..................

Other churches and denominations I have lots of time for, I should be a Catholic but the arrogance of a priest and the church acting as a conduit between someones faith and God is ridiculous. The absolution of sins I have an issue with. The sanctity of the confession. The last rites. Use of condoms and safe sex. And many many many others.

Keeping millions of people enslaved to a book, once they wise up move on to some other more gullible Countries..................

To your argument no history of the club has an impact? Or should the list of the largest club in London read 1) Chelsea 2) Spurs 3) Arsenal HA HA sweet.

Equally false and shallow and also part of the argument a big ground to you constitutes a big club, equally laughable.

Handy that cheers, a 10 month old thread, nice one you must be bored.

Bearsy, these kids look at a shiny stadium and go well they must be massive ha ha, they dont have a clue of the history of the game.

Er no.

Few clubs were selling out in the mid 90's Didn't Spurs win a European trophy in 1984 and in 1972............................. I cant possibly comment on what Spurs are planning to do with a stadium, maybe they dont have enough space?

Who said football started in 1992? the caveat that seemed to be created when I mentioned teams from history that had a successful past. Spurs could sell out a 60,000 stadium or damn near it, Arsenal's lack of atmosphere may be something to do with their new found fans? They are after Chelsea the most middle class of the London teams, but too be honest Highbury was awful for atmospehere as well. North london is only part of London.

Need a divers watch for about £200-£250 what one? http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seiko-Stainless-Resistant-Bracelet-SKA369P1/dp/B002MFATUC/ref=sr_1_28?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1363273271&sr=1-28 or http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seiko-Stainless-Resistant-Bracelet-SKA369P1/dp/B002MFATUC/ref=sr_1_28?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1363273271&sr=1-28 or http://www.amazon.co.uk/Citizen-CA0265-59E-Eco-Drive-Titanium-Watch/dp/B005MKGPC0/ref=pd_cp_watches_3

I think you can gamble on a future by being too conservative, maybe I am wrong....................

I think I said possibly, the size of the club is as we have discussed not done on success and success alone, or would you like another discussion on it? I stated that there are more fans in Enlgand and London that support Spurs than Arsenal (this may stem for the Nicholson era? Now I understand its subjective but we have discussed that, I have not closed any options on this, football did not start in 1992 as I have already said.

Ha ha.

If you recall this came about as someone scoffed at the purchasing of Manchester City and I stated they had pedigree and history, the same of Spurs, also people were arguing Spurs were smaller than Arsenal and Chelsea simply because they have not won anything recently (more recently than Arsenal but hey why let the facts can in the way of your own argument) and when I pointed out about us and them down the road the caveat came in about time and I mentioned Swansea etc etc, its all there are highly amusing.

Well for a poor thread it got quite a few replies, always tickles me that people reply yet moan about the quality of thread.

No I believe I said that and now you are jumping on that bandwagon ha ha!

So you concede the point, your argument basing size solely on success is flawed?

No the European Cup not a European Cup, Celtic are a huge World club Christ alive................

Where did I say that? I said it plays a part. Answer the question, I am laughing out loud here as I have read through page 2 and the contradictions are very funny. Spurs 3rd biggest in London as they have not won as much as Chelsea and Arsenal recently. Southampton bigger than pom*ey as we have won err hold on a minute As a last belter, if Spurs win the European Cup are they bigger than Arsenal as they have not won anything for the last 8 years? Does this change over happen straight away? They could hand over the 2nd placed baton on the bus parade ha ha! Classic.

Are Swansea bigger than us?

But they are huge as they have won things, well this according to peoples arguments? As the caveat for this when does the time run out and they become small again ha ha?

Yes yes you are and its quite amusing seeing you changing your argument to try and win an argument you cant on the success/size of clubs and you imediately snooker yourself and have done on the lack of ours as a club.