dune

I'm not telling you it's failed per se, but i'm saying that communities have stuck together and formed their own areas in many towns and cities. It's also true of many areas that white people have moved to the suburbs and reformed their comunities and don't want to have migrtants moving into them. I give you Barking as an example.

There's a white estate in leicester (the real name escapes me) that the locals call the Alamo. It's a white area and Asians don't dare move there because they know they'll be attacked. Also there has been long running tensions between the black comunities youths and the Asian comunities youths. You may think it's a cohesive comunity and compared to places with less work like Oldham and Bradford it is more cohesive, but scrath below the surafce and you will see all is not as it might seem. Also look to the rise of the BNP in the NW suberbs (where the whites have moved) and you'll see that all is not hunky dory.

And proves that intergration - the base of a society - has failed when it comes to a multicultural society.

What is clear is that you are incapable of discussing the issue of our multicultural society like an adult.

The big difference is how it's spun by the politically correct brigade. Saying that multiculturalism is a failed experiment isn't a racist view for example. It's a view based on the fact that in towns and cities up and down the country we have seen apartheid by choice with comunities choosing not to integrate with each other. Look at places like London and you see predominently muslim areas, you see predominently afro caribean areas, you see predominently white areas. Also look to places like Luton where you see support for the EDL at it's strongest, and Islamist extremism capabl of carrying out attrocities like 7/7. So is it racist to have the opinion that multiculturalism has failed?

I'm very proud of my patriotic views.

What's the figure for 2010 and what will the figure be in 2020?

It's the poltically correct left wing that have rebranded patriotism into a nasty thing you be should be ashamed of. They call patriotism racism, when most British patriots are not racist, they just don't want to see the country swamped with immigrants.

The BNP and it's supporters aren't fascists or racists, we're patriots.

Based on the fact Brown has a smiley staged persona on TV, but behind closed doors he's a control freak and a bully, it's clear that what you see is not what you get with Gordon. I'm sure him and Mandelson are birds of a feather which probably explains why they don't like each other.

It's a good answer but it's not right.

I was just going to say this. It's typical of that vile creature.

To be fair you're both talking ******** and yet again i'm the only one talking sense.

As if Scottish Labour would do such a U-turn on a fundamental Scottish Labour point of principle. It'd destroy Labour in Scotland because there would be a mutiny.

Mmmm, not sure about that because in Scotland the SNP versus Labour is like Labour vesrus the Tories in England. Personally i can't see the SNP joining a coalition.

You stated... So evidently they say the things you agree with, but you don't like them as a party. So to vote for them would be a statement that they represent policies you agree with.

You talk as if we're out of the woods when the reality is that Gordons debt mountain could well see us go down the same road as Greece, and we don't yet know where that road will end for them.

They'll never win a seat so it does make sense to vote BNP because this is the best way of making a statement to the larger parties. I will vote BNP for this reason.

The British National Party is this nation’s only true Green party which has policies that will actually save the environment. Unlike the fake “Greens” who are merely a front for the far left of the Labour regime, the BNP is the only party to recognise that overpopulation – whose primary driver is immigration, as revealed by the government’s own figures – is the cause of the destruction of our environment. Furthermore, the BNP’s manifesto states that a BNP government will make it a priority to stop building on green land. New housing should wherever possible be built on derelict “brown land.” Other environmentally friendly policies which the BNP has in its manifesto include: - The removal of unsightly overhead power lines from beauty spots and their burial underground; - The creation of a bulk transport tax regime that pushes supermarkets to supply more local and seasonal produce; - The encouragement of an extensive and rapid switchover to organic and low fossil fuel farming techniques; - The banning of the ritual slaughter of animals without pre-stunning, and the sale of such meat; - The elimination of the unhealthy, energy intensive and cruel factory farming of livestock; - The abolition of all “stealth taxes” and other charges on household rubbish collections. Britain is one of the most densely populated countries in the world and our population is increasing — due entirely to immigration — which necessitates the building of ever more homes, which in turn places a strain on our infrastructure such as transport and water supplies. Independent environmental organisations believe that Britain’s population needs to be significantly reduced. Our immigration policies will achieve this. Together with independent environmental organisations the BNP recognises that Britain’s environmentally sustainable carrying capacity is substantially lower than its present population. With regard to the transport problem and the environmental impact it has, BNP policy is also refreshingly different. A BNP government will: - Develop alternative transport fuels such as bio-diesel and hydrogen; - Develop renewable energy sources such as off-shore wind farms, wave, tidal and solar energy; - Investigate the feasibility of cutting-edge, intrinsically-safe, fast-breeder nuclear stations; - Invest in a high-speed, magnetic levitation, inter-city rail network; - Allow the building of a new privately-funded airport on reclaimed land in the Thames estuary to reduce the pressure on, and stop the constant expansion of, the South East’s airports. Oil and gas are finite resources, rapidly being depleted. Prices are going to continue to rise significantly and this will place a heavy burden on both industry and private consumers. Furthermore, as we are becoming increasingly dependent on energy from unstable and potentially unfriendly foreign powers we are becoming ever more vulnerable to economic blackmail or even harm. ‘Peak Oil’ is a clear and imminent danger to our economy and society, so Britain needs to invest in new technologies and be broadly self-sufficient in terms of energy. The BNP firmly rejects the “climate change” dogma while being fully conscious of the urgent need to combat all real pollutants in the environment. The time has come for change.

It'd never work. Brown is a control freak and self confessed saviour of the planet when it comes to financial matters. He'd never let anyone other than a puppet do that job.

No, but in a general election there are sometimes anomolies to the national trend based on local issues. http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/briefing/elections/news/2242014.Tories_sweep_into_power_in_Southampton/ Tory group leader councillor Alec Samuels said: "The public did not care for a Lib Lab pact because they weren't consulted." Tory deputy leader councillor Royston Smith said: "We always said the public would judge them and their unholy alliance. Tonight they have done so and we've decapitated both heads of the beast. Labour are a spent force in the city." Whether the bad image of Labour and Liberals in Southampton translates to a general election is debateable, but I do think memories of the unholy alliance will favour the Tories.

That's whta I thought, and is why I believe that the Liberals will want to keep Brown in Power in the event of a hung parliament.

I think Southampton could be classed as a Marginal2 based on the city council results.

One of the latest polls shows the Liberals dropping to 16% and I personally think this is because voters have realised that if you vote Liberal you're taking a gamble as to whether you're actually voting Labour or Tory. To be sure of either keeping Brown or getting rid the only safe way is to vote Labour or Tory.

It's pretty standard talk to consider a majority to mean an overall majority. I'm now feling a lot more confident that we'll get rid of Brown and his cronies anyway.