Barry Sanchez

Doing a job to get by is one thing but doing it for 45 years on/off at the beck and call of the employer is draconian and Victorian, well done boys.

A job thats offers dignity, security and opportunity would be the wisest way to go, you appear to advocate exploitation.

Whats mixed up about wanting positive immigration and looking after the workforce? Seems a rather good idea to me. Sounds like people here want cheap labour, classy.

Thats my point, Jesus wept, they welcome them in and yet think zero hours contracts are good.

Or being an architect with skills as opposed to a person without such. Lopsided and selfish argument.

http://www.mhpbooks.com/amazon-warehouses-literally-worse-than-coal-mines/

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/14/hello-zero-hours-goodbye-workers-rights Seeing as most are quick to quote the Manchester Guardian on here, here is one back. Thatchers children with no principles.

Funny how the capitalists on here who welcome all into this Country screw their own over. Wouldn't want to be in the trenches with you guys........................

Because it does not offer a guaranteed working week, its creates uncertainty to plan for the future.

Poles are positive immigration, negative immigration are the divided towns you probably dont see nor care about, Oldham, Rochdale and Dewsbury are a few examples. I think people confuse immigration with their selfish agendas, integration in the British way of life is key without the immigrants losing their identity, the extreme left would sell this whole Nation for the benefit of the immigrant, on irony stopping them from coming as they would destroy what was attractive to them in the first place.

I go to Goodison sometimes and to a point I would agree but for the price he has been a success no doubt.

So why did we sign Wanyama, Jelavic has done ok for Everton, lazy mate.

A disgrace, no Union activity in these places either, Amazon is the leading player in this work model.

As it stands we have Lambert who is a great player but a back to front striker, we need a nippy in and out goalscorer, a proven one of course in the League we could never afford so we shall probably get Defoe instead.......................

We need a young goal scorer, sure it may not work out but we have taken lots of punts before on Celtic players, Wanyama would know him as well. Wolfswinkel for the price is a snip, thats my point, they appear to have bought well and wisely, Mayuka was a complete gamble and so its has been proved, Forren as well, my money is the Norwich signings being a tad more successful.

So you dont consider Hooper and Wolfswinkel good signings as a team looking to progress?

I fully agree.

So would I.

Finished the sherry now found the port...................................

He ****ing loves the limelight.

Very good now go and research the said players Garrett.

Never been on there but there are precious little flowers on here and I can only assume two sites cant have as many dandies as this.

Yes as they play in different positions quite possibly Garrett, Hooper is an out and out striker.................................

Daniel Fox is the supreme example of why people should never give up, if he can play in the premiership then there is hope for everyone who kicks a football...................

Good loan move but could we turn it permanent? Another winger, we need a goalscorer.