Jump to content

How about this for a compromise


Secret Site Agent
 Share

Recommended Posts

Instead of Lowe out

Instead of Wilde out

Instead of Wilde crossing the chamber again and Leon Crouch back in

 

How about they all sit down, take off their ego’s at the door. Form a coalition with other interested parties. And work together with each other in this crisis to save the club and keep us in the CC this season, with a realistic plan for the future.

 

That will also include the Lowe bad/Lowe good types coming together to support the team.

 

And try and encourage the ‘I am going because of Lowe’ chappies and chappess’ to return.

 

And if you are quickly trying to type, ‘ I can’t afford to go, I live too far away, you can’t make me..’ then please don’t bother. That is a given, and I’m not interested in it here. If there is a reason for not going that is not linked with ‘’Cause I aren’t filling Lowe’s pocket’ that is fine. There, I’ve said it twice.

 

But if we are discussing a crisis strategy, would you not attempt to change you outlook and attempt to attend at home again?

 

And do you think a crisis board would work?

 

How would you propose it be structured?

 

Would it be possible for egos to be left at the door? Or will it be a bun fight?

 

Should our banners read, ‘For **** Sake, Work Together, ****s’ Rather than ‘Lowe and Wild out’? We can only urinate with the appendage we have got.

 

Remember, let be convincing, coherent, cogent, and well-argued, with lucid rational replies based on reason please, we are not at home to Mr ‘Because I say so’, or Mrs ‘unreasonable rant that adds nothing to the debate’ today.

 

Over to you, my brothers and sisters in Red and White.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crouch trying to negotiate with Lowe will be like Morgan Tsvangirai trying to negotiate with Robert Mugabe.

 

Lowe will say something like "OK, you can come back on the board, so long as I am Chairman".

 

Bizarre considering he owns less shares than either Crouch or Wilde....

 

Suppose we have Guy Waaanker Askham for keeping him in power, as usual..

 

Its a nice idea, but fails to take into account the egos involved, which wont be left at the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...