alpine_saint Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 ...if Rooopey-baby and the Golden Duo (tm Scooby) hadnt decided we could go nearly two-thirds of the season without a striker ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 ...if Rooopey-baby and the Golden Duo (tm Scooby) hadnt decided we could go nearly two-thirds of the season without a striker ???? Oh that`s not fair we had McGoldrick.................oh sorry... i see your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadgerBadger Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 Where would we be now if NP was still our manager....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 27 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 27 January, 2009 I know. We could play this game all night........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadgerBadger Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 I know. We could play this game all night........ This thread's got legs....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 Where would we be now if NP was still our manager....... Challenging for the playoffs imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 This thread's got legs....... Unlike McGoldrick!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 Challenging for the playoffs imo. Steady. I'm of the opinion we'd be higher up the table, maybe 15th or so, but challenging for playoffs is a tad rash don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 Steady. I'm of the opinion we'd be higher up the table, maybe 15th or so, but challenging for playoffs is a tad rash don't you think? I don't think so. With Pearson we had a manager who could get the best out of players so there's no reason why we couldn't have been one of the surprise teams that always gets into the play-offs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted 27 January, 2009 Share Posted 27 January, 2009 I don't think so. With Pearson we had a manager who could get the best out of players so there's no reason why we couldn't have been one of the surprise teams that always gets into the play-offs. Fair enough mate. I do rate Pearson very highly and I believe he'd get alot more out of these players than Poortvliet or Wotte ever could. However, I still think playoffs is a bit ambitious. Unfortunately, we'll never be able to find out who's right, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now