Weston Super Saint

Are you saying this isn't the Eastenders forum?

Unlike spending £30k to put the team in an hotel before the game against Palace, and flying all de bhoysh over to Dublin for their Xmas party. Financially prudent those ideas

One good thing will come out of all this; Lowe WILL unite the majority of the fans of SFC. Unfortunately for him, they will be united AGAINST him

Don't you dare!!! We've already got enough serious people on this bored!!

Fixed it for you!!

I wouldn't worry too much, no-one will be any the wiser once he's given his answers

Not until January now eh? Even you guys must be getting bored of these substance less rumours from 'reliable sources' I wouldn't take Adams leaving as a sign of investment coming if I were you, his cards are pretty much marked at the moment aren't they? It's a shame that Gaydamak went with him in the first place as he is very much the 'cheap' option, I'd expect nothing less from us, but surely Gaydamak hasn't been getting advice from Rupert has he? I look forward to administration in January, IF it gets rid of Rupert and the other numpties in charge of our club

The biggest difference is now that punch in the head is licensed and endorsed

Unfortunately RobskII is a full member. Baj could have retired by February otherwise

It must be a first, but I find my self agreeing with Wiltshire :shock:

Working in a pub that used to have lots of younger people in it, I would agree that it is probably about 80-90%. However I would have said the age bracket is about 17-25 rather than 21-39 mainly because people of my age [35] would not have had such a prevalence of the drug when we were out 'clubbing'. I think it's probably on a par with 'E's' from the 80's where I was probably in the 10% that could never be bothered to try them....

It'd be fun! We'd need a lock in though as we'd never agree

Equipment is ALWAYS repaired until it reaches the point where it is no longer economical to repair it - ie it is cheaper to replace with new than the cost to repair it.

And that, unfortunately is why that system wouldn't work, someone, somewhere will ALWAYS fell aggrieved

Isn't this covered by Maslow's hierarchy of needs? This esoteric back slapping that you refer to is much higher up the needs than the need to earn money, put food on the table and a roof over your head - basic human needs - unless of course they are all provided by the state for everyone, then they will literally just be basic!!

Which is what yours was isn't it, and thus all the knowledge you have gained from buying a stairlift!!!

I read it. I just don't happen to agree with all of it!! It's what makes the world interesting when people have differing views!!! You label it as knee jerk reactions though which is kind of weird I also don't agree with your example!! A stockbrokers only purpose in his/her working life - rightly or wrongly - is to make money. If they are good at that job then they will make a lot of money. Unfortunately not all people are able to make money like that so they aren't all stockbrokers!! It's almost like natural selection if you like!! Anyway, there MUST be enough people that are both able to wipe arses and willing to do so, because simple economics - which you probably don't agree with - dictates that if there wasn't the supply then the demand would increase and the price would rise, hence the wages would be better. I don't see anything wrong with that if I'm honest. Also, where did we get state run banks from?? I'd be just as happy to see the poor performing banks go to the wall and really don't want the taxes I pay to go towards propping them up. You yourself have already admitted that state run enterprises seem to have a little too much excess fat around the seems, do you really think the banks will be on top of their game if they became state run?

No. There were some Sheff Utd fans there too

I'm more than happy to accept that some stair ways are going to be complex and require bespoke systems, but I would suggest that the majority of people would save money installing a second hand system. Help the Aged seem to agree with me too!! http://www.helptheagedshop.co.uk/stairlifts/Stairlift-Purchase.asp

LOL. So you've contradicted your own beliefs already :shock: You say 'Bankers' aren't really worthwhile, but I'd suggest that if you were forced to keep all your money under your mattress you might hastily re-assess this. Also, if you pay people more money I would suggest that they will spend more, better cars, bigger houses etc, which effectively will only really move the balance of wealth, with some people still super rich and others super poor. Also (DSM), how exactly are we - I'm assuming you mean the population of the UK rather than TSW users - going to decide on the most 'valued' jobs. I think we can both see which way the 'masses' are likely to vote, with people like Jade Goody and Wayne Rooney being the uber valued class

I wonder if they're referring to that match or the club in general

Who is to decide which job is and isn't 'worthwhile'? What do you mean by 'valued', is it monetary reward?

You got a quote from ONE supplier who told you something and you believed it! Can you let me know next time you're shopping for diamonds

I got offered a freebie ticket for this game. I turned it down. I don't even want to NOT pay to go and watch our reserves v their reserves

Maybe they're all Man U fans :smt102