Jonnyboy

SOG and Johnny with their righteous crusade against innocent people being slaughtered.

Await the ‘serial killers are bad’ thread so we will know where you stand on another controversy

I don't know, serial killers of incel types I could get behind.

Come on boys. Smash cherries 3-0 and it's game on again!

Yes but that doesn't really work when you widen the intolerance net to encompass everyone to the right of corbyn.

Damn liberals not wanting to run over women for not putting out.

I can look after myself thanks but I expect whelk is just highlighting the famed lefty values of tolerance and care that are on display.

It's actually a paradox, we need to be intolerant of intolerance.

No debate just you and your gang attacking Hypo. Ahh the liberals are so sweet.

Awww does snowflake Hypo need daddy Whelk to give him a cuddle.

So your evidence that I'm alt right is a frog avatar combined with the use of the phrase "virtue signaller"? (a common phrase that predates the alt rights existence.) that's pretty flimsy evidence at best...

Whatever you are, it's not coming across as something good.

Indeed. The cross is extra racist you're right. Or possibly I used the image because I knew the faux outrage it would inspire in certain virtue signaller on here who would rather get in a lather about a cartoon frog image than actual violence IRL...

Oh how witty, well done. I'll just change mine to swastika.

I see you all over any Jeremy cotlrbyn thread but I'm not labelling you a communist.

 

Pepe is only ever labelled "alt right" by thick people or people who have no understanding of its meaning. I assume you consider the kekistani flag to be racist.

I find Wikipedia quite reliable, it is a common alt right symbol. To me, adding a St George's Cross with it is either trolling or extra thick.

I'm not an MRA. I know its easier to put people in boxes but sadly you're mistaken.

Odd that I somehow knew you'd be all over this thread though.

Also strange that you have an "alt right" avatar under which banner various types of losers fall such as Richard Spencer and incel terrorists.

I assumed you were a prominent member.

But they are men's rights activists like yourself.

2 away goals though.

Have they done any study showing that there's big club bias by the refs? Would be nice to be shown to be proven.

Yes, it was great on the road watching us bang in 4 at Sunderland, 4 at Watford, 3 at Wet Spam, great memories of cup wins at Arsenal and Liverpool. There was also a lot of dross, but I always felt we were well organised unlike this shambles of a season.

 

Now your turn, all the questions are set out in post 506...

Wembley was great too.

We have done out best to support and pump up the "big clubs"

 

Didnt Someone post the other day that it's over 700 days since we beat a top 6 side in the league?

And they've all paid handsomely to be able to dismantle that brief phase when little Saints were a threat.

No its not. He managed to drop 17 points from our 15/16 season and if he did the same again this season (not impossible given the way our season ended under him) then ironically we'd be on 29 points and relegated.

So why is he on course with Leicester to beat his total points with Saints?

Of course it’s not a fact.

No but it's highly likely.

That's a prime example of why we haven't sold out the semi allocation.

Will Hughes finish with less points per match than Pellegrino?

I'm not even mad. We ballsed it up weeks ago at Newcastle and West Ham and in not sacking MoPe sooner.

I'm sad to say I stopped watching even streams after Newcastle.

Seems Hughes may even finish the season with less points per game than Pellegrino which I didn't think would be possible.

Sometimes, even though you're the walking definition of a Berkshire hunt, you accidentally hit the nail on the head. You're right - this government equates immigrants with criminals. Hence the cretinous targeting of the Windrush children - all perfectly legitimate British citizens whose only offence years ago was to fail to apply for a British passport.

Hello? Can you hear me?

After Corbynista indulgences in Jew-hating (including threats to MPs complaining about threats) and as outsourcers of Putin's propaganda machine, we have the spectacle of Corbyn himself falling flat on his face in front of an open goal over Windrush.

 

His befuddled failure to respond to May’s statement that the decision to destroy the registration cards was taken under a Labour government in 2009 allowed the most incompetent PM of recent times off the hook.

 

Fixating on the cards was beyond stupid. The real issue was that the ‘hostile environment’ toward immigrants and their paperwork (TM Theresa May) was ruining lives of British citizens. Corbyn’s rabbit-in-the-headlights act showed he’s incapable of understanding this.

 

As it was, May left her seat in the chamber with a smirk on her face.

 

Fortunately, journalists from the hated MSM, like Amelia Gentleman, have done the hard work of exposing this scandal and keeping the pressure on the government in a way that Corbyn simply can’t do.

You care more about attacking Corbyn than you do any of these immigration issues.

Or did you support Corbyn, McDonnell, Lucas and Abbott in 2014?

http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.com/2018/04/who-were-18-mps-who-bravely-voted.html

west ham might not get another point this season

We can welcome them to our club then.

I'd been totally avoiding the football after the Chelsea result. Just looked at that really was yet another shyte weekend of results for Saints.

Bexy's mum's been on the telly again.

 

Such edgy humour.

I hate this, "we're just as bad as them," argument.

 

We aren't using chemical weapons against our own civilians in our own streets. Neither are we giving military support to a government which is. With regards to that story, I'm much more inclined to believe our government was simply incompetent in accurately moderating the sales of these chemicals, by a third party, rather than maliciously selling chemical weapon ingredients to a dictator.

 

Also, journalists who criticise our government don't keep dying in tragic accidents/suicides/heart attacks.

We are giving military support to a government that uses cluster bombs in civilian area of another country though,so where's the difference?

Don’t agree, sorry.

On another note, I notice Jezza said he would go into ‘action’ if Russia gave the nod.

Says the man asking for concrete sources