Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    56,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by trousers

  1. What is undervalue ???? the football club is the PLC s only revenue stream .

     

    If they sold it for any less than the share value that would be deemed as undervalue , and if they can sell it for the share pricethen you dont con the share holders.

     

     

    Could this explain why "someone" has been driving down the share price recently? Or so it would seem....

     

    Hmmm.....

  2. ?? I hope you're not a lawyer.

     

    1) An Administrator could seek remedy against either the purchaser or the Directors if the assets were sold at an undervalue unsder section 238 of the insolvency act. IF THEY WERE SOLD AT UNDERVALUE being key. There is nothing wrong with selling assets if you get fair value for them.

     

     

    Minor side observation, but could that be why the Concourse Sale was scrapped this year?

  3. I would like to catch out a guy at work, and was wondering if anyone has any good ideas, or pranks they have played before! any suggestions greatfully recieved

     

    Start a thread entitled: "*** LOWE QUITS SFC !!!!! *****"

     

    Well, that's what I'll be doing anyway.

  4. A 3 year graph might suit your agenda (i.e pro Lowe rhetoric) but in the real World Sladey sensible people would look at the performance since the credit crunch occured. Over this period SLH has weathered the storm considerably worse than the AIM.

     

    Got one of those 'Leisure industry only' AIM graphs yet? Or was that my job? :)

  5. The thing which worries me about all this is that people are forgetting this is a gamble Lowe has taken. Speaking from a business perspective point of view i would say it is a massive risk to the future of the company.

    It is like the chips are all down and only way you win is if you avoid the drop.

    Now the bookies don't have us faring so well as they all have us 2nd favs down. So we will have to proove everybody wrong and win enough points to keep us up which in turn will keep us out of admin.

     

    However if the critics and bookies are right and we sadly fail to stay up then we are most likely into admin. If we are on the brink of it now and we then go down we will cut out a vast amount of our revenue from tv rights and exposure. The FL rights were bought by Sky for £264m. From next season Sky will show 65 live CCC games and BBC will show 10. Meaning next season the CCC will have almost as many prem games being broadcast live. That brings more revenue as the exposure increases. £264m for 3 years = 88m a year in tv revenue. That is a vast amount of money. Which means every club in the CCC gets nearly £4m a year just from tv money.

    The League 1 teams get just 12% of the deal. Which means each club gets just over 500k a season. If that happens to Saints they will be nearly £3m out of pocket by dropping a league. Without investment the club would not be able to run due to the interest of the £20m+ debt being more then the revenue the club makes. Which means admin almost certainly.

     

    Now i'm glad the club has avoided going into admin, it gives us a chance to sort the problems out without having to go to the courts, means we can sort it out on the pitch. Which is the way it should be.

     

    But if we do go down and we do then go into admin we then risk dropping to league 2 because of this decision. We will go into the league one campaign with fewer players and with less quality players. We won't have the money to pay wages for Journey men to help get us out of it ala Leicester style. But worse of all we will go into it with a points deduction. Meaning if this back fires then we will probably be spending next season trying to stop another relegation. A bit like Bournmouth.

    If that happens then we will come back to this point. A point where it was decided to go for it and risk the next few years.

     

    The way i see it i see it as Lowes last stand if you will. I don't like the guy but i respect a lot of things he has done for the club in the past. But if he put the club into admin people would crucify him for it because that means relegation for sure. It would mean he would be gone as he would be removed by the court. It would effectively be him and his board throwing in the towel.

    Lowe will not let go of power until the empire has fully crumbled. So while i think the board deserve good words for not going into admin and condemning us down, i also think people need to realise that chances are it would not happen unless the banks made that decision for us by stopping our overdraft.

    So for all our sakes i hope the boys play out of their skin and get the wins we need to survive. Anything less and things will get even worse before they get better.

    At the end of the day this club needs money, we need investment. Without that things will always be hard.

     

    So, given that we'll be shaagged financially one way or another if/when we go down, wouldn't the 'best' thing to do now be to blow caution to the wind and recall all of our 'expensive' players and spend the money and be damned?

     

    What is there to lose?

     

    Either:

     

    (a) We stay up and use some of the new £4m TV money to pay back the extra we spent on the experiences players for the last 7 games

     

    or

     

    (b) We still end up being relegated but the money's gone so who cares?

×
×
  • Create New...