Sheaf Saint

Not the view of Cardines who is shooting in this image, that's true. But he's in an almost direct line of sight between Peretz and Tolaj, who scored the goal, and looked to be just offside still when the ball was put in the net. If that was in the PL and scored against City or Liverpool then VAR would rule that out I reckon.

So what you're saying is that when it came to the nitty gritty, Bristol City were pretty shitty and the ref showed no pity for the reality of their activity, thus giving his complicity.

I only caught the first 20 mins and had to take my daughter out to a birthday party. Have I missed much?

Which they won't be able to do for 90 minutes.

No you're not mistaken But...

Hate to say it, but Ballard's and Morishita's were better.

Point proved.

So you don't see anything wrong with falsely doxxing RNLI volunteers and calling them traitors, but you do think that the Daily Mail publishing the name of his roofing company, the registered address of which is already a matter of public record, is unacceptable and proves that the state is now far-left fascist?

"I DEMAND TO HAVE MY VOICE HEARD"... ...says man in balaclava who didn't want to be named.

You do realise that the word "attack" has many meanings and doesn't necessarily imply physical violence, right? Naming and shaming someone who risks their life to save others, and branding them as traitors or treasonous, is quite obviously an attack. What's your evidence for this?

Which bit of "Officers were injured and vehicles were damaged" do you not understand?

Madgwick was on the lunchtime news calling for people to be careful of their behaviour when tensions are high. Any idea why tensions might be high George?

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/sep/09/protestors-outside-portsmouth-hotel-confuse-pakistan-cricket-team-migrants Stay classy Portsmouth 👍

True. However, the same applies to ANY group of people, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status. But you would have to have the IQ of a fucking potato to think that is in any way a valid reason to condone attacks on volunteer public servants.

Of course he hasn't. He read that rage bait headline somewhere and repeated it as fact because it fits his narrative, and will ignore/refuse any requests to substantiate it. He has form for this.