Greenridge

maybe not, but as we know, he's a very naughty boy.

Is that Just For Men, Autumn Gold?

What's the practical implications of some kind of FA 'ban'? Not allowed to train the team / be involved match days / sit on the bench / other? I imagine UK employment law means they can't stop him from 'working'?

You want a 30% discount off next years season ticket, yes? You do realise the state of the finances at the Club I take it? Parachute payments falling away, EFL TV rights vs Premier, question marks over sponsorship options for the coming season, fines for Spygate etc etc, and you want to reduce their main income stream by 30%? You do the math as they say.

Yep, bankrupt the Club. That sounds like a cracking idea. Genius.

Nothing yet but the Club did say up to 14 days so I'll happily wait till then.

EFL Regulation 127 was put in place after the Biesla affair. Biesla had a bit of a get out. Eckert didn’t.

Penalties for individuals will go ahead regardless of whether they remain employed by the club.

The EFL have set the tone. I'd expect the FA to follow suit in terms of relative punishment.

There is not a chance that he will stay. Not a single chance.

Reputational damage will mean sponsorship for the 26/27 season will be very interesting….

He was pretty positive in his post match comments just now. Certainly more pro-Saints than Lee Hendrie was as commentator.

Please don't set them that challenge!

Recent history seems to dictate that we replace a player with someone of lesser quality pretty much every time. Well, it feels that way anyway.

Won the match. Lost the xG.