qwertySFC

Need a bucket and cold sponge man - skilled at use of spraying deep heat - can run in short bursts and not spill a drop - Then I'm your man. Style - Denis Rolf - Fitness - Sprint to a causality in under a minute Preferred position - Touch line with T Shirt Skills - Loud voice for shouting

Yes Guy, I expect they have poooed their pants after last night !!!!! http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/pompey/whittingham-pompey-can-make-rivals-worry-1-4886140

Appy or Andy Awful I recon

heres a bit about HMRC make of it what you will http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=105932

An MP doing her job Excerpt from yesterday's Hansard Penny Mordaunt (Portsmouth North, Conservative) “Today there has been much discussion about individuals’ and businesses’ tax obligations to the state for the benefit of one’s fellow citizens. We have not heard much about the state’s obligations towards our citizens and businesses with regard to tax collection, and I want to rectify that today. Paying tax, being compliant and paying a fair amount is a two-way street. It is morally right that we should pay our taxes; evasion and aggressive avoidance are wrong. But just as the Government have a moral duty to spend taxes wisely and get good value from our public services, so, too, HMRC has a moral obligation to the taxpayer to ensure that its requests are reasonable and fair...” “…Governments must take responsibility for their mistakes too. The Minister will be aware that I have had correspondence with him on the principle of retrospective taxation. It obviously behoves the Government to close loopholes as they are revealed, or better still to anticipate and remove them during the legislative drafting process. Nevertheless, when a loophole has been found in legislation, it is not illegal for it to be exploited—possibly morally repugnant, but not illegal. When clause 55 of the 2008 Finance Bill was discussed in Public Bill Committee, the Minister voiced the Conservative Opposition’s concern about its retrospective nature. If it was wrong to legislate retrospectively in 2008, it cannot be right now. We must work to close tax avoidance loopholes, but we must consider whether it is morally justifiable to take retrospective action on tax avoidance in the case of relatively low earners who signed up to schemes that were advertised openly and publicly and of which the Government and HMRC were aware...”

Such a shame that if they get an extra £4m - that people they actually owe money to won't see a penny of it !!!!

Mind you I can console myself with just one thought - For all of the bestest claims, the 250,000 deluded bed wetters on Southsea common , the players going public saying how great the club is to play for , the Terry Henery giving them a round of applause as went off after stuffing them , the AC Milan saga , harry Redflaps spiritual home No one , and I repeat no one wanted to buy them outright . Fu@k me what an opportunity some business bloke missed out on.

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/pompey/pompey-fears-over-points-deduction-next-season-1-4852481 FFS - Don't you get just hacked off with the whinging - I'll remind them what's not fair - Paying 2p in the pound to all the 100's of business they choose to shaft , whilst still paying over the top wages when it was clear they did not have the cash, trying to wrangle out of the DEBT THEY accumulated , they have no balls and should just man up and take it on the chin - just really annoys me that they use the sympathy call every fuc@ing importunity -

The preferred bidders, Pompey Supporters' Trust, have been approved by the Football League as well as the club's creditors. Just a thought but is this true ? I thought the FA had a set of caveats attached to any takeover by PDT or have they actually achieved over come these ?

Andy Awfull says how bad it is that poor ole Pompy can't compete with other academies - but has re-assured potential parents of young starlets that they just need to bear with them during this difficult period - so locally the options will be Staplewood or...................... Just as a side note - the architects for staplewood are also involved with ;............... AFL in conjunction with Foster & Partners are to be appointed to develop the refurbishment and extension of Camp Nou. AFL will be employed as stadium design advisors to Foster & Partners. The scheme involves increasing the capacity by 8000 seats to 106,000 total, also forming new corporate facilities and players facilities and the upgrade of all public concourses. The project also includes the construction of a new roof to the whole of the stadium and the re-cladding to the exterior.

Category 1 academies will have high contact time with young players, require a minimum of 18 full-time staff and an operational budget of £2.5 M Think we can mange that Mind you - I wonder how much of the transfer fees , wages. image rights offered by the fishey few could have gone into academy development ?

I am humbled now Hutch - I will be standing corrected all day thank you

Correct me if I'm wrong - is part of the multi national takeover or PDT - was to reduce the funding of the academy ?

I think it's called we will deal with that when we are in court or come to an agreement and pay you 2p of what we owe

With so many fingers in the pot - If the PDT go ahead next year I can still see the accusations flying around about - Free this & free that, how come this how come that , I'm a share holder I was not asked about this, free hospitality - it's going to happen - They will be constantly having to justify the freebies , be seen as "free loaders" when it kicks off - Can't wait

Loan , Help , Assistance , will be paid back - Call it what you like but the perception is this; From the Sun http://http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4816642/Portsmouth-survival-hopes-boosted-by-city-council-loan.html

There are more twists and turns to come yet me ole Nutjobs - Nothing is guaranteed until Justice "closing down" Sales - Oh and has a date actually been set ?

Just what you need when you have a huge decontamination job on

And let's face it - IF the fishey few fans really believed in their club and really wanted it to survive - The loans, property deals would never be required as the "shares" (donations) would have covered the lot - so much for the bestest fans

But Phil - will you be having the Lidl bubbly as Rallyboy clearly states they have every day after reading the Snooze ?

Progress The Debenture with Portsmouth Community Football Club Limited provides for: i) A first legal mortgage of Fratton Park ii) ]A fixed charge over other property either currently owned or owned in the future iii) A floating charge over all other property, assets and rights either currently owned or owned in the future v) That no other legal charges are made against the income or assets of the Club beyond those set out in the PST Business Plan received on 1 August 2012 without prior consent of the City Council Progress LOL where have I seen that in the past .. All the fuss about Chinny and now they are happy to sign away what ever it takes to save the deluded few - Double standards or what !!!

Not a lot due to vast amount of Housing Support

NOOOOO They have been ready for months - honestly, don't you read the Snooze, keep up man

Now - call me cynical but here's the results of the last local election - not many votes between the 1st and 2nd (cough cough) http://http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/portsmouth-city-council-elections-results-1-3806778 IF - you are seen to be the savior of our fishey friends pipe dreams - even if it never comes off , valuable material for any campaign - you can see it now as they drive around in their open top wheelchairs with the mega phone - We are the ones who tried and offered the money but the nasty FL stopped us but vote for us we are on your side "

Question: How do we Nutjobs find this info which is easily found in the public domain - another myth about the ground and lying dormant longer than Chernobyl