Mole

With londonsaint anyone and evryone is to blame apart from his beloved Rupert.:smt049:smt049:smt049

Criticism coming from you that really hurts. I've started having nightmares of you coming after me in your little tank.

Was that the game when Le Tiss missed a penalty or was it the reverse fixture at the dell. I was there but it's a long time ago. I think it was at the City Ground though.

The refusal of SISU's offer must then be considered a huge mistake.

And can you really see meek Mike wanting to get rid of Lowe. If he did that he'd have to do some work.

He may offer his resignation as a token gesture if he knows it'll be declined - like he did the last time.

Pearson was up and coming and his performance with the Foxes shows he's got more potential than the lower league rejects we plucked from Hollands equivilent of the blue square premier.

Without a shadow of a doubt Lowe will be most to blame for the relegation. We had a cracking manager in Nigel Pearson who united the club and who the players respected. Lowe then undid the feelgood factor and brought in two failed Lower league rejects from Holland. Lowe also loaned out Saga to Aalborg and in my opinion he would have contributed enough points to have pulled us clear had he been available all season. Once again Lowes incompetent decisions will be the reason for the continuing demise of the club.

That's funny. Does this mean Ruperts cheerleaders won't consider Wotte sucessful if he keeps us up?

Lowe could simply have said "the board have decided to bring in sir Clive Woodward and Jim smith needs to make way for the appointment." i.e THE TRUTH.

Frank you shock me.

I'm sure the Leicester fans are gutted with their league position.

I would never choose stalin.

Ruperts cheerleaders are bracing themselves for egg on their faces.

:badgrin:

I'll be going with or without a ticket.

I knew i had it in the bag (so long as the nag cleared the jumps) about 8 furlongs out. Denman needed to pull away at this point and he didn't have it in him. Without this happening Ruby dictated the race and the outcome was guarenteed.

I plan to spend more time posting on TSW (probably with a new username).

A spambot telling us we'll be safe. FFS.

Do shut the **** up.

And in the case of Pearson it was OK to say it was done for cost cutting reasons when he already had Wotte and Portvliet lined up?

So it's OK for Lowe to lie. Is that what you are saying?

So you are saying it's fine (in your book) for Jim to be sacked and it doesn't matter if the reason given is the truth or not. So this basically means that in your opinion Lowe is fully entitled to use any excuse (even if it's not the truth) to get his own way. The Jim Smith issue (and you gave your opinion that you thought Lowe lied) is relevent today because it puts questions marks over the reasons given for the removal of Pearson and the loaning out of Saganowski. Given your belief that Lowe lied about Jim Smith do you think we can believe anything he ever says?

Smith is just an example of Lowe using the same reasons for the removal of an employee as he did with Pearson. You and Sid have both agreed that you think Lowe lied so if he lied then it's reasonable to think his reason for removing Pearson wasn't the truth.