alpine_saint

But its playing much worse as a team. No way will we put 5 goals past Rovers, for example.

Indeed. At least I have the peace of being on his stampy-feet list..

Explain. Why are they silly ?

And you have the temerity to lecture me in your previous post.

None of those "facts" are sufficient for quantifying the transfer value.

I asked him how he felt he was able to put a number on his value, he was unable to answer so he started being silly. Not an issue of respect at all.

Half a pint of mild and a pack of salted peanuts.

Loony logic has that effect on anyone.

You go right ahead and guess. At least you described it for what it is.

Right, I thought so. Completely incapable of justifying that comment, so you decide to be childish.

My predictions

Nope, you've lost me completely there.

And you came up with the figure of 500K how, then ?

I didnt express an opinion either way.

Nope. You are inferring we have had two good performances two games into the season. Spin, spin, spin. "Drama queens", "Wrist slitters", "teletext warriors"; cut out all the childish abuse and have a bit more respect for the opinions of others.

What makes you qualified to express that opinion ?

You ask what I want ? I want the manager to take up the resources he has been offered, use them effectively and deliver on all the fine words bandied about and the plan he was brought into execute. Whether you like it or not, we have wasted the transfer window and the ability to build a squad for promotion and beyond in the Championship due to exceptionally low-key activity, and wasted over a month of preparation time to ensure the team was prepared physically and tactically to start as they meant to go on. We are playing catch-up on both the transfer front and the peformance /points front. Now, I couldnt care f**king less who he brought in to improve the weak areas (CM, pace, wingers, etc.) as long as he did so. Apart from Richardson and Butterfield, to cover the RB issue, in my opinion until the Goolie signing none of the weak areas had been addressed. Obviously, having had Antoino and Papa on loan last season with a reasonable degree of success, it would have been the lowest risk approach to bring them back. For whatever reason, the club decided not to pursue this, so its down to them to find the players for the weak areas still not addressed. Until Goolie plays and shows us what he is capable of, I see him as high-risk to our promotion aspirations, since he has come from abroad and never played in our league, unlike Antonio. Now, I could go on all night giving justifications for my opinion, but you wouldnt listen anyway. If me sticking to my opinion annoys you and other "people", so be it.

Sneer, sneer, sneer. And you cant even make your mind up if cup matches count or not, all in one sentence.

As long as this happens in order to widen our attacking options, I will try to restrain myself.

Why is it the probable explanation ? Why is it more probable than we simply didnt ask ?

I have sung the same song, but I can still walk away, analyse events on and off the pitch and conclude that the club or team has issues in an objective manner. Thanks for confirming your delusional behaviour though. Well Done.

Its a valid explanation, as is that AP didnt show enough strength of conviction when Antonio's loan was arranged. Ho-hum. If there is no chance of him coming back now, I suppose this is all academic. AP said we will sign a pacy winger. Let's hold him to it.

This whole site is made up of people trying to score points against one another. But you can be dishonest and single me out if you wish...

Nowhere near as badly as your woeful punctuation does.

As I said to you earlier this week, you support Saints how you see fit and are able, and extend me the courtesy of doing the same. I am not the only person who has commented on your refusal to view things objectively by any accepted definition of the word.