Guided Missile

Brexit is not the reason that an Indian company is cutting costs. They may be telling unions that, but it is total bulsh!t. It's all down to satisfying their investors. I recall years before the referendum that Ford withdrew investment from Southampton and moved their production to Turkey. This was the reason, but the scapegoat of Brexit wasn't available to Ford at that time: EU membership worked out well for Southampton, didn't it lads?

Oh, and my point is that Labour fought for the publication of legal advice on Brexit, before a vote, a stance which I admired, but for some reason didn't do the same when the public swallowed the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" b0ll0x Blair peddled...

I was happy about the Chilcot inquiry, even though it cost £13.5M. A second referendum on the Iraq war wouldn't have brought back the 182 British lives that were lost. That was the true cost and for what? I find it sad that there are some on this thread would want Blair back. That fact says a lot about both the posters with the memories of goldfish and the current leader of the Labour party...

Here's an extract from the Government leaflet, published here: Read the f***in' leaflet, delivered to every household in the UK, at a cost of £9.3M and tell me how the people that voted leave, were in any doubt about what may happen and what they were voting for. I've ordered my yellow jacket, BTW...

If the public had been offered a referendum on whether to invade Iraq, my guess is we would have voted against it and thousands of lives would have been saved, particularly if the public had seen the legal advice regarding that war, at the time.

I should thank this thread (Bexy?) for highlighting this tweet. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it is from October and seems to be the only rational explanation for what is going on. Otherwise, our government really is dumb...

Today's more important news: Obviously, the f***ers have tried to hide the news behind their ambush of May. I say get into the lifeboats ASAP...

Draghi ends QE and the storm clouds gather: "Only when the tide goes out do you discover who has been swimming naked"

I forgot to tell you my dog's called Lord Owen and wrote this article in the Times this year: Woof, woof...

Herbert having a mare...

Mate, I didn't bother to read it. I asked my dog and he said I should consider referring it to the EJC, because he didn't have jurisdiction over what he thinks is primarily an international treaty and open to interpretation, that only they could rule on.

So, contrary to Herbert's arrogant contention that a no deal won't get through Parliament, the latest news here from the Grauniad...

Not quite as simple as your dog thinks, Herbert:

Back on ignore for you Herbert, but I'll leave you with this article from September, 2018: Woof, woof...

Keep squirming Herbert, AKA the gravel and cement king of Southampton....

Answer my original question and I might answer yours. Why do you and Herbert assert that Parliament can prevent the Government leaving the EU on a no deal basis?

These guys have:

You'd better ask Herbert about the future. He's the one making a fortune gambling on currencies. My point was that if the Government determine it is in the the national interest to leave the EU without a deal, Parliament can't stop them. I still can't work out why you think they can.

Keep digging, Herbert....you having a mare is hilarious. #Loadsamoney

Here's me quoting Dominic Raab and Andrea Leadsom from this article, published a week ago. Still, as I am humouring you, I'd be interested in you explaining, in your own words, how you think Parliament can prevent a "no deal" Brexit, because Herbert has already made a fool of himself trying...

Herbert Von W@nkstain - Champagne Socialist

Obviously the ECJ has ruled, very coincidentally and the day before the meaningful vote, that the UK can revoke Article 50, but not to extend the process. These postdated the article I quoted, but I'm not sure how this supports your argument as Dominic Grieve's amendment to the Withdrawal Act wasn't mentioned in the ECJ judgement.... Best get Herbert to draft a response for you, although he's probably tired from reading up about Parliamentary Democracy....

Herbert Von W@nkstain having a mare....

Oh, look, Herbert's got a hand puppet. That's the way to do it....

Exactly...