Jump to content

aintforever

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    15,916
  • Joined

Everything posted by aintforever

  1. I'm pretty sure they would all have been tested, they were probably safe to have a gang-bang.
  2. Nope. The vast majority clapped which was great to see.
  3. Yet you could have changed channel whenever you wanted.
  4. Winners: France Runners Up: Portugal Scotland get knocked out at: Round of 16 Wales get knocked out at: Round of 16 England get knocked out at: Round of 16 Dark Horse (Furthest a team gets excluding England, Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Portugal): Denmark Top Goalscorer: Lukaku UEFA Best Player: Mbappe UEFA Best Young Player: Havertz
  5. Fuck me, talk about tenuous! Taking the Knee - Black Lives Matter - Specific Black Lives Matter Group - People within group with Marxist views - Marxism - Communism - Stalin - Mass murder. You are really not inventing reasons to get angry are you?
  6. Comparing taking the knee to the swastika is just retarded, the Swastika is a logo linked to the murder of millions of people so rightly carries a stigma with it. Anyhow if you actually KNEW the person was wearing it for some other reason, accusing them of being a Nazi or booing them would be just as daft. Taking the knee could be associated with a specific BLM movement but you have already been told that is not the reasoning behind it, so you already know that it is a generic anti racism gesture when you boo. What you are doing is like booing the England Rugby team because they have a rose on their kit and you hate the Labour Party. Dumb as fuck.
  7. The players have explained that there is nothing political in their gesture, we all know it is nothing political - why are you still pissing your pants over the marxism thing when you already know it is not political. You are just inventing reasons to get angry about something, it's bonkers.
  8. I expected everyone to notice, I find it piss funny that you googled it and thought you were being clever in finding out it was copied when anyone with half a brain would know it was.
  9. Clearly a bit slow if you need something that obvious explaining.
  10. What, like ending ‘what do you reckon?’?
  11. The whole point was that it formed part of the question but I would have thought that was obvious. Clearly posts need to be made idiot proof for some on here.
  12. Obviously! ” B.1.617 has several mutations that are present in other variants of interest/concern or that have been shown to have antigenic escape in laboratory experiments. Discussed here are changes in positions 484, 452 and 681. E484Q is present in B.1.617. Mutations in position 484 are present in the three global variants of concern, but these variants contains E484K. There is limited evidence for the role of E484Q in immune escape – it was shown to have reduced neutralisation by some but not all convalescent plasma samples from people who have had natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 using an experimental system (Greaney et al., 2021, Cell Host & Microbe 29, 463–476). L452R is present in B.1.617. This is present in several variants of interest, including B.1.429 (associated with California). This mutation has been associated with weaker neutralisation of the virus by convalescent plasma from people who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and/or some monoclonal antibodies in laboratory experiments. P681R is present in B.1.617. P681R or P681H is also present in several variants under investigation in the UK, including A.23.1/E484K, B.1.1.7 and B1.318. This is located adjacent to the furin cleavage site of the spike protein, which could mean a change in spike protein processing or other changes in biology. More evidence is needed to understand the virus changes that result from the specific combination of mutations present in B.1.617.” So you thick fuckers need quote marks to get that the above was written by a scientist! Brilliant
  13. Yeah, because it wasn’t obviously written by a scientist.
  14. Of course it was, it was Prof Sharon Peacock, Director of COG-UK, and Professor of Public Health and Microbiology, University of Cambridge. Do you disagree with her opinion then? Or is she part of a big conspiracy to prolong lockdown?
  15. That was probably more to do with the fact that Boris was due to fly out and try and do a trade deal with India. Or just a government fuck up.
  16. I'm not a scientist but I have a better grasp that your junior school level understanding. My point was obvious to anyone with half a brain - there are reasons for certain strains being of concern and it's nothing to do with paranoid conspiracy theories thought up by thick twats like you.
  17. Yeah, because I was trying to pass it off as my own. I was just highlighting the fact that he knows fuck all about the science. And there is a reason why certain variants are labelled as of concern, and it's nothing to do with governments wanting to lock people up.
  18. It could all just be a big conspiracy or it could be that B.1.617 has several mutations that are present in other variants of interest/concern or that have been shown to have antigenic escape in laboratory experiments. Discussed here are changes in positions 484, 452 and 681. E484Q is present in B.1.617. Mutations in position 484 are present in the three global variants of concern, but these variants contains E484K. There is limited evidence for the role of E484Q in immune escape – it was shown to have reduced neutralisation by some but not all convalescent plasma samples from people who have had natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 using an experimental system (Greaney et al., 2021, Cell Host & Microbe 29, 463–476). L452R is present in B.1.617. This is present in several variants of interest, including B.1.429 (associated with California). This mutation has been associated with weaker neutralisation of the virus by convalescent plasma from people who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and/or some monoclonal antibodies in laboratory experiments. P681R is present in B.1.617. P681R or P681H is also present in several variants under investigation in the UK, including A.23.1/E484K, B.1.1.7 and B1.318. This is located adjacent to the furin cleavage site of the spike protein, which could mean a change in spike protein processing or other changes in biology. More evidence is needed to understand the virus changes that result from the specific combination of mutations present in B.1.617. What do you reckon?
  19. So you will boo your own players for making a political gesture even though they have already made it crystal clear their gesture is not political in any way. Brilliant Maybe during the close season you can think up other imaginary stuff to get angry about?
  20. Anyone with half a brain can see that it is just a generic anti-racism gesture, clearly you don’t qualify for that. Keep on pissing your pants over the terrible Marxist footballers who want to defund the plod if you want but you are just making stuff up to get angry about.
  21. If you read the players statement they make it clear they are not supporting any political group - you are inventing stuff to get angry about.
  22. Always room for improvement, if The Saints lads want to keep taking the knee before games good on them. I’m certainly not in a position to tell Redmond and Walcott that they should not try and make a difference.
  23. Of course it is, football and society as a whole has moved on a lot in the last few decades.
  24. It's almost as if they are looking for a reason to oppose it, who would have thought. I think we all know the types.
  25. It’s obviously not impossible but it is much much harder than when I got on the ladder, to say otherwise is complete bollocks. When I brought my first house I barely had a penny to my name and my mortgage was 101%, I didn’t have to give up any luxuries whatsoever. Buying was actually easier than renting because I didn’t have to find a deposit in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...