Weston Super Saint

Class is not a requirement in order to consider that vulgar

Depends on your definition of 'class'. Dubai is predominantly 'new' money. Those that enjoy Dubai the most want to see the latest gadgets, supercars, yachts etc. To them, that is what they consider to be 'class'.

To be fair, that wasn't the claim. It is being reported by more than one news outlet. Case closed.

haha, you absolute cretin. You never fail to disappoint. First you claim that it was only reported as a 'super' variant in the Mail. Now your claiming he couldn't possibly have read it in either of the papers I linked to - there are more, I just couldn't be arsed to copy and paste! This seems to be very much like your 'principles', ever changing to suit your current whim! You're all over the place, can you make your mind up, which argument you're going with?

That's the spirit, double down! UNFold times TW News

good old timmy, always gets it wrong! Also reported in : AA.com Helsinki Times Daily Sabah Standard ExpressYorkshire Evening Post I could go on, but you get the point (timmy won't).

It's fascinating that we always hear about these new variants when people start demanding an end to lockdown - or previously to convince everyone that the lockdown was needed.

Outrageous

I feel I must throw myself upon the apology altar as it appears that I have also missed out the 'I' community. Hopefully these flags will make up for my temporary lapse. Reeboted Pride Trans Pride Intersex Pride Bisexual Pride Pansexual pride Nonbinary Pride Asexual Pride Genderfluid Pride Agender Pride Genderqueer Pride Lesbian Pride Original Pride

Let's hope you don't get offered the AZ vaccine then https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-6522913/Almost-1-5-biggest-firms-paid-year-5-got-handout-taxman.html I assume all you post only gets delivered by couriers that you have thoroughly vetted as well

You've missed out the Q's. There's enough hatred and prejudice in the world without you ostracising the entire Q community!

I just wish the OP had managed to get the thread title right, so disrepectful

Whoosh? Perhaps I should have concluded my post with /sarcasm...

Yeah, me too. I like my principles to be on the flexible side so I can decide whether or not I should bother to follow them. Especially when it comes to price. I mean if something seems a little bit pricey I'm happy to chuck those principles out of the window to save a few quid I consider my principles to be elastic, that way I can sleep soundly at night knowing that sometimes I follow them, sometimes I don't. I've also researched all the companies I will ever deal with to figure out which ones are tax 'avoiders' - wait, hang on a minute, which one is the illegal one again, oh it's so confusing isn't it, maybe timmy will know?

Lol. So if something has absolutely no effect on you, then you shouldn't have an opinion on it? Like who should play in goal or up front? What about children's education, not going to make a single difference to pretty much everyone on here (except teachers), so no-one should have an opinion on it right?

Amazon tend to pay the highest rates when they move into an area, which is a good thing surely? Granted they predominantly offer zero hour contracts, but that tends to suit most - those that want to work don't generally go short of hours. Holidays are an average of the last twelve weeks so no one misses out there. Pensions are on a pay as you earn basis. I guess the only other benefit would be sick pay but I have no idea what they do or don't offer....

Not a fucking clue! Why would we replace covid with anorexia or any other disease. The whole 'coversation' started because of what Whelk's mate had said about COVID wards. Once again, you're doubling down with some other bollocks that is completely irrelevant.

Lol. So angry timmy! My claim was pretty clear. I'll break it down for you as you seem to have forgotten what it was : Older people are the ones predominantly in covid wards. 75% of people over 50 are overweight / obese. 74% of people over 75 are overweight / obese. Statistically, it stands to reason that 74% of people over 75 that are in hospital suffering from covid related illnesses are also overweight. This would appear to be true given the anecdotal evidence of Whelk's mate who has a senior position at Soton General. I'm more than 'brave' enough to stand by that claim. It's pretty simple statistics timmy.

In the same way that there is a very clear correlation between older people being fat and occupying covid wards. If you were less pig shit thich you'd know that.

And as if by magic, another 1.7m people are being added to the shielding list. Among those added include people classed by weight (body mass index). Bloody scientists must be listening to those spurious correlations https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51997151

Careful, you'll have timmy citing 'spurious correlations' at you in a minute

That's the spirit timmy. Where's that glorious 'doubling down' screen shot when you need it?

I only hope he doesn't live in a glass house - would be might cold in the winter!

Wow, that's quite a leap! You've gone from 'morally reprehensible' to criminal charges! Not really sure you understand what your argument is....

You're all over the place pal, maybe it's time to dig up the enormously funny whataboutery image? To put it in simple terms for you : Statistically you are more likely to die from Covid complications aged 75 and over (I'm hoping that even you will accept that without having to have links to the proof, especially given the vaccine priorities). Also, statistically, as previously posted and laid out in the link provided, 74% of the UK population aged over 75 are classed as overweight or obese (if you want to argue with that, take it up with the Commons!). Therefore, statistically, it stands to reason that by the law of averages 74% of those aged over 75 in hospital with covid related illnesses are overweight or obese - these are statistical facts that endorse the view of Whelk's post which stated : What the fuck are you babbling on about with cars and kids or are you just trying to pull your own pants down again by proving you haven't really understood the current discussion?