SotonianWill

So Leicester get Coady which only strengthens them further.

I’ve not watched the new Indiana Jones film yet but The Spectator says a more fitting name would be ‘Indiana Jones and the Script by ChatGPT’ which I find quite amusing.

very good, hopefully the players will get used to the possession system and their passing under pressure will get even better. At the moment in that 11 a side (?) at the end it looked a bit scrappy like whoever was on the ball was trying to be too clever. That should clean itself up in a bit. It also looks much quicker than Jones slow paced sunday league stuff. Additionally many of our players are clearly not as fit based off looking at who dropped off the bleep test quick puffing, hopefully RM will see this and continue to push them harder as it was a weakness of ours.

It’s a bit odd. If he goes to Barnsley surely they won’t be paying him 4x his Sheffield Wednesday salary.

interesting to see tella is up there (almost) with JWP. Does this say something about Burnley/Kompany fitness being much better than ours on average, or is this due to individual training during the summer?

Anyone got any bets on saints?

odd, what is the point of the credit? to look nice in your account?

i’d rather downes for that position. But these sort of midfielders have consistently done well in the championship. Skipp, cork, obrien. Anyone who can keep hold of the ball and play simple passes.

If we lose one game i’ll be disappointed. Anything under Readings 106 points would be failure.

Fool. Clearly Russ’s lack of an ironed shirt is because he used up the only electricity he could muster from his solar panel powered home into charging his Tesla last night.

that simply means you have a more idealistic liberal view on life. Contrary to your opinion however, is the majority of people who believe in realism. If my sister was in the changing rooms with a woman with a penis I wouldn’t be very happy with that. It is a danger and to act like it isn’t would be stupid. Can you answer this please - I know there are mixed changing rooms, but what is the reason for differing changing rooms for opposing sexes?

???

Big fan, though he may be pushed around the boardroom

I wish they’d get rid of LGBTQ+ and seperate. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual should not be categorised along with these people. Douglas Murray said support for gay marriage is actually going down, and it’s clearly due to them being grouped with these people. I’m not gay but even I know “Queer” to a gay person is an insult not something gay people going round calling themselves. Surely sane LGBs look at this and think fuck off?

it’s a funny little fuck you to the club who have facilitated his recovery over the past year. 😂 Cant blame him though.

ridiculously low

No matter what happens this summer I doubt at the end of it i’d describe it as painful, especially after the previous season. There’s few id keep but on the whole no worries if any go. It is time for a change.

Money must have come from his Mcdonald’s endorsement based on his eyebrows.

My argument said ideally I’d want an MPs with a mix of both experience or qualifications but you played the boring game of generalising my opinion. Yes, I didn’t believe Rayner had a long enough time frame of experience to justify her place on normality alone. I felt if you were getting in on experience alone i’d much rather someone from a union of longer years who’s been there, done it, seen it all. Is that not the point of experience? What you wrongly insinuated was that I believed (when saying ‘qualifications’) I meant: Prep school, Eton, and a PPE at Oxbridge ? Being a rich investment banker ? Being the son of a Lord and former Cabinet member ? This is completely untrue, education can come from many different places. When I mention Rayners qualifications I am clearly referring to her lack of even basic GCSEs which just 18% leave school without. This is not to knock people without GCSEs but why should I feel encouraged by this person then being in a job as high as “deputy prime minister”, or even shadow education minister which she was beforehand? I’d hope by voting for these people they’d be more qualified than even myself and 80% of the country before becoming a lawmaker in this country.

I agree to some degree. I don’t deny she is an asset as an MP however I don’t see her as a cabinet type. She’s a good reactionary to policy with broad ideas, but as a dictator of policy with detailed analysis I simply don’t see it from whenever i’ve seen her debate. I think Keir has acknowledged this by sidelining her recently.

Sorry mate i’m not going to debate with you as you clearly did not read what I had previously said.

once again as i’ve already explained it has nothing to do with regional accents. It’s more to do with the fact she has no qualifications. Fair enough she was a care worker but she still was elected as an MP in her early 30s. This in my view is too quick to be able to claim educational pros (as she dosent have them) or enough time to claim a “normal life” benefit to electorate. There are many more people who have lived a normal life, are they fit to be in cabinet? Here i’m not advocating for a bunch of poshos leading us, likewise a bunch of people with no qualification just because they’re “normal”. Id want a mix of education and experience of normality. That’s not really a good argument though is it? I’m not looking to vote one as “they’re less thick than the other”. I don’t think either party should be thick on the front bench and it shows the lack of quality that this is the case. Sadly from Rayner v Dowden a couple weeks ago it’s solidified it for me - clearly they’re both out of their depth. I can’t stand petty politics which is why i’ll probably vote neither into power. Sadly, others will.

To be fair this thread had died down before Rob posted in it, but still it is funny to see dissertation apologies. @SaintRob__Have you joined SWF full time?

why make it a northern thing? I just think she’s thick