Bob60

I could, I think most clubs are happy is half of their signings come good, but only have three posts a day so can't be bothered.

Sometimes I think people on here are stupid on purpose. Every club has signings that don't work, with this one we took a gamble that as yet hasn't worked but he is still quite young and playing regularly may help him. Either way with where we are it's a gamble we have to take as we cannot afford the finished article all the time.

Could be a great loan, he has the right attributes but needs games, hope he comes back a better player.

Sell on and still owed some money from the transfer.

Sure I read somewhere that the £4 m was for Sheffield United only as they have a sell on and are still owed some money and that the price to others is nearer £10m

Oh no Leo is going to Watford🤣🤣🤣

Imran Louza left out of squad v Southampton and understood to be set for Watford exit after reiterating desire to leave.

I think Larin deserves credit for the second goal as well, before he came on that clearance goes out for a throw to them. He not only kept it in but laid it off.

Just like larin looked average and Peretz looked average etc etc. If we sign him and he improves a bit and gets 10 goals in a better team and helps create some with good hold up play then he is doing the same as Ross with potential to improve.

And Romeo Akachukw who has impressed in pre season.

Think this is a great move for both him and us, he didn't progress last year and probably wouldn't get much time this year, a straight loan to a top level and we see how he does.

My wild unfounded musings are that over the last few days there seem to have been a few bits from Tonda, that along with him being in the stand to try that out lead me to think that the club have been told off the punishment and it is not too severe and possible a touchline ban. I also think the reason we have not heard is we have appealed, don't think anything was released publicly about Chelsea until after the appeal. As I say just my musings.

I was not talking about the appeal, in his first comments Dragon started that we were told off Boros complaint and given hours to reply just before the first leg, even at the first meeting we admitted what had happened.

Last post, it depends if you believe that everyone in the club knew what was going on, I don't think they did. From what I read the did what they could in the very limited timescale. A football club is a large business we should have been given enough time to fully investigate what had happened before having to reply. Or mistake was not pushing back on the timescales. But different opinions are allowed I believe, this is just my view from conversations I have had.

Is that the one where we were given 12 hours whilst preparing for a big game to respond.