DellBlockH

Fulham.

His vocabulary needs expanding. He only seems to know one adjective (and I expect he has very little direct experience of it).

I remember the Leeds fans singing "We're going to win 4-3" after they went 3-0 down. I thought their gallows humour was quite funny. I didn’t expect them to bloody do it.

Never in doubt.

You forgotten Lallana, in his first spell, already?

Wouldn't bet on it. I was overcharged for a can of IPA because the correct button on the server's screen wasn't working and the supervisor had told him to put all beer in as the more expensive lager. I eventually got an apology from the hospitality manager but I wonder how many people didn’t notice they'd been overcharged at about £1.25 a go.

Whelmed.

This is what I don't understand (among many things I don't understand). SR presumably want a successful football club either for its own sake or because it's worth more the more successful it is. If they want to sell, they will want the highest possible return and this will depend largely on which league the club is in and the assets it has in terms of playing staff. Other assets, like the ground and training ground, won't vary in value according to league. If they want to hang on to the club it (and they) will make more money if it's back in the EPL. So I'm not clear why people seem to think that SR are deliberately sabotaging the club or making wilfully wrong decisions. Yes, you or I may think they are wrong decisions but they must have a reason for making them. They've brought in good players and a few poor ones. I think we can see this happens to most clubs. Some things work, some don't (except West Ham who only seem to bring in poor players). I know nothing about this Larin bloke. The consensus on here is that he is not going to improve our team. The consensus could be right. But why would SR and our scouts want to bring in someone who will make us worse? Does AA want out or do the management team feel, on balance, that the team will survive (or the team mentality will improve) without him? Is it just chasing a few million quid while we have the chance? (Isn't it easy to discard a few million when it's not your money?) I see the argument that SR has a purely player-trading model. But, to keep that going, you need to develop young players to sell on. Larin doesn’t fit that model and I'm not sure our transfer trading balance shows that is happening anyway.

Azazzz

I can only watch the first half so we'd better be done and dusted by half time. After all, we never ease up in the second half, do we?

I don't dispute your general point. But there's an element of confirmation bias here. We see other clubs sign players whom no-one has heard of and who go on to do well. But, as we do not follow those clubs in the same way as we do Saints, we only hear about their successes when they sign obscure players. I'm pretty sure that other clubs make signings out of the blue who turn out to have been unheard of for good reason.

FWIW (which isn't much), I wasn't able to watch the game live but am relying on reports here, the highlights on Sky and the article in The end.Guardian. It seems it was a fairly even game (as you might expect from two teams in the bottom half of The Championship) but that Saints slightly edged it. We perhaps had more chances over the course of the game but were under the cosh towards the end. Like almost every other game this season.

I discovered I had something called Samsung TV last evening and thus was able to watch a bit of Werder Bremen v Eintrach Frankfurt. Bremen have this promising player, who played really well, called Sugawara. Could he DAJFU?

It's pronounced "eye gore". (Young Frankenstein)

Can't think of a single positive thing to say about that shambles of a performance. I suppose seeing Stewart back on the pitch might just qualify as a positive (but only just). Not one player had a good game and that has got to be down to the manager or the rest of the coaching staff. Not sure where we go from here. Thoroughly depressed.