Fan The Flames

Surely that's how you row around a boating lake. Boating lake row forwards; racing, commuting or smuggling row backwards.

Too much coffee this morning Weston? A question was asked whether it was ok to kill innocent Palestinians. You said it was ok because no one is deemed innocent under a fatwa. And that you've pointed this out countless times but no one is listening. That bit's not important, just funny. So I asked how does that work, seeing as they are different sides, different religions etc To which you replied WTF are you talking about? 😆

Desperate.

But you've continually condemned the UK for doing this but don't condemn other countries for doing the same. Weird.

You rightly raged about innocent people being killed in the dessert but are prepared to puff your chest out, lean back on the bar and declare that it's just tough luck if innocent Palestinians die in such large numbers. I just don't get that compartmentalised way of thinking. I guess it's easy to be a pub hard man when you have no skin in the game and the others are just some sixth form thinking, post liking, soppy hippies.

But you haven't explained why this hamas islamic fatwa extends to the Israelis jewish armed forces. You're seeing the word innocent and running with it, into a bit of a dead end.

Ok thanks.

Does war justify killing 20 innocent people for 1 low level target?

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/02/israelopt-un-experts-appalled-reported-human-rights-violations-against

But definitely by not being a soppy hippy.

Yes they'll sort it out and be back home in time for tea and Dawson's Creek.

It's all a conspiracy by the deep state, whooooooooooo

Both sides use extreme violence. Which is accepted or hated by onlookers in different parts of the world. Two heavily entrenched differing world views which isn't solved by saying one is a baddy and the other one isn't.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/11/lebanon-protests-explained/

Yes I'm aware that's how they will act and that they will claim that shit happens in war. With few consequences.

Not suggesting anything by suggesting stuff. Then followed up by some vague fluff. Great input DD.

Are you trying to suggest they were up to something else or just being flippant.

The information flow straight after an incident is normally telling before the perpetrators have time to button down the narrative. It was stated early yesterday that the IDF attacked the convoy because they believed that it was carrying a Hamas target. And that the IDF 'mistake' was not bombing the convoy but wrongly believing that it contained the Hamas target. If This is true then this wasn't the fog of war stuff, the aid workers were planned collateral damage, or in real terms murdered because they were either in the way or seen as helping Hamas.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-right-wing-activists-are-preparing-to-resettle-gaza-after-the-war/ And so the cycle continues.

Not with that pass. It was a poor pass and it was risky.

Every point matters and not giving your rival 2 more points matters even more. 10 points short with two games in hand was more doable than it is now.

At that point not losing was more important.

Whilst each bit of action can be over analysed and reduced to a point where you can point the finger, I do think at that moment you need to find a team mate and retain possession.

His long kick yesterday to their keeper gave it straight back to them allowing them to mount a final and crucial attack.

Oh well, no big deal. Next.