Cheers benjii. Do you know whose responsibility it is to request the removal of the charges? i.e. Would it be Pompey or the PFA in this instance? If it's the club that requests the removal, I wonder why they requested it for the other 2 charges to be removed (in September 2014) but not these 3...?
If Pompey can do it with parachute payments I'm sure there's nothing wrong with Labour re-allocating the same money for multiple purposes either....they come from the same school of financial management afterall
I'm still confused why 'Portsmouth Community Football Club Limited' still have 3 charges (all attributable to the PFA) showing as outstanding at Companies House when they've been debt-free (sic) for 6 months now. Any finance gurus out there who can shed some light on this? Cheers
Indeed. However, the Tories are more pro- 'make-the-constituencies-an-even-size' than Labour. Granted, there's a valid argument for saying FPTP isn't the fairest system in the world but, given its what we've got, how about we make it as fair as possible (within the confines of the system)? Just a thought.
#whataboutery klaxon#
Although, of course, Cameron polled more votes (10,703,654) in 2010 than Blair did in 2005 (9,552,436) and more or less the same as Blair in 2001 (10,724,953).
If it wasn't for those pesky constituency boundaries.....
Adam Blackmore @bigadamsport
BREAKING #pompey There was an overall loss of £171,000 for the year 2013-14 after including interest on loans taken out to buy club back.