trousers

Anyone got any footage of this chap playing against a team that can defend?

Ah, here's the answer.... http://democracy.portsmouth.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?MId=2529

I guess that depends on the wording of the planning permission approval. Did the council give specific approval for a building that would become a Tesco store or would it have been more generic than that? The latter probably sounds more likely I suppose.

Anyone know why Point Estates (the company that owns the 'Tesco' land) had 4 charges registered against it on 31st December 2014 (according to Companies House)? Perhaps I should cough up £4 to find out...

They're just applying the finishing touches....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-31023136

Missed this from last week so apologies if already posted....contains a few chortles and facepalms.... http://thegreensoccerjournal.com/decider-article/back-in-black/ About time someone informed Companies House about that last quote....it's still showing 3 PFA charges against the club despite the "debts being cleared" 5 months ago...

My observation was based on the announcements from guards etc this month. There seems to be more announcements about 'broken down trains' than 'track or signalling' issues in recent weeks.

They have indeed been very poor this month. There seems to be much more incidents of train failures than usual, so perhaps points to an issue with their maintenance dept. Time to re-nationalise I reckon....

They weren't able to stop West Ham, despite being unhappy about it.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31000595

That's next week. Away to top of the table Wycombe this weekend.

Sweet Relegation zone on Saturday evening then....

Can't see any reason why he won't be in the squad for the Swansea game. I assume someone's booking a flight for him as we speak....?!

OK, perhaps I should have worded it differently. I mean they have the best interest of the UK in that they don't want it broken apart ergo they wouldn't do anything to jeopardise the future of the UK. The SNP would do anything they could to undermine the UK. Anyway, if there's one thing I should credit the SNP for its that they've made politics almost interesting again

Fair point

Welcome home Mane Someone get him on a plane first thing tomorrow

Yep (I think!)

I guess argument in this scenario is that the separatists could end up with a disproportional amount of influence on UK politics by being in the cabinet. The same amount of disproportionate representation that people were moaning about in 2010 when the Lib Dems got a sniff of power. Yes, OK, the lib dems have hardly altered the course of history with their interventions, but thats largely due to them ultimately acting in the interests of the UK whereas the SNP would be aiming to cause as much disharmony as possible.

Bugger

Come on Ghana!!

If you were a politician trying to convince a room of 100 voters to vote for your party what would you gain most from? - A room where only 10% of the people could vote for you? Or - a room where 90% of the people could vote for you? The reason the SNP are so keen to participate in the "10% room" is to bang the separation drum on a bigger stage rather than presenting the policies that they believe will make the UK a better place, the UK being the country they are aiming to represent by standing at this election....

Spot the cock....

League 2 fixtures tonight: Accrington v Bury Cambridge v Dagenham A win for Bury (to put Pompey 15 points below the playoffs) and a win or draw for Dagenham (to put Pompey 2 points above relegation), please

I can't answer for Wes Tender but whilst I also "dislike" the SNP it's not my reason for saying they shouldn't be included in the UK-wide TV debate(s). I simply see a mis-match between a regional political party and the TV audience to which they are appealing for votes.

Indeed, and not to mention the part they played in Thatcher getting elected in 1979....