Matthew Le God

The team in 18th place is currently on fewer points than games played. 24 points from 25 games. Over a 38 game season that average points per game would equal 36 points.

School

No it isn't. Because it was an an answer to the question 'will Celtic have enough money'. The link is evidence of their money, the question was not do they have the intention to use their money on players.

[h=1]Celtic: Scottish champions announce £24.4m six-month profit[/h] https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51421097

Have you considered people would be put off by the storm?

Fiction

Shepard

You are in the tinpot 3rd tier ffs!

I know, but to have more than you can register is daft. At the very least you then need to look at loaning them out. So my point remains valid.

It isn't a real bite if I know he is fishing

Read it in the context of what it was replying to! He was claiming I'm a Christian adjacent. I replied by saying that if you don't think something has met its burden of proof then you aren't an adjacent.

You still don't understand how 'burden of proof' works! You made the claim that Saints are the only side, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

What does that mean? There are only 4 points between Saints and 8th place. That is a tiny gap and since the end of November Saints have closed that gap.

That does not hold together as an argument 1) We don't have the worst home record 2) It has started to change, as it is been better since the end of November 3) If the away record remain as good as it is then that clearly can move Saints up the table... as it has done with us level on points with 10th

Which clubs?

It was a rebuttal to Turkish complaining they had spent a lot more than Saints. Spending money is not want is important... it is how you spend it. And even though Saints have messed up some recent transfers, for value for money they are doing a lot better than Everton (having spent less and close on points) 'Maxing' - you appear to be using that as a negative... why? 'Small squad' - again Hasenhuttl has said he deliberately wants a small squad to keep the players interested, rather than lots of senior players hanging around, not playing and knocking morale in training

So you decide to ignore everything I say and bring up something completely irrelevant! How about you play the post and not the poster!

By being bailed out by owners. For all the money you mention Everton have spent, they are currently only 2 points ahead, so it clearly has been Saints with better value for money spent. It is not how much you spend it is how well you spend it. Sure Saints have had lots of **** ups in recent years, and until those **** ups have left the club I think it is unlikely we'll be spending big. It is daft to have a go at the club in the transition phase where they have admitted they mess up and are now trying to resolve it. It will take a few transfer windows.

Are you suggesting that is a bad thing? Would you prefer the club to be unsustainable?

Is that the Everton that are currently only 2 points above Saints? Clearly our money has been better spent and is better value for points earned.

As this is clearly at me. - How do you know I'm hetrosexual? - How do you know I'm white? - Thinking a religion is evil for supporting slavery, genocide, sexism and homophobia is not extreme right wing - You can't be supportive of Christianity if you think its morals are bad and it has not met its burden of proof

We are currently level on points with 10th place, so how is our start relevant to if we can get into the top 10 in the remaining games?

It is not free, along with part or all of wages paid, a loan fee will also be paid to Saints.

Every club has to sell to buy. PL clubs are restricted to 25 players over 21 years old. You can't keep buying without selling/loaning players out.

Ignoring questions again