Matthew Le God

It is vague and wishy-washy... reminiscent to your lack of responses to questions in another thread

It would have been decided months ago.

I look forward to James Ward-Prowse free kicks vs socially distanced walls!

It doesn't show the home form is bad, it shows the ratio between home and away points. Not the same thing. (Yes I know the home record is bad)

Teams have played different numbers of games and different opponents so that does not work.

I hope you were wearing a mask when you coughed!

Solution...

The process has been sped up for this, with timeframes given of 12-18 from the start of the event.

No, but it is hardly unreasonable to be more concerned about the health of the society you live in than one you don't.

It doesn't require the whole world to be immunised for the UK to return to 'normal'.

They have already made them and they are in clinical trials.

Hardly surprising or unreasonable to be more concerned about the health of the society you live in than one you don't.

This looks promising...

Beatles

The post I was replying to used this... "One or two people probably die driving to games each season, yet we don’t ban driving. People have died fly helicopters to & from games, including a friend of mines brother many years ago. Yet we still allow it." That is a flawed argument, as fatal car & helicopter accidents are not contagious.

Aid

Do you two not have empathy for other humans? One person dying is one person too many.

They don't communicate using subtitles in their everyday life, they use sign language. So why the issue with it being used for important news?

Pop

Break

You didn't answer the question. Also, I didn't say millions in the UK would die. I'm struggling to see how you think going back to normal wouldn't see a huge spike in deaths. They are at 30k which is horrific despite social distancing, no social distancing would increase transmission and increase deaths. Please explain why that wouldn't be the case?

So you don't think social distancing reduces transmission rates? The reduction in people standing next to each other clearly reduces virus spreading. I don't see how you can argue against that. If there is reduction in the virus spreading then there is going to be a reduction in deaths. You want us to 'go back to normal'... that would lead to an increase in transmission and and increase in deaths!

Thousands have died with social distancing, no social distancing as you appear to want with your 'return to normal' would be an absolute disaster!