Trousers will now say that it's implementation at a local level that is the issue etc and that it's not actual policy as he normally does ignoring all the facts that have previously been on here.
The bonus became everything. You're professional worth and success was based upon it & therefore all risks were worth it to secure the biggest one you could.
I asked someone involved to explain sub-prime and the whole rigmarole to me once and their closing statement stuck with me "it's all a giant con. It's all bullsh_it".
As long as it's not a right wing tory government I can live with it. At the last election I was all for a coalition of the able. We ended up with Ian Duncan Smith and Jeremy Hunt.
All the lit' we've had has been negative from all sides. Labour's have been about not trusting the tories with anything, tories about not trusting Labour with the economy, UKIP about foreigners taking local jobs & HS2 (big issue around here) and so on. Even the local hustings were like that.
Personally I've found the whole campaign to be very negative from everyone.
The only good thing is currently outside my local polling station all the candidates from the ward elections are sharing brollies and cups of tea and chatting amicably which was nice to see.
Does small government concoct laws to force housing associations, private non state organisations, to sell their houses at knock down prices? That smacks of big government and maximum state intervention.