hypochondriac

That has been going round for years and is possibly created by Chris Morris. Would be interesting to know if it was true or not.

Parks and Recreation is a good shout.

Odd bloke.

I still fail to see the funny side of implying that I am a paedophile. The fact you find that amusing says more about you then me.

You really are quite a hateful individual.

Oh do give it a rest Kraken. We are a forward thinking business, we are in the Prem now and sentimentality doesn't come into it. I applaud the decision and TBH it's a shame we didn't get these spongers off the gravy train sooner.

Janet Street Porter supposedly said that many knew what was going on but did nothing. They are the shameful ones.

If you bothered to read the posts I was referring to those who knew it was going on and did nothing. Not the victims.

He directed the pilot episode but he isn't the series director of

Besides she didn't say it was just women who knew about it.

That hasn't relevant. They had from the 70s up until last week to come out with these accusations but they did nothing. Shameful

It's pathetic that so many supposedly knew it was going on yet did nothing.

I heard that Cortese scrapped them 'because I do not want to deal with followers of a non board'. Not very pc is our chairman.

Which is absolutely the correct attitude. Look after the pennies and the pounds look after themselves. (except in circumstances where that doesn't happen then just take out a loan based on future earnings). I'm sure that's a saying.

I hope not. The club is right to do away with such trivial events. We let our results do the talking and shouldn't have to be bend to the will of the fans.

That's utterly pathetic.

Oh do be quiet those who think this is bad for the club. We don't know the full details and it could be we have come up with an innovative new way of distributing programmes that saves the club money. Well done SFC.

There clearly is something wrong with that, it's abhorrent but even so there is a difference between that and engaging in those acts. Now if you want to discuss it sensibly with me then that is one thing, but implying that I am potentially a danger to children is low and a pretty disgusting thing to say even in jest.

Stop fishing. I haven't got personal with you.

You were fishing for a bite and it was childish and pathetic, whether you were joking or not.

PompeyScot claimed to never come on here yet is always saying "I just had a quick look over there today..."

Well yeah but I didn't think that was worth mentioning since it wouldn't succeed.

Chin was not in charge for the second admin, that was CSI.

You were looking for attention. Well done you provoked a response by suggesting that I am a paedophile because I look after children. How big of you.

I'm not sure why you found the bit about Gary Glitter most troubling. That could quite easily be a stubborn over 80 year old man who has spoken to an old friend who was guilty of these chances (Glitter) who told him that there was a media conspiracy against him and refuses to accept the guilt of his mate. I think quite a few of the accounts can be dismissed as they didn't know the age of the individuals involved and were speculating. Some admittedly were troubling (especially the dressing room bits at the BBC) but I still find it extraordinary that no one came forward whilst he was alive and the interviewer annoyed me immensely asking leading questions and pressuring interviewees till he got the answers he wanted. He was working on the assumption that he was guilty and then doing everything he could to get that answer which isn't the correct way to do a documentary of this nature IMO regardless of Saville's guilt.