hypochondriac

Can't remember. There are sooo many articles!

Look I'll just accept that you consider every rumour and comment from posters on here that are not backed up with a verified source as total b*llocks. That way you don't have to continually repeat it on every thread. Deal?

Fine then ignore it. You won't be satisfied unless the pitch announcer spoke to you in person (and even then you probably wouldn't believe it) so don't bother to comment. FWIW I have known about this for months because a separate source told me about it and Duncan confirmed it a few weeks back.

Just so you know guys I know Mike Pavitt who is mentioned at the end of that article. I have emailled him (and someone else from here is seeing him tonight.) I shall let you know if I get any interesting info either on the judge or the case.

The insolvency guy in the article reckoned that PFC would win.

I think if they lose then the option that Faz talks about could happen. They could also come out without a CVA which many of the papers reckoned they would do (including the news.)

Oh and clearly Duncan (and Steve Grant and Ron for that matter) are not just randoms are they.

I don't care if you don't believe it. I'm glad that people are still able to post what they know to be true despite the abuse they receive. If you don't want to listen to it or think it is total rubbish then ignore it and allow others who do believe it to take on board what is said.

See above.

It's not rubbish.

According to the Brentford forum, the original fee was on the saints OS and it was then edited.

apparently it was on our site and was then edited.

Surely he will play LM Saturday with Harding behind him?

You talk a lot of sense John B.

I think Stu would be the first to admit he is sometimes too oppinionated for his own good. He makes bold predictions which sometimes blow up in his face and make him look foolish. He does however make a lot of valid points (even if he does put some of them accross too forcefully on ocassion.) I think if everyone (including Stu) followed the rule of the previous incarnation of the forum: "play the ball not the man" then things would be a lot better and posters may concede that many of Stu's concerns are legitimate.

Only Stu claimed that as far as I could see. I commented a couple of times on the speculation that the Echo had been banned.

I agree with you, I don't think someone should make a statement saying they had been banned when no one was sure either way. It should have been speculation. Well done to Steve who got the definitive answer. Unfortunatel, where SFC is concerned it is often difficult to get these answers and so speculation will continue.

Although the first post does say "seems". Someone found out the truth and the thread was locked. Looked like the forum was working well.

Lol. I genuinely think you need some help (if you are being serious that is.)

Do give it a rest you tiresome individual.

All about opinions I suppose. I just know the football I watched was of a better quality last season than the season before. That's from both teams.

Clearly I wasn't talking about isolated games, I was talking about the season in general. Forest at home 2 seasons ago would be a perfect point to explain how awful championship football can be if I were going down that route.

Pretty sure his style was. Extreme yes but I get the point.

IMO the quality of football last season was of a higher quality than most of the football I saw in the CCC.

What personal abuse? Mostly I see people seriously questioning his approach.