hypochondriac

No. Potentially crap but you get what you PAY for

No. Potentially crap but you get what you PAY for

But you don't pay a fiver to twitter

Crap for me.

Red and white?

I am going to get "Mann" on the back of my saints shirt should he pull this off.

Andronikou administrator not attending apparently having been here so far for Portsmouth HMRC case: being read as a bad sign by some on court 52

Change of heart Pancake. I just can't bring myself to dream

Agree Nick

They will escape IMO. Boo.

]Toast for luck.

Nah. I don't think there is any chance of pulling the plug whilst they have potentially 20 odd million from parachute payments and the players to sell. That was justa dirty dirty bluff to persuade the judge. CHEATS

By comparison they should be ordained!

So anyone want to make a prediction then? I reckon the judge will ask amendments to be made to the CVA which COULD see HMRC's claim above the 25% threshold.

ARGH please no football-rumours.

It isn't about flak. I can only speak for myself but I tend to comment on particular issues. I have also recognised what Cortese has done well. I imagine that Steve feels a similar way.

Yep. I think it is the people who react who are infinitely worse.

In this instance he didn't have the support of all of them. It's why he apologised (very grateful for that BTW) and IMO the matter is finished.

Totally agree. I have on occasion been driven to insults by some posters who I think post deliberately to wind people up (like delldays) but I like to think that I am civil most of the time.

I agree with you Smirking Saint that Stu does go over the top and bring it on himself. He does however make quite a few good points on occasion and sometimes puts them across in a reasonable manner, only to be abused or personally insulted. I understand that he gives out his fair share, but that doesn't excuse the same behaviour from others who then moan that Stu is being too forceful with his opinions.

How is that a non story though? Nick actually posted an update saying it was not a clerical error. It's a potentially huge story IMO.

How is that allowed? (Ps I'm staying off the main board but the pull of this thread is too strong!)

So they got a sh*t load of money in January which they promptly used to sign a load of players which helped them get to the FA cup final. Disgraceful.

Most of the topics I have seen of late are able to easily be debated without getting personal. Sure there are some idiots I agree with that. The likes of Stu though, he can go over the top sometimes but it is quite possible for posters to debate the points he makes sensibly but most choose to attack him personally just because of who he is.

But that just gives an incentive to people who disagree with a thread to get personal in the hope that a thread is locked.