hypochondriac

Some things are beyond parody. Give these people an opening and it never ends.

And has been absolutely slaughtered by the usi hard left factions within labour for his troubles.

To be fair even their own fans admit that.

The image of that awful soulless stadium they have three quarters empty is just glorious.

Just had a look and I realised I had listened to him recently on YouTube doing plank of the week. I thought that was quite amusing tbh so I'll look out for more of his stuff cheers. Peter Hitchens is OK but he can be a bit arrogant sometimes and his rigid stance on drugs is a bit OTT.

I can't say I've ever listened to him. I don't see the issue with Hartley-brewer. She has some quite Conservative views that someone could easily disagree wtih but she's happy to admit when she's wrong and she gave the government both barrels for the Cummings situation and copped a lot of flack from people who previously supported her. Vastly preferable than someone odious like James O'brien on LBC who mostly invites unintelligent people into his show so he can belittle them and get high on his own anal gas. He also had a significant role in the Carl Beech child abuse allegations which did devastating damage and ruined lives and for which he never properly admitted his role in.

Some dodgy content doesn't invalidate every segment and guest who appears on the station.

It's talk radio not sport but she's a guest on the show not a presenter.

Many of the posters on here remind me of this charming lady:

Antifa say that fascism is bad. What's so controversial about them?

Just wrong and laughable nonsense I'm afraid. Loads of footballers come from working class communities and quite a few of them give very few fucks about initiatives like this just like their mates who find the whole thing pretty cringy. I'm sure there's a group who are right on and happy to support the latest cause but I can assure you there's not the unanimous level of support for this that you think there is. Like I said though it's impossible to prove and you'll deny that's the case without proof but no one is going to stick their head above the parapet because the woke twitter stasi will be after them calling for their sacking.

And comments like that demonstrate why black lives matter is such a genius marketing slogan. What's so controversial about antifa? If you don't support them your pro fascist right?

It's a bloody pr statement. Many players I know can barely string a sentence together, let alone write cogent and finely crafted sentences. Do you have any insight into how these sort of campaigns work? It's not quite the same thing but do you think for example that every player that attends duties on behalf of the club or does things for the saints foundation actually supports everything that goes on? Or do you think they're instructed to do it and told how to behave and go along with it for a quiet life? What do you think is more likely, that hundreds of individual players all share the exact same opinion on this issue or that there's a range of opinions with many of the players either having little interest in the specifics and being happy to put their name to something to keep the gaffer and the league happy or they don't agree with political statements in football but know that the consequences of dissent could very well cost them their jobs so keep their heads down and do as they're told? As I write this, an ex saints player is currently sharing an anti blm meme to a WhatsApp group I belong to. The fact that you think that footballers of all people just agree wholeheartedly with this initiative is not only hilarious, it's naive as well.

As someone else has already pointed out to you, a statement "on behalf of all players" isn't actually from all of the players. The fact you think that all players are robots with one singular opinion and that because there hasn't been any dissenting voices because players know the consequences of doing that means that they all agree says it all really.

I know footballers (well lower league ones and ex prem ones as my brother in law is an ex footballer) and if that group is anything to go by then there's a hell of a lot of opposition. I'd be very confident that their reactions would be very similar to the average current prem footballers as well. They wouldn't be able to discuss it publically though for the reasons already stated.

In a hypothetical scenario where Alex Mccarthy stood whilst everyone else knelt during the last game, do you not think there woild be widespread denunciation and huge pressure on the club to get rid of him unless he relented? Because its really clear that that is what would happen.

Whereas your high handed and arrogant attempt at forum moderation was all sweetness and light.

They're supported by an extremely fringe group of people aren't they? So it doesn't seem like they need a lot of discussion because everyone is either indifferent to them or condemns them. That's not the case for BLM.

Sounds like they have some idea: “We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on, sort of, ideological theories. And I think that what we really tried to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many black folk,” "We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia in particular, we're trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super versed on ideological theories."

Yes that's something I'd be suspicious of too... Until you read that the Co-founders of the black lives matter movement have described themselves as Marxists and spoken about creating a Marxist movement for black people before she set it up. So not really that suspicious then.

Obvious to everyone apart from the black lives matter website, their verified twitter accounts, their fundraising pages, the spokespeople who have been all over the media, activists on social media, the banners at the protests, the interviews from people at the protests and High profile celebrities like Anthony Joshua. Other than that it's obvious I agree.

If the BBC were a person they'd be prescribed medication.

Big credit for the club hierarchy for getting everyone together and publically declaring they wrre backing the manager and if it came to it they would back the manager over the players. Since then there was a clear change of power and we saw an upturn in form.

If you have a look at the post match reaction thread it's almost universally positive. I also believe he got the assist for the first goal. We really don't have a lot of strength in that area and I'd rather give him a run now and develop him than to stick with hojbjerg who has been disappointing anyway and probably isn't going to be with us next year.

Getting to 50 points should be the target now and would be an excellent result considering where we were around November.