hypochondriac

Yes but where? If you have explained it then there should be evidence of that explanation on this thread that you can show people? You asked for evidence of your lies and people posted them. In the same way you are asked to substantiate this specific claim with a post and a poster but you cannot do so. You've made something up and the claims you made do not exist in this thread. Just admit it and apologise like you did in the last thread and we can move on.

you do realise that you are essentially running away with your fingers in your ears because lets be honest, you can't name a poster or a post where anyone said that. If you have posted the answer then I must have missed it. Kindly tell me which post of yours answers the question and I'll apologise for missing it. Which post and which poster on here backs up your claims?

Oh dear soggy wrong again. In response to your quite ludicrous claim here: Sour Mash said: Note the use of the present tense with the word "have" (I've put it in bold for you so it's easier to understand.) CLEARLY Sour Mash was referring to the current situation and made no comment at all about historical violence. This was the ONLY time you were called bonkers in this thread and it had nothing to do with you calling Christianity a violent religion. Please tell me where you were called bonkers for suggesting that Christianity is a violent religion like Islam? Keep those lies coming.

Where have you explained it? You keep saying you have explained it but have thus far failed to provide a shred of evidence to support your claim that "posters are suing stays to claim that all Muslims are a threat." which post and what poster said this?

So it wasn't me then. You haven't answered any question, you are desperately wriggling and trying not to answer. So let's try one more time. You claimed that posters were using stats to try to prove that all Muslims were a threat. Which poster said this and what post did they say it in? Where was someone using stats to prove this? Once you answer that very basic question that you refuse to address, then I'll apologise for saying you've invented stuff. It's a shame that this point has to be laboured but it does really undermine your broader argument about Muslims which I have some agreement with. So finally; will you answer the above question?

No it hasn't. A few posters expressed concern about the Islamic religion and some of its teachings, pointing out that currently Islam has a much greater violence problem than other religions. You took this to mean that Islam has always had a greater violence problem than Christianity which is innocent of any of that sort of thing (which no one said). Someone posted some stats to say a high percentage of Muslims disagreed with Charlie hebdo violence. Some people said that in their opinion, the percentage whilst still a minority, was still larger than the average population to the point that it was significant. You took this to mean that people were using stats to try to say that all Muslims were a threat (which no one said.)

Or Hypo? When did I mention anything about you and your neighbours kids? Not making stuff up again are you? You still haven't demonstrated where people were using stats to show that all Muslims were a threat, no matter how many times you try to deflect.

Neither of those posts have stats in. In fact 326 denies his earlier comment that all Muslims are a threat!

No it isn't. Which poster used stats to try to say that all Muslims are a threat?

It's a very accurate description of what you do and I see you are doing your normal tactic of deflecting and hoping that your hypocrisy is forgotten.

Where did someone try to use stats to show that all Muslims are a threat?

It's all written in one of the posts above.

I'm glad that you're the moral arbiter on this forum. Thank goodness that we can take our cues from you. So what was the cutoff point? Friday it was disgusting and disrespectful but Sunday you can return to your grandstanding and pomposity with impunity?

See above. You are the one writing blatant untruths and then whining that no one else has anything to offer in this thread. How about stop writing lies and stick to talking about the issues and then it won't be so difficult for others to do the same.

I can't be bothered to trawl back and find your exact quote but for starters: "posters on here are saying we should kill all Muslims" "posters on here are using stats to try to say that all Muslims are a threat. " Both lies and you have failed to find a single example.

Indeed. There are numerous examples just in this thread. I've pointed just one example out above.

Why would I apologise? You've done it in two threads now. Show me one post where someone has used stats to show that all Muslims are a threat? Show me where someone has suggested we should kill all Muslims? Then I will apologise. Until then how about you stop making stuff up, it certainly doesn't help your argument.

So actually none of that says that robots will take over 70% of the jobs. It almost says the opposite in fact.

He's probably laughing because you sound like a bit of a fantasist...

How many people have said that? Maybe one poster? And absolutely no one was trying to use stats to prove that all Muslims are a threat. Not a single poster. Nice of you to join another crusade by pointing out the flipping obvious. Thanks for enlightening us with brand new information like "not all Muslims living in Britain are a threat to the West." Who knew!

When you say "you lot on here" what do you mean? You do realise there has been an incredibly diverse number of views regarding this issue and actually no consensus right?

Isn't that a really really obvious point to make though?

I thought all this dredging up other threads and arguing in the gutter with the riff raff was beneath you? I thought it was disrespectful to those who died in Paris and an insult to their memory? You hypocrite.

He does it all the time. It's a bit strange.

I'm not going over this again after this buy you claimed that people were suggesting we put all gay people in ghettos and we're calling people nazis when no one ever said that. That was just one example, they were an awful lot on there.