Jump to content

Rattlehead

Members
  • Posts

    1,058
  • Joined

Everything posted by Rattlehead

  1. So we will be starting League One on -10 points. At least we will win more games and easily have the best stadium in League Two.
  2. That's what he deserves, so let's hope so.
  3. At least they could be *rsed to go and give the club some money.
  4. You must be tired.
  5. So we start next season on -10 points in League One.
  6. What are 'rascits' then Ginger B*llocks?
  7. £500? Cheaper than a divorce.
  8. Obviously I know the answer to my question.
  9. SaintRobbie is clearly a passionate fan who genuinely cares and is trying his best. He's also obviously a nutter but he's a likeable nutter, who is a passionate fan who genuinely cares and is trying his best. Not sure this thread will make a sticky, or change anything at all in fact, and I didn't even read it all in fairness, but his obvious passion is there for all to see and even inspired me to be positive for at least a nanosecond. I say fair play to SaintRobbie.
  10. What's the story here then? Promotion to admin? Watching the milkman? Checking when to start a new paragraph? I'm reading 1984.
  11. Really? I always thought you were at least 48.
  12. I have no problem and it may well all be genuine but I just think a little more information than a Saintsweb name containing SFC in it (e.g. credentials, plans) ought to be divulged before anyone would start winging off emails to f*ck knows who. Have you seen this thread? http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=11811 Same email address and apparently claiming a company has been set up (admittedly not from MarkSFC's new account directly). I cannot see the company name at Companies House and am therefore a little dubious. Not unreasonable surely?
  13. I am a lifelong fan of 36+ years.
  14. Sorry also, but you are deluded if you think this will make any difference. I admire your efforts, in a way, but it is a waste of time. I also note that my earlier post seems to have vanished.
  15. Why would anyone waste their time emailing this anonymous noob (probably from a personal email address)?
  16. And who are you then Mr 2 Posts?
  17. I'm afraid this idea is complete b*llocks and, for that reason, I'm out.
  18. Can't see the company name at Companies House.
  19. One has to question this guy's financial acumen.
  20. Only £1 million per bucket required then.
  21. Couldn't agree more. This idea is admirable yet completely b*llocks and, for that reason, I'm out.
  22. What sort of return would I get? What's the dividend policy?
  23. Agreed. Kate Winslet would have been my preference.
×
×
  • Create New...