the stain

Are you saying that opinions can't be wrong?

Yes, he gave his opinion and I said he was wrong. You're still struggling, aren't you?

Ok, here goes (though I think you're still going to be struggling)... Sour Mash thinks the players who are racially abused should not walk off the pitch and I said that that's not his decision to make because he doesn't know what it feels like to be racially abused on the pitch. You, very cleverly, pointed out that I didn't know what it was like to be racially abused on he pitch either, and then I pointed out that I imagined that it wasn't very nice. Now you're saying that everyone agrees that it's not very nice to be racially abused on the football pitch and it seems like the difference that we have is that I think the players have the right not to be abused and to take action if they want and you/sour mash seem to think they should just get n with it and ignore it. The problem with the approach is that it means nothing will ever change. However, if games are stopped or abandoned because of such abuse then maybe people will twice before saying this sort f stuff or maybe others n the crowd will tell them to shut up or report them to stewards and get them ejected so that game can continue. And in this way, the actions of the players can make the situation better. There. I have no doubt that you will not be able to understand any of the points I have made and will continue to be a tit.

I'm going to assume that black players don't like being racially abused. You are free to think otherwise though would obviously be wrong, but that seems to be your default setting.

I wasn't addressing you, so there is no need to apologise for someone else's error. Also, can you stop stalking me please.

Maybe it's YOU that need to look at YOURSELF. If Sherlock Holmes has tattoos then surely it is a sign that intelligent people can have tattoos as well. You are prejudiced against people with tattoos. Unless, of course, they were temporary tattoos that he was using to mingle in with some low life types in order to solves a mystery.

Ironic I wouldn't worry about it, I often leave toilets feeling this way.

Oh dear. I'll spell out why is think Nadia is a nutter - we do not have thousands of migrants wandering the streets of this country raping people. That is just extreme paranoia. For some reason Nadia has decided that migrants are rapists and need to be thrown out of the country. There is no evidence for this. It is a bizarre belief that singles Nadia out as a nutter. But, I might be wrong. Maybe Nadia is not alone in this belief? Do you think there are thousands of immigrants going around raping people? The last bit of Nadias post says that the women were tarts when the were allegedly raped and now are just old tarts who want some money. Is that how sane people respond to women who come forward and say they have been raped? They may be making it up, they may have been raped. But why automatically dismiss it and start calling them tarts? I wonder if Nadia has considered how women who have been raped feel when they are accused of beng tarts? This also singles him out as a nutter (or *****, if you will). Maybe, he's not alone n this way of looking at rape. Do you automatically assume that women who say they have been raped are tarts and after money? Im very interested to hear your views.

Ok. I posted "nutter alert!" because your post about the immigrant rapists and rape victims being tarts indicated to me that you are mentally unstable. The post is below - you can read it again if you want. Another major indicator that you're a loon is the way you say that Littlejohn is "spot on again". Only a complete nutcase would ever think that Littlejohn is always spot on. Even Hypochdriac agrees on that, and he's a little bit of a nutter himself. This is also not a particularly positive response to your post. I have referred to this already. Not even DPS can agree with you and he's one the forums biggest Tories (in all senses). Basically, Nadia, I found your post to be uninformed and stupid to he extreme.

So on this 5:2 diet, you can eat ANYTHING you want and just because you have 2 days at 600 calories you wont put weight on? I don't believe that. If it works then it must be because of magic or voodoo. What if someone ate a pizza for breakfast washed down with mountains of sugary fruit juice and then had a massive portion of lasagne and chips for lunch with 3 beers and then had a Chinese takeaway for dinner, and snacked on crisps and chocolate throughout the day......and they did this for 5 days, are you claiming that because of the 2 days of 600 calories theyd lose weight? Bullsh*t.

I’m starting a new program, called the Pasta Diet. The Italians have been using it for centuries. Here are the few simple steps: 1) You walka pasta da bakery. 2) You walka pasta da sweetshop 3) You walka pasta da Ice Cream shop. 4) You walka pasta da table and fridge.

Nutter alert!

How did your lack of experience "soon pass"? If that was the only barrier, how did you get a job? If you don't mind me saying, your whole story stinks of lies. You are a bull****ter!

What?

Exactly.....you're sat in the comfort of your home, not out on a pitch being racially abused.....so basically you haven't got a clue. You're entitled to your opinion but you also need to accept that you are wrong and a bellend.

Shave the beard Spuddy. I have my fingers crossed for you.

Who are you to say what the players should or shouldn't do? If the player is abused and wants to walk off and others want to support him then that is their call, not yours. You're an incredibly arrogant person if you think you can decide what is an acceptable level of racial abuse when it is not you being abused......unless, of course, you are the sort of person who routinely abuses players and members of society?

Hmmmmm, something smells fishy, and it ain't my fingers.

A couple of times on here I have mentioned my fear that a way the authorities will undermine the real odious crimescommited on very underage kids particularly commited by various politicians police and clergy during the Thatcher era is to occasionally release stories commited by various celebs. This is another one . I do not like Jim Davidson and am not exactly a fan *cough* of the other fella. But to compare two young wealthy comedians having thier way with a couple of young (not underage) fans with organised rape of very young kids over a very long period is absoluelty devious and clearly an attempt at deflecting the gullible publics attention away from the crimes commited. Some Democracy we live in.

Thats how all predators get away with their deeds.

Completely agree. The big fish have already got away imo.

If saints stay up what? The thread title and content don't match. A better title for this thread would be "who is getting relegated?" or "in your opinion who is going down?" For what it's worth I think it will be Wigan, Reading and QPR. We will finish in 16th, above Villa on goal difference, both of us 1 point above the team in the last relegation slot.

I'd rather not risk £6m on an unproven goalie.

Although I agree with the sentiment, simply quoting a Birmingham fan is meaningless. There could be someone on the brum board quoting Alpine Saint.

A woman.